Explain What Problems Prompted The Calling Of The Connecticut Compromise

Improved Essays
What was the Connecticut Compromise?
The Connecticut compromise was an agreement that was formed during the constitutional convention. This agreement grants states equal representation in the senate, and the House of Representatives. It was a result of a disagreement of how much representation each state should have within congress. Before the Connecticut compromise an agreement was finally agreed upon when delegate roger Sherman suggested a two chambered congress. This resulted in the House of Representatives. This all happened before and as a result of the Connecticut compromise.

What is the difference between Federalists and Anti-Federalists?
The Federalists wanted a strong central government and weak state government, while anti federalists wanted power in the state bit in the federal government. Obviously they disagreed on many topics, some key federalists were Benjamin Franklin and George Washington. Key anti
…show more content…
The bill of rights purpose was to technically guarantee the rights that were written. Obviously, that was not always the case, but the bill of rights made it harder for the government to oppress you. Overall it does a good job protecting your rights as a person. It protects all citizens no matter religion or race.

What problems prompted the calling of the Constitutional Convention
The constitutional convention was brought together due to the articles of confederation creating a weak national government. The government was unable to deal with the nations problems and had many other problems. Some of the problems were, government couldn't tax, no national army, no national courts and so on. Those problems led to other problems such as, very few law getting passed, the government could not operate well, and with no leadership nothing gets done. All these problems led to the calling of the constitutional convention.

What was the purpose of the Articles of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As far as I am concerned, the Articles of Confederation was the basic law of the country, and it was a document written by the thirteen original colonies which laid the foundation of the constitution. The main reason: the beginning of the founding of the United States, although from the British colonial yoke, but a thousand things wait to be done. At this time, they need to solve the problem is: economic difficulties, political instability and loose confederation system. The "Confederation" system makes the new US economic difficulties and political crisis, the urgent need to develop a constitution to strengthen the centralization of power.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The articles of confederation was the Untied States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Meaning instead of giving power to the central government they decided to divide it up with different states. But it all wasn't good, congress had trouble passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed (Doc 1). Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expense of the national government (Doc 2). Also the states refused to give the national government enough power to work correctly.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On May 25, 1787, delegates met in Philadelphia to discuss the Articles of Confederation as it was inadequate in dealing with with problems of the states. A new constitution and system of government was created through a great compromise which was called the Connecticut Compromise/ Compromise of 1787 or Sherman's Compromise. The compromise still affects American lives today as it is responsible for the Senate and the House of Representatives. In order to understand the Connecticut Compromise, it is important to know what the large and small states wanted, how their proposals conflicted with each each other, and what the different parties gained out of the compromise.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were very different political parties. One example is that Federalists thought the public office should be ruled by educated men who owned property and would protect rights. According to the textbook on page 292 it states, "Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.". Although the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a few people controlling a strong central government. The textbook states on page 292, "In contrast, the Republicans feared a strong central government controlled by a few people".…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ratifying the Constitution The Articles of Confederation which established a governmental structure to unify all the states that fought in the American Revolution. The Articles of Confederations purpose was to create a confederation of states which soon failed. The reason the articles failed was because the Congress and the national government had not been given enough power to work efficiently. The Constitution was going to take over the place of the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    While trying to ratify the constitution two parties were formed, the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. Now the Federalist wanted a strong government with a strong executive branch. Now the Federalist felt that the Constitution was fine just the way it was, that there was no need for a Bill of Rights. The Federalist also believed that only the elite and educated should be eligible to lead the colonies. Alexander Hamilton was a great influence with the Federalist since he believed that they should have a strong National Bank to manage money across state borders.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Compromise consisted of votes in both houses “in proportion to the whole number of white and other free citizens and inhabitants of every age sex and condition, including those bound in servitude… and three fifths of all other persons… except Indians not paying taxes in each state” It still followed the bases of The Virginia Plan, but small states did not feel like it was fair. A New Jersey attorney general by the name of William Paterson proposed The New Jersey Plan as a substitute of The Virginia Plan. The plan proposed an equal amount of votes for all states just as said stated in the Articles of Confederation. They had already partook in plenty of nasty extensive debates over what they accepted or rejected about The Virginia Plan.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First Short Essay One thing was clear during the convention of 1787, there were an astonishing number of viewpoints that clashed wherever they could. The main topic for debate was the distribution of control. Who would make the decisions for the people the state government or national government? The worry was that if the state government had primary control over the people's interests, who would police them? The Federalists wanted to make sure that the state government officials did not influence political policy to further their own interests.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Priscilla Etim HIST 1301 Professor James Adams July 26, 2017 The Great Compromise: The Ideals and Values of a Growing Nation The Great Compromise of 1787 is the compromise or the settled agreement of the dispute that erupted due to conflicting views and objectives presented from the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey plan. The purpose of these plans was to create proposed changes to the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were three compromises that shaped the last few details to set forth the Constitution. One of those issues was The Great Compromise of 1787. By far this was the one topic that brought on the most disagreements between the states. As the states tried to come to an agreement the state Connecticut came up with their own plan to the floor, they suggested that representation within the lower house would be done by population, and each state would have an equal vote in the upper house.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A bicameral legislature is defined as one in which the legislators are divided into two separate assemblies, chambers or houses. This system is what we Americans use in order to create balance between the powers of its citizens, and it’s government. The Framers being our founding fathers, believed that we needed this system to help America not return to the same overpowering form of government that they left behind when they departed from the British. The Framers of the Constitution created a bicameral legislature as part of their efforts to create separation of powers and to more generally, make it harder for the government to do just about anything without its citizens at hand. Before the start of the American Revolution, the British levied…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    America needed to build a stronger government. They held convention for all 13 states to go to because people thought the Articles of Confederation weren’t strong enough. When the convention started the delegates came up with so many ideas it was like Articles of Confederation were not ever created. Many delegates went to the convention including James Madison, Ben Franklin, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, Governor Morris, Rufas King, Rodger Sherman, and John Jay.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Great Compromise

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We the People When making plans on how the distribution of power should be distributed, there will always be arguments. Whether to do it based upon the population, or of an equal distribution to all of the states involved, it is important to remember to make it fair to all the different citizens, taking into consideration all states and their populations. The amount of people a state has should not be the only determining factor for the amount of representatives in the houses of a legislature. There were many advantages and disadvantages of the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan brought up in the Constitutional Convention. We believe that the Great Compromise was a valid agreement, considering it did not give unequal power to any of the…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Weakness of the Article of Confederation During the course of the Second Continental Congress in 1777, the Articles of Confederation were adopted for the proposal of a central institution. This meeting started in 1775, gathered many of the most brilliant minds of that period at Pennsylvania. Delegates were sent from the thirteen colonies to represent in the convention. The convention was a series of meeting, on the attempt to solve political and social issues. One of the major concern was the concept of distribution in power.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the writing of the Constitution, there were a lot of disagreements on a lot of major issues. It was mainly between the north and the south, with their population sizes and on how the government should be ran. Those issues would affect how the President is elected, weather congress should elect, or the American people should elect. Also how the states would each be represented, by the population and if slaves counted towards the population. There was also the compromise on the trading of slaves, which was a big issue for the south.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays