Third world countries are the utmost underdeveloped countries in the world; therefore, their citizens are underprivileged and necessitous. Families living in developing countries, such as Madagascar or Afghanistan, have children under the age of fourteen whose societal and living conditions force them to work. Nevertheless, child labor is a subject of controversy. In the twenty-first century, society has deemed child labor unacceptable, an inconvenient decision considering poor countries demand their youth to work in order to survive. Therefore, in countries that no longer need developing, governments should regulate child labor laws, but in third world countries, governments should allow child labor.
Individuals should accept child labor laws in third worlds where families’ incomes greatly vary. Some parents believe educating minors rather than having them work is the …show more content…
The opposition of child labor was first brought to attention during The Industrial Revolution, when conditions of the workplace gradually interfered with adolescents’ health and safety. The Industrial Revolution is their primary evidence despite the fact that it occurred nearly a century ago. Throughout the previous hundred years, however, the work environment has changed and the government has enforced stricter laws. The United States, an industrialized nation, has a government that regulates its child labor laws, which results in uncompromising laws, yet, because of the leniency of laws in economically impoverished countries as well as their different social setting, their child labor laws do not need regulations. Individuals of the first world have likely not witnessed third world suffering first-hand, which makes child labor or the need for child labor seem useless, but in actuality, minors that work do so to remain alive in a country that has not fully