Janet Lorin’s article College Tutition in the Us Again Rises Faster Than Inflation, she claims that college prices are increasing rapidly in comparison to the rate of inflation. Lorin includes statistics, quotes from one on one interviews, direct quotes from other articles, and one graph at the top of the article. The graph is unused within the article itself and is visibly small making it hard for readers to understand the use of the graph. Lorin uses four resources to support her article. The sources are well incorporated within her article and prove her point. In College Tuition in the US Again Rises Faster Than Inflation by Janet Lorin published in the Bloomington News effectively proves her point with the variety of creditable sources
…show more content…
Lorin uses the data from the College Board often. She quotes Baum and Jennifer eight times in her article. The source “is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization that connects students to college success and opportunity” (Baum and Ma). The Board is informing potential and current college students of the current trends. Being founded in 1900, the Board has been assisting students for over a hundred years. The authors of this article are creditable. Sandy Baum is a professor and teaches higher education finance and policies. She has her doctorate and has been published fifteen times. The second author, Jennifer Ma has her doctorate in economics and is a research economist and policy researcher. This source is creditable because the organization itself wants college students to succeed and the authors are extremely qualified in their fields of study as well as their job …show more content…
Ben is a “senior policy analyst” (Lorin). The foundation “is dedicated to the renewal of American politics, prosperity, and purpose in the digital age through big ideas, technological innovation, next generation politics, and creative engagement with broad audiences” (“New America”). The foundation has been active for sixteen year and focuses of public policy issues. The company is not on either side of the issue of tuition making the company unbiased. Mr. Miller is unbiased as well because of his professional standing as a senior analyst. Lorin had to have an interview with Mr. Miller because an article to support what Lorin provided was not found as well as Lorin credits Miller by using “said” (Lorin) instead of states insinuating she spoke to him. Miller is a professional which is shown by his status as senior analyst making him a creditable source.
Lorin’s next source is the U. S. Census Bureau in the September 2014 report. This source is creditable because this is a government site. The Bureau has been taking censuses since 1790. The method of collecting information has changed over the years, but the information has been kept unbiased for the use of statistic information. The source has no side to take on the issue of college tuition. Many individuals work on government reports which takes out the personal opinions. There is no on author for government reports giving no one person credit but
Lorin uses the data from the College Board often. She quotes Baum and Jennifer eight times in her article. The source “is a mission-driven not-for-profit organization that connects students to college success and opportunity” (Baum and Ma). The Board is informing potential and current college students of the current trends. Being founded in 1900, the Board has been assisting students for over a hundred years. The authors of this article are creditable. Sandy Baum is a professor and teaches higher education finance and policies. She has her doctorate and has been published fifteen times. The second author, Jennifer Ma has her doctorate in economics and is a research economist and policy researcher. This source is creditable because the organization itself wants college students to succeed and the authors are extremely qualified in their fields of study as well as their job …show more content…
Ben is a “senior policy analyst” (Lorin). The foundation “is dedicated to the renewal of American politics, prosperity, and purpose in the digital age through big ideas, technological innovation, next generation politics, and creative engagement with broad audiences” (“New America”). The foundation has been active for sixteen year and focuses of public policy issues. The company is not on either side of the issue of tuition making the company unbiased. Mr. Miller is unbiased as well because of his professional standing as a senior analyst. Lorin had to have an interview with Mr. Miller because an article to support what Lorin provided was not found as well as Lorin credits Miller by using “said” (Lorin) instead of states insinuating she spoke to him. Miller is a professional which is shown by his status as senior analyst making him a creditable source.
Lorin’s next source is the U. S. Census Bureau in the September 2014 report. This source is creditable because this is a government site. The Bureau has been taking censuses since 1790. The method of collecting information has changed over the years, but the information has been kept unbiased for the use of statistic information. The source has no side to take on the issue of college tuition. Many individuals work on government reports which takes out the personal opinions. There is no on author for government reports giving no one person credit but