Essay On Distributive Justice

Am I jus for my disobedient acts? I must be jus for each one that I have ever committed. Civil disobedience is a fracture within the law therefore there must a relishable reason to be disobedient. Yet the reason to go against the state would be due to negligence. Justice is associated with the concept of everything plays a natural role, coming from Feinberg and Gross. Justice must maintain the status quo for society. It is a just act as long as justice is being attempted in the proper context of justices; There are multiple forms of justice and those that decide to go against the state must know why. The need for civil disobedience can be seen when the people see a need for change in their community. There are times when a time for change has come and that time can be because politicians refuse to listen to the people or take action about a cause. Though not engaging is just as hard as not engaging in the situation. There is no limit to the amount of injustices committed and it is unfortunate though there the time when the people must go against other people. The goal is to be non violent however there are times when violent actions occur and this causes the public to suffer. The goal is to justify everyone through fair play or Distributive justice which defined as fairness for the people. A small example of distributive justice might …show more content…
When this happens the objectives become blurred which cause the need to break unjust laws. Those that benefit from the status quo will want keep as is and while others will battle for change. During the French Revolution there was a lot of talk about the situation and about a solution but eventually a war was put in place. Civil disobedience is set in order to change to the stage of order, and to change the status quo. There is always a reason for disobedience just as there is a reason to hit on the hot secretery at work. The goal is to make a