Morality is a very broad and complicated topic due to the fact that it is based primarily on individual opinions. Moral values constantly change with the generations. Judging by current statistics, all that once was immoral in other time is considered moral. It seems as though people have lost their conscience and are controlled by their surroundings. It‘s true that the family structure in twentieth century era, may mostly consist of the same members of previous decades, parents and children, but are family moral values in twentieth century the same that values of other past centuries? as the result of the modernization Many transformations in family life have occurred ., the moral authority of the 20th century family structure has declined
…show more content…
Indeed, Judith Stacey (1987) points out that emphasis on the negative aspects of marriage and motherhood in early second-wave feminism attracted the label anti-family. she argues, It was there a profound crisis of the nuclear family system in the West represented by ‘The massive increase of female participation in higher education and the labour force which helped to generate secondwave feminism in the …show more content…
the family era of economically-dependent and full-time housewives is regarded as a thing of the past. Women in 20th century socialized and educated, as are men, to enhance their personal development, to make an economic contribution, and to contribute fully to public life. As known view, men and women necessarily should inhabit separate spheres of life, with women taking domestic roles and meeting the emotional-expressive needs of society, and men taking work and public roles and thus meeting society's instrumental needs. Man at work and woman at the hearth, it is not only in the best interest of society but is how the world has always been and ever shall be. but these things and traditional gender roles largely obsolete and the locking of each sex into separate spheres considered as retarding of personal development and violating personal liberty
Indeed, Judith Stacey (1987) points out that emphasis on the negative aspects of marriage and motherhood in early second-wave feminism attracted the label anti-family. she argues, It was there a profound crisis of the nuclear family system in the West represented by ‘The massive increase of female participation in higher education and the labour force which helped to generate secondwave feminism in the …show more content…
the family era of economically-dependent and full-time housewives is regarded as a thing of the past. Women in 20th century socialized and educated, as are men, to enhance their personal development, to make an economic contribution, and to contribute fully to public life. As known view, men and women necessarily should inhabit separate spheres of life, with women taking domestic roles and meeting the emotional-expressive needs of society, and men taking work and public roles and thus meeting society's instrumental needs. Man at work and woman at the hearth, it is not only in the best interest of society but is how the world has always been and ever shall be. but these things and traditional gender roles largely obsolete and the locking of each sex into separate spheres considered as retarding of personal development and violating personal liberty