I want to educate everyday consumers about the intended purpose of GMO’s, as well as the advantages, disadvantages and controversy surrounding them. THESIS STATEMENT: Several American’s today don’t know that GMO’s are in a majority of the foods they consume, therefore, it is important to educate ourselves more about the potential dangers and benefits GM foods provide. INTRODUCTION I. Do we ever think about…
There is only one reason to stand against the labeling of GMO foods and that is financial greed. The labeling of GMOs has long been in effect in Europe. In the U.S.A., only Vermont has such a law.…
Since the FDA’s regulatory policy concluded that there would be no premarket evaluation process for GM products, it has approved variety of GM foods without any labeling requirement. This has led to the increasing consumers’ concern about the overall safety of GMOs. In several protests, Consumers have expressed their concerns about the lack of premarket safety evaluation of GMOs and also called for mandatory GMO labeling, but to no avail. In many occasions, the FDA has declined to address the consumers’ concerns. To date, the FDA has maintained its 1992 GMO policy, explaining that they have resource limitations and other regulatory priorities to address any safety evaluation and labeling issues regarding GM products (Landa, 2014).…
A common concern in the agriculture industry is the public 's concern on GMOs. The public is very uneducated on the stance of GM products. By conducting this survey our goal is to educate the general public about GM products. When emailing Monsanto about GM crops one of the questions asked was “How long have GM products been used?” Monsanto 's response, “Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) aren’t just about food.…
Finally, labeling should be a very important part being made in a product in the GMO industry, making sure people understand how dangerous it truly is for us. Also major companies that work with GMOs are starting to monopolize their own products to increase productivity with their own farming using biotechnology. The result of this will mean farmers will have to start buying these seeds instead. If GMO use is going to be here to stay then the government should create laws that will force these companies to have labels, not protect them, and force that are creating and using these products. With the amount of known effects Genetically Modified Organisms Should not be allowed in our foods today.…
Labeling should not be used as a scarlet letter in order to support a political point of view on GMO’s. Science, not emotion should rule in matters of public safety. We have government regulators working in concert with producers of GMO’s to insure only safe products are introduced into the marketplace. Government agencies have a sworn duty to protect consumers and producers have an economic stake in assuring their products are indeed safe. Their track record in this regard is stellar.…
Miller is a physician and molecular biologist who believes that there can be plenty of harm done by putting GMO food labels on produce at the supermarket. In Miller’s article, “GMO Food Labels are Meaningless,” he disagrees with the Vermont Act 120 that requires labels on foods that have been produced or partially produced from an organism in which the genetic material has been changed. The Vermont law was passed to reduce and prevent confusion among consumers, yet Miller opposes this idea. Miller reports, “Activists may believe they are empowering consumers, but in truth they are distracting them from substantive issues such as product quality, safety, and value.” Miller writes that since the early 1900’s plant breeders have been testing and performing “wide-cross” hybridizations on plants and cultivating those with desirable traits.…
Many of the produce we consumed from the grocery stores are by products of GMO. They are not required to be label as an GMO product due to the lack of regulation. Many people believe the benefits of GMOS outweigh the unknown risk of GMO consumption. The lack of evidence in studies done or labelling is due to the lack of the regulation required by the government. One of the greatest known company that produces GMO is Monsanto.…
Eighty one percent said that labeling GMO products is a health and safety issue. According to other sources 9/10 U.S. consumers want to know if their food has been genetically modified (Stonebrook). People will notice and care this new information, 82% of people surveyed said that they usually or always read labels (Branson). If labeling were required for GM foods it would not go unnoticed, and that is why it is being demanded. Only 43% were aware that GM food is in super markets right now, and 26% believed that they have never eaten GM foods or ingredients (Branson).…
Many authors have opposing positions on this topic as no laws have been done recently regarding the tagging of these foods. As in the article written by Carole Bartolotto, “Why Genetically Modified Foods Should be Labeled “ explains the reasons in why the labeling of GMOs should happen. While on the other hand in the article, “Why We Shouldn't Label GMO Foods” written by Josh Davis exposes the reasoning of why these GMOs shouldn't be identified. As these two articles bring out the different opinions among the health and environment concerns, they also question themselves of whom these labelings benefit. With the common grounds that biotech companies don't want the labelings of the genetic modified foods as well as the perception that there needs to be more experimentation with these foods that contain…
In addition, GMO foods lacking labeling that most people believe that GMO’s food should be labeled because of food allergies. People think they have right to know what they are consuming. Second, a problem of GMO food is negative impact on the environment. The article “Dangers to the Environment” describe studies have shown that pesticide-producing crops contaminate nearby streams, possibly affecting aquatic life. The toxins produced by these GM crops are far stronger than any found in nature, and are produced throughout the plant.…
In the article “Technology Won’t Feed the World’s Hungry,” Anuradha Mittal discusses the problems with genetically engineered food and economic issues of India. Mittal argues genetically modified food is not a solution to global hunger, because world hunger is an economic problem. I disagree, because GMOS can cure world hunger. The world is becoming more educated and tolerant of genetically modified food, such that any health concerns about GMOS are outweighed by the benefits. There are various kinds of GMOS, however I will be discussing GMOS as it relates to agriculture needs.…
They say the crops are environmentally safe and practically the same thing as an organic plant. For that reason they don’t believe GM foods should be labeled and consumers shouldn 't know. It has a very big impact because it could be very dangerous to eat because of all the unknown things about GM foods. Since there is so much about GM foods to be discovered and how it affect the human body the severity could be drastic. The scope of the problem is people just want to have the ability to know if what they are eating and feeding their family is a GM food.…
Genetically modified organisms also known as GMOs have been an area of hot debate over the last few years. In this article we will explore the arguments for and against GMOs and at the end dispel the fear-mongering and show that humanity has been modified organisms since the beginning of recorded human history; we are just much better and faster at it now than in the past 1,000s years. The goal in GMOs is to modify organisms (generally food stock such as livestock and extensive agriculture, plants), at the genetic level, to obtain better quality offspring. Companies such as Monsanto and other agriculture, industrial giants aim to create plants that taste better, have better nutrition qualities, are resistant to drought, pest, and other environmental…