Individualism: A Sociological Analysis

The problem of economic in the gilded age was proper administration of wealth. In this days, the rich rule over the poor; the master rule over the servant. Compared to the Indians, where they were civilized and worked together in a cottage, the Americans appreciated their caste and laissez-faire economy. Each of the caste does not have any sympathy towards each other, therefore forming a mutual distrust and ignorance. Instead of working together, the rich care more about the money instead of their workers, and so do the workers. They care too much for themselves, making both of their relationship rigid. It results in a friction between employer and the employed. However, it is different if a master and his apprentice work together like nowadays. …show more content…
Communism, Socialist, or Anarchist have seeks to overturn the conditions to make a better civilization, but every single one of them turn futile. All of them have been tried resulting in not evil, but good results from the accumulation of wealth by those that have the ability to do so. Individualism, however, should be avoided people had to derive their happiness, not just from striving for personal needs, but also for each other. Sociological idealism instead gives a chance to evolve and modernizes our generation together. But not everything runs perfectly as …show more content…
First, it can be left to the descendants of the family, either to the oldest son or equally towards others. However this particular choice is unwise. In monarchial countries, some successors become doomed and their countries perished because it falls into the wrong hands. It is not supposed to fall into people without talent or ambition. It is part of misguided affection of a dad towards his child. Second, donate the money after death for public uses. In this case, it makes the individual known as the philanthropist that helps poor man and becomes much better in the face of the society. However, in a lot of cases, the money is not correctly processed. It is only used as a proof of helping people without properly using the money to help people as much as possible. Also, it could be translated with other meaning. If those money could be brought to the next world, they would not had left and donate a huge parts of it. In the third case, the money is spent to become the property of many. The poorest can afford to see this. It helps the life of many people, without actually giving them money and makes them rely on the money to be