Foolish or Honorable?
Chris McCandless’s journey outlined by the novel Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer supports that it is simple and indisputable to apprehend that McCandless was not a heroic figure, just one persuaded by inaccurate decisions. McCandless was not your average student, he had a very bright future ahead of him graduating with high honors from one of the country's most prestigious universities; Emory University, however, threw it all down the drain when he took an everlasting adventure hiking into the Alaskan bush unprepared and alone. Many perceive him to be a hero, leaving the social norms one is expected to carry out throughout life, but, many also view him as a fool who wasted all this god given talent, just to die a cold hearted death. What could persuade a human …show more content…
His actions were not honorable and his decisions were those of a child. As a young headstrong man filled with hubris, he entered the harsh bush with little preparation. Running away from civilization, McCandless was like many other young men and women who travel to Alaska. He was disoriented, exasperated with societal prospects, probing for an adventure and a peregrination that would provide enlightenment.. An edifier from the Arctic circle expressed his noetic conceptions on McCandless, “I’ve run into several McCandless types out in the country… idealistic, energetic young guys who overestimated themselves, underestimated the country, and ended up in trouble. McCandless was hardly unique.” This type of reproval outlines the doleful truth of the story of Chris McCandless. He was not a special case. Chris’ story of his avoidable death was glorified by the media. Into The Wild is not a following of fairy tale ending. The novel is a admonishing tale utilizing the tragic story of Chris McCandless, “a reckless idiot, wacko, narcissist, who perished out of arrogance and stupidity.” (Krakauer's Note). Krakours efforts to redeem McCandless words
Chris McCandless’s journey outlined by the novel Into The Wild by Jon Krakauer supports that it is simple and indisputable to apprehend that McCandless was not a heroic figure, just one persuaded by inaccurate decisions. McCandless was not your average student, he had a very bright future ahead of him graduating with high honors from one of the country's most prestigious universities; Emory University, however, threw it all down the drain when he took an everlasting adventure hiking into the Alaskan bush unprepared and alone. Many perceive him to be a hero, leaving the social norms one is expected to carry out throughout life, but, many also view him as a fool who wasted all this god given talent, just to die a cold hearted death. What could persuade a human …show more content…
His actions were not honorable and his decisions were those of a child. As a young headstrong man filled with hubris, he entered the harsh bush with little preparation. Running away from civilization, McCandless was like many other young men and women who travel to Alaska. He was disoriented, exasperated with societal prospects, probing for an adventure and a peregrination that would provide enlightenment.. An edifier from the Arctic circle expressed his noetic conceptions on McCandless, “I’ve run into several McCandless types out in the country… idealistic, energetic young guys who overestimated themselves, underestimated the country, and ended up in trouble. McCandless was hardly unique.” This type of reproval outlines the doleful truth of the story of Chris McCandless. He was not a special case. Chris’ story of his avoidable death was glorified by the media. Into The Wild is not a following of fairy tale ending. The novel is a admonishing tale utilizing the tragic story of Chris McCandless, “a reckless idiot, wacko, narcissist, who perished out of arrogance and stupidity.” (Krakauer's Note). Krakours efforts to redeem McCandless words