Organizational Culture and Readiness
Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2011) propose that support …show more content…
This organization operates a physician-led model, which often places less importance on nursing evidence than it should. Furthermore, the lack of mentors/nurse scientists could result in an inquiry being quashed before it has really had the chance to blossom. There is an annual EBP presentation, which aims to recruit staff, but is poorly attended, compared to other organization-wide presentations. Consequently, the recruitment, outcome-sharing, and introduction to mentors happen once a year in a four hour time …show more content…
Each incident is assigned to a supervisor for follow up; including identification of the issue, referral to the appropriate personnel, and education/training, as needed, to decrease the risk of repetition. However, it is apparent that follow up of these issues can be delayed due to the lack of priority given to the reporting process and the lack of recognition of repeating patterns. The suggestion of a DSB has been made, where staff provides reports, at the end of each 12 hour shift, to their managers, with issues that they consider important, or having influence over patient or staff safety. The manager, or senior division leader, then provides this information at a 30 minute briefing, attended by multidisciplinary leadership up to and including senior executive vice presidents of the organization. The proposal is that this high level of awareness will speed the referral process to appropriate stakeholders, and dictate faster, more detailed follow-up by an issue-focused member of the DSB team. By analyzing the resolution times of both reporting tools, a comparison will be made as to the best method for the speed reporting, investigation, action, and closure of issues that will lead to the development of a highly reliable