Ethical Relativism

Improved Essays
I enjoyed your post and your thoughts on ethical relativism. You are correct in saying that even in a state there are smaller areas in which families and individuals see issues differently and they handle matters in the way they have been shown. Subjects such as discipline, how to run a family, and how to handle personal family matters are something we tend to learn culturally from our families. Having lived in a small town in Tennessee I remember my mother in law telling her grandchildren (as she told her children when they were younger) if they misbehaved they would go have to go to the whipping tree to get a switch off the tree and if it wasn’t big enough she’d whip them all the way back to the tree until they picked a bigger one. The women from the south that I encountered would have one believe this is perfectly normal because it is how they were raised, however I disagree with this form of discipline. While I respect and enjoy the vast diversity of our world I do believe that cultural …show more content…
In my post I touched on reasons, that at face value, ethical relativism does have its valid points, we as individuals rely on those in our family and society to teach and set examples of what is morally right.2 The issue with this is if no one ever questions cultural practices which are wrong how will anything ever change for the betterment of man?3 What really stood out to me which made me question ethical relativism was there have been changes and progress made on the human rights front and people have altered their views on issues such as slavery and women’s rights. This says to me there are matters which have an absolute truth and I feel anything which causes pain to yourself or another is where the line must be

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Subsequently, if a person or culture deems that murder or slavery is morally correct, ethical relativism holds that the actions are morally correct. Further, if one believes that ethical relativism is morally correct and another believes that it is incorrect,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As we have accepted this belief we grow more accepting of the idea that there are no morals that are superior to others, nor rights or wrongs, moral relativism. Pojman connects these opposing beliefs by showing that people do not solely believe in ethnocentrism or relativism, but a mixture of both, even though people would rather define themselves as relativists. There is a certain pride that…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world of Pojman On behalf of Pojman and his interpretation of universal moral principles “The individual realizes his personality through his culture, hence respect for individual differences entails a respect for cultural differences” The executive board of the American Anthropological Association (69) The executive board of the American Anthropological Association proposal was meant to acknowledge moral diversity in different cultures around the world. This fragment was part of an introductory reading to the essay, “ The Case Against Ethical Relativism” by Louis Pojman. In this essay, he elaborates different arguments against ethical relativism, explains his own interpretation of universal moral principles and reconciles cultural…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethical relativism has been looked at from several different angles by many different people. Louis P. Pojman is one person that has not only questioned, but rejected the concept. Pojman’s argument stands on four objections. His protests are that ethical relativism leads to ridiculous outcomes, gives way to subjectivism, is logically inconsistent, and provides no rational method to resolve conflicts within and between cultures. Pojman theorized that, if the world were to go by ethical relativism, one could no longer make judgements against any society, including their own, because no external or objective truth exists.…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1a. Cultural relativism is the view that no culture is superior to any other culture when comparing systems of morality, law, politics, etc. (AllAboutPhilosophy.org, n.d.) It does not offer a universal right and wrong, but rather offers the notion of morals based on the cultural environment. This diverges from the traditional ethical theories of doing what is right and adopts the ethical theories that are the “lay of the land” as they relate to the local culture in which the dilemma takes place.…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In these next few paragraphs, I will expose the problems with cultural relativism; namely, through the use of the law of non-contradiction. Cultural relativism is an ethical theory that states “correct moral standards are relative to cultures or societies …” (Shafer-Landau 293). For example, the Inuit people believed that infanticide was morally acceptable. In contrast, most of the world believes that infanticide is highly immoral and never acceptable.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout history, people share certain standards, beliefs and norms and sometimes all people share those certain standards as well, but not necessarily. In fact, the values and practices that we feel to be morally gratifying, however, may contradict extremely from those that other people believe to be acceptable. There are certain values and standards of behavior that are normal within a certain culture during their time period and does not really mean that those values or standards are necessarily right. The concept of relativism indicates whether morality is relative to distinct cultures and the time period within the culture. We understand that morality differs from culture to culture and there is no unbiased understanding of moral right and wrong.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Debora Netcliff Professor Stanley English 100 19 October 2017 A Defense Of Moral Relativism Ethical relativism or Moral relativism is the proposition that what is considered moral or immoral or what is wrong or right depends on culture norms, and what behaviors is accepted in different societies in which a decision is made. Also what can be deemed as immoral or moral, bad may be good and ethical in another's society Many cultures differ in their moral practices. These moral and ethical decisions are also based off of inner judgments.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shaw’s essay about Relativism in Ethics he analyzes the matter of what is ethically wrong and right and how relative it is to an individual or to one’s own culture. He defends to argue that ethical relativism of either side is unjustified. Shaw examines that some relativist may think that morality is relative to only the individual and not one’s own culture. This theory considers that what is right and what is wrong is determined by what an individual may think is right or wrong. However, if any individual was to decide what is right and what is wrong how would one know what really is right and wrong.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral Relativism Essay

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although this concept isn’t great for our society, it has a greater success outcome compared to absolutism. In Mary Midgley’s article, she discusses the issues with moral relativism. She claims that although moral relativism doesn’t have the greatest outcome, it is a way to view different cultures. Every culture does something based on their religion and or…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article, “Hands Off Clitoridectomy” by Yael Tamir, discusses the controversial topic of clitoridectomy, and all the arguments within the subject while opening up a new way of perceiving it by comparing it to our own society and practices. She suggest that indeed the practice of clioridectomy is a gruesome and gutwrenching, but there is more to the subject than just the moral issues of it. She address the political and social aspects of performing and living with the procedure and addresses them with passive but firm arguments. Her main point of the article is that our society needs to stop judging and creating prejudices aimed at other cultures or societies when in fact we could be bettering our own society rather than critiquing others.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism may be defined as a theory that advocates the idea of subjective morality. To extrapolate, this theory entails that “different cultures have differing moral codes” and these variances are merely arbitrary. Although this is a seemingly sufficient theory, there are key issues with this school of thought. James Rachels suggests several issues with accepting cultural relativism. He criticizes cultural relativism by stating that the theory is absurd as it entails severe consequences if practiced.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Not all cultures share the same practices or beliefs, but the foundation of humanity is the same. Like James Rachels states, “Each culture retains its own unique flavor while being able to meld with the other ingredients of the salad” (Gunning,…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Human beings are rational creatures that would intensitivity defend themselves. A Human Being would have no reason to place tolerance toward someone else 's morals over their own safety. For example society deems it immoral to kill other people but will deem it as an understandable action if it was done to protect oneself. The undermining of moral confidence that relativism can cause serves only to ensure that people do not approach a situation believing that they are morally superior but rather approach it with an open mind. Moreover, it is not clear people are less motivated about non-universal values beliefs.…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with ethical relativism because we already have it and if we reject ethical relativism then who will have to power to say what's right and wrong for all societies. If we reject ethical relativism then history will repeat itself with a person who will get the power to implement what's right and wrong without any say from…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays