Expert Witness In The Justice System

Improved Essays
On TV today the use of the expert witness in many crime dramas have given us a slight glimpse of what an expert witness does in the justice system. Expert Witnesses give their opinions to help the court establish a fact for a particular issue or help the court understand the evidence presented. An Expert Witness performs functions including collecting, testing, and evaluating evidence. Then form opinions based on the findings and present that opinions to the court.
By comparing the area in which the witness has expertise with the type of evidence being presented is how expert witnesses can be determined. There are 3 cases which have shaped the review of criteria needed for expert witness testimony, “commonly known as the “Daubert Trilogy.”

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Daubert standard is the best choice for determining the admissibility of forensic evidence and expert witnesses in Florida based on the articles provided. The evidence and expert witness testimony that is put forth in Florida litigation should be assessed by the same standards that apply for all rules of evidence in federal courts. Although the Frye standard provides a wide scope as to what can be used as evidence, a stricter set of standards would be more beneficial to the public because it would assure litigants that the science has been proven to be reliable. Frye is based more on the opinion of other experts in the field and what is accepted.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article “Trial Lawyers Cater to Jurors’ Demands for Visual Evidence,” the author Sylvia Hsieh focuses on how lawyers want the case to happen, how visual evidence can be helpful, and how it can be harmful to the case. First the author Hsieh explains how lawyers expect others to understand how the current case happened. Lawyers have a good understanding and focus towards the case and know how they can explain how their client is innocent to the crime at hand, but it is harder for a Jury to understand it just as well or stay focused long to know all the important details. Second the author Hsieh explains how video evidence can be good. Video evidence can be good because it makes it easier for the Jury to understand what happened and…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Analysis: The Jury System

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Jury System by Kenneth Jost Are major changes needed? Should peremptory challenges be abolished? 1. What is at issue? What is the claim behind this issue?…

    • 2103 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ROLE OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE PROFESSIONAL Criminal justice professional field is wide with differing responsibilities and roles allocated by position and the level of an officer in the criminal justice department. These criminal justice professionals assume/play a key part in guaranteeing law and order to the citizens. This paper outlines the key individual and societal needs that necessitate the roles and responsibilities of a criminal justice professional and their role in serving these needs. Societal Needs…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defendant: A Case Study

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages

    MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES INTRODUCTION Mort Smith (hereinafter “Defendant”) has been served by Rick Sanchez (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) in an action of unlawful detainer pursuant to West’s Ann. Cal. C.C.P. §1161. Defendant declares, as a special appearance in support of a motion to quash service of summons on the grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction see. Defendant was never properly served with the summons and complaint in this action.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When crimes occur, police and investigative officers rely on eyewitness from people that were close to the crime scene. Eyewitnesses then rely on their memories of what occurred during the crime. An eyewitness recalls the event they might give the wrong information and details of what happened because our memories are not perfect and the identifications that eyewitness make can be fallible. Eye witness is important to investigators because they can identify suspects and provide crucial information that is not seen by everyone, but their testimonies can have significant consequences to people. An example of this would be the wrong conviction of Francisco Carrillo.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Evidence Interpretation

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Furthermore, the crime scene investigator must transport all evidence to the laboratory to be tested by the proper forensic scientist. The job of not only the crime scene investigator, but also the forensic scientists at the laboratory, play a very important role in solving criminal cases. It only takes one simple error when handling evidence to convict an innocent person or find a guilty individual…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    NAME & CASE DETAILS: R v Brent Dreamer was a case heard by the District Court, in which Brent Dreamer had been accused and charged with unlawful stalking. The offence was outlined in section 19AA of the Criminal Law Consolidation Act, 1935. The case was held at a preliminary hearing in the Mount Gambier Magistrates Court, where the defendant elected a trial by jury. The judge that heard the case in the District Court was Judge Boomer. The prosecutor accused Dreamer of unlawful stalking because of the instances described in his hearing, such as constant phone calls and visiting when his presence was unwanted.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Eyewitness testimonies are influential pieces of evidence used in the criminal justice system. According to a study in which participants simulated a robbery, intoxicated individuals reported more incorrect details than those that were sober (Read, Yuille, & Tollestrup, 1992). Intoxicated participants also recalled less accurate information than sober participants in another study in which they observed a staged theft (Yuille & Tollestrup, 1990). However, both their anticipation for the event and the study designs could have affected the results. Moreover, not much is known about the vulnerability of intoxicated witnesses to misinformation during post-event interviews.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Dual Court System

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Their answer was to establish multiple new courts at different levels of jurisdiction; including trial, appellate, and supreme court levels. They assigned particular duties and responsibilities to each level of court, from regulating ordinances and city laws to handling minor disputes like property and divorce. One especially important model that was adapted for use in state courts was the New York State Field Code of 1848. This code clarified jurisdictional claims of different issues and gave specifics in the matter of court procedures and regulations. It also established a set of simplified rules for pleadings and how they were to be brought before the court in different situations.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jury Inferences

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It is human nature for individuals to desire a response from others when confronted with an adverse situation, humans want to know if someone did something or if they did not (Greenfield, 2013). This requires a response of admitting to the situation or denying it. In the courtroom the jurors are the ones seeking this response, consequently, the jurors are human. The inferences they may draw from the defendant’s refusal to testify could lead them to believe right away they are guilty of something. The defense counsel may give instructions to the jury stating the defendant’s silence should not be considered an inference of guilt.…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    3. Persuasive Authority • Persuasive authority means that a court may follow the opinion or reasoning of the “persuasive” case but it is not required. The decision to follow persuasive authority depends on the stature of the court deciding the earlier case, the reasoning of the opinion, the similarity to the instant case, and whether the current court agrees with the case. • A federal circuit or district court decision on a question of federal law may or may not be persuasive to a state court considering the same issue. • A decision of one circuit may or may not be persuasive to another.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    | | | |No enquiry allowed into jury deliberations after verdict, even if juror | |Section 51 Criminal Justice & Public Order Act 1994 creates offence |alleges racial or any other type of bias or wrongdoing by the jury. | |to intimidate or threaten to harm a juror. | | |Prosecution and defence "challenges" correct the problems caused by |Jury vetting is against the principle of random selection. | |random selection.…

    • 2129 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Exam 2 1. Impeachment is the accomplishment of calling into examination the honesty or validity of something. There is a two-step process to the impeachment process. It is looked upon by the House of Representatives, and must pass a simple majority of those present and voting. Upon pass being approved, the offender has been impeached.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During my observations, I witnessed a few different steps in the adjudicative process. On the 2nd and 9th of February, I observed the Athens County Court of Common Pleas. The presiding judge over these cases was judge Pat Lang. This court system is for criminals who commit serious, violent or dangerous crimes known as felonies. I was lucky enough to come across all three of the different types of encounters mentioned by Maynard in week 3; judicial, negotiation, and public defender/client.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays