Explain The Steps To Change The Constitution

Improved Essays
The Constitution is an important document, often known as the ‘founding document’ in Australians history, it defines the Australians Commonwealth structure, procedures and powers. Additionally, the Constitution demarcates the powers of the three branches of governance such has the Parliament, Courts and the Executive. In order to amend the Constitution, a referendum must be conducted. The steps to change the constitution are outlined in Section 128 of Constitution and the Referendum (Machinery Provisions) Act 1984 (Cth). Firstly, the suggested changes must be set out in a Bill of Parliament which must be passed by the majority of Parliament. Furthermore, the referendum must be held between 2-6 months after the Bill is passed. Conclusively,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Larry Sabato, an American political scientist who graduated from the University of Oxford, recommends a new constitutional convention to revise the current United States constitution to change all three branches of government. The proposals Sabato is offering do not do any good, as this paper proves later. Constitutional amendments can be great in cases like the 14th or 21st, but these proposals would not do anything like that . Sabato’s opinion on how to revise the judicial branch by increasing the number of Supreme Court justices from nine to twelve and adding a Balanced Budget amendment to prevent any deficit spending are good ideas in theory, but in reality, neither would work.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to either the making or the ratification of the Constitution, the delegates from the Conventional Convention met together in agreement of revising the Articles of Confederation due to its ineffectiveness. Instead of simply doing so, they created a new form of government; Constitution. Although it was created, the Constitution wasn’t established as the “law of the land” just yet. Congress had to not only propose this new document to the states, but also convince them to ratify it. The US Constitution included components that allowed the states of the Union to agree to its ratification.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I Casey Nichols representative of North Carolina fully support the long overdue ratification of the Constitution. The Articles Of Confederation are impuissant and short-lived. An continued absence of a new document that conclusively clarifies our affairs will inevitably lead us to defeat. It was unquestionably imperative that we held the constitutional convention. The rationale is quite evident considering all the affairs we don't have elucidations for.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Constitution Act of 1982 transferred the authority to amend the Constitution from Great Britain to Canada. To date, Quebec’s constitutional concerns have not been addressed to a great enough extent, according to the government or the residence, to formally pass consent on the 1982 Constitution. This is largely due to the distinctiveness of the society of Quebec originating from the largely French speaking population, the resilient cultural identity, as well as history, political, and social traditions, that are more or less not shared with the rest of Canada The question in concern is whether or not Canada’s Constitution should recognize the francophone population in Quebec as a ‘nation’ with characteristics and needs palpably different from those of other provinces in the Canadian federation. The problem has been tackled on a number of occasions but has yet to be resolved.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the War of Independence, the founding fathers sought to create a government unlike any that the world had previously seen. With their recent experiences under British rule, the United States did not want a powerful central government; therefore, they created a document in which all the power went to the states, the Articles of Confederation. When this document proved to be weak, the Founding Fathers began to re-evaluate their stance on a central government. This led to the idea of ratifying the United States Constitution. The Federalists, who supported the ratification, attempted to promote the ratification through a collection of essays called the Federalist Papers.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Change is necessary in the constitution but it is not urgent. Referendum and high court interpretation allows the parliament to amend the constitution. Body paragraph 1 The Australian constitution can be amended by referendums according to (section 128) of the constitution. A referendum national balloting where the nation votes on questions which would change the constitution. Section 128 referendum must be approved by both the houses of parliament, House…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was initially subjected to the scrutiny of Anti-federalists, who believed that the document would not adequately protect the rights of those living under it (Siemers). These fears have partially been invalidated over time, as many revisions have been made in order to ensure the preservation of interests of minorities. It is imperative to recognize that these changes occurred gradually; they were not originally included in the document (Constitutional Amendment Process). Therefore, the Constitution did not succeed right away in this mission, but has done so over time through the 19th, 15th, and 14th amendments and court cases including Obergefell v. Hodges. Ratified in 1920, the 19th amendment was a progressive…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    1.0 Introduction As a nation, Australians have become a unique group of individuals, vastly different from the British who settled in this country. Australia is a multicultural continent with its own laws, constitution and systems, so why should Australians still be a part of the constitutional monarchy under Britain? Why should it not become a republic, and increase its independence? This report will investigate the currant system Australia operates under, and the suggestions that have been made in the past to change to a republic, to come to a conclusion on whether or not Australia should become a republic, or remain a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution can be considered a very controversial topic in regards to our government. The Constitution is used to divide power between the federal government and the states. It is used also to protect the individual liberties of the American citizens. In the article The Ratification Referendum by Sanford Levinson, he discusses how the U.S constitution is flawed in many ways. He argues that Americans should have the opportunity to vote on whether congress should draft a new constitution .…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What was once “regarded as the mixture of law, custom, conventions of governance and institutions existing at any one moment” were instead “charters creating institutions that would henceforth act under the authority they bestowed.” Under this view, constitutions were now the law of the land, even placing it above the highest official in the government. Because of this, any law enacted by the government had to fall under the guidelines of the Constitution, and if the law were to fall outside the guidelines, it could be deemed unconstitutional. In “Four Letters Interesting Subjects”, the author attempts to define the word constitution. The author states that constitutions serve two main purposes: 1) to decide what the form of government should be and 2) what powers should the government have.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas State Of Pride

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A constitution is an agreement or proposal of government that signifies, in essence, a deal between the government and the governed. Like any agreement or contract it recognizes mutually settled controls, responsibilities, commitments and boundaries on contracting parties, and creates methods for action, including law-making and citizen-voter involvement. Since constitutions are the main source of democratic governance and political "rules of the game," they manage to be automatically admired by the over-all populace and reasonably valued by political…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America’s long journey of seeking freedom from governmental oppression, the newly formed nation was skeptical when it came to the discussion of new government authority. Many Americans were still uneasy about consolidated power, while others were aware of the prevalent national instability caused by the lack thereof. Though, in the end, the Constitution prevailed and has become the cornerstone of American government, the path that led to this enduring document was gradual and filled with apprehension and debate. Both sides of the issue had very clear and valid notions about either their support or opposition to the Constitution, and in the end were able to find common ground through patience and compromise.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A constitution is a charter or a plan of government that represents a country and in a sense, is a pact between the government and the governed. Like every other pact or agreement, it identifies all mutually agreed powers, duties and obligations and limitations and also identifying citizen participation in the government (Texas Politics). These provide fundamental law on which legal systems are established. But the government does give power to states to govern its people and still comply under the federal government as a whole. Both U.S and Texas constitutions are similar in many ways, but their difference is the key in how they govern.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Constitution is a document written to embody the fundamental laws of the United States. The first draft of the Constitution was called the Articles of Confederation, but the colonists quickly realized that the form of government the Articles of Confederation created was not going to work well. Consequently, the colonists held a Constitutional Convention, in 1787, the Constitutional Convention was held to amend the Articles of Confederation, they ended up drafting an entirely new Constitution. Some of the people who attended the Convention were Alexander Hamilton, George Washington, James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, and more. This new Constitution took a long time to construct, but eventually was ratified in 1788.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Over the years many individuals have given various definitions as to what the British constitution is. However, it is quite simply documented as ‘uncodified’ which refers to the fact that the constitution is made up of many rules and regulations that have been derived from several sources however they are not on a single legal document which is the case with other countries such as the USA or Germany. As Hillarie Bennett once stated “A written constitution is one contained within a single document or a series of documents.” [ ] Large parts of the UK constitution are in fact written down, much of it in the laws passed in parliament, otherwise known as statute law. There are many principles involved in the British constitution however one of the main and perhaps the most important of the principles surrounding it is parliamentary sovereignty which I will be discussing in this document.…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays