Jean-Paul Sartre's Definition Of The Self

Superior Essays
Throughout history, philosophers have debated about a predetermined essence of the self. A vast amount of these philosophers have argued for the immorality of the soul and for its composition to be something different than that of the body, placed within us in order to make us human. With these theories, the prime source of evidence is God, or some other spiritual entity directing the fate of humankind in one way or another. Jean-Paul Sartre has a different approach to this, arguing that we alone are responsible for what is to come next and that our essence is entirely what we make of ourselves. This essay will argue that Sartre’s definition of the self is correct in that he focuses on the centrality of human choice and the existence of man …show more content…
Because we have freedom to choose, we are the only ones there to take responsibility for not only our own actions, but that of mankind as well. Sartre is considered to be a humanist. Meaning, he focuses on the dignity of the human race in terms of its ability of free will. This is central to Sartre’s definition of the self. He also focuses on this in terms of the whole race. Because there is no God, there is no one to take responsibly. Our choices will define who we are and all of mankind as a whole. We are responsible for the future of mankind (Sartre 321). Iddo Landau of Philosophy Today expands on Sartre notion of freedom, demonstrating the limits of this concept. Landau points out these limitations in freedom by demonstrating that while a person may have the freedom to choose, the freedom to obtain is entirely out of their control (Landau). Sartre is aware of these limitations and accounts for them by providing an antidote of a boy who has to chose between staying with his mother and fighting for his country (Sartre 322). Sartre knows that in this scenario there might not necessarily be a “good” choice to make. Because there is no God, there is no one there to help him make his choice. Sartre realizes that because of the limitations and because nothing is predetermined, the boy cannot change his situation, he can only chose one or the other. Similarly, this freedom of choice affects the relationship between the self and the world. Because mankind can choose, mankind can determine the future of the world. This is not to say, that to be a self requires the reliance of others, only that we do all interact in one way or another. Ultimately, the central focus of the self according to Sartre is human

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Then all of a sudden, someone tries to grab their attention because that person was blocking the way for others to pass. They get embarrassed, and feel ashamed. This person displays this emotion because how those other individuals perceived them. With this analogy, Sartre shows that an individual does not exist alone…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tangible Items

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I concur with him on the grounds that materialistic things are decent to have, they don't characterize who you are. One must figure out how to be modest, and take ownership of things other than objects. One must take a gander at oneself from inside and expert different qualities, thinking that what will happen when you lose all your "significant belongings" ? your identity and great deeds are all that you will have cleared out. Sartre's perspective that our aptitudes are things we claim is most convincing of all of them.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The existentialist theory emphasizes choice and free will of a person and the individual will determine their own outcomes based on choice. Jean-Paul Sartre was a leading philosopher of existentialism and believed that there are no blueprints to one’s individual life. There is no purpose rather than to find their own purpose and build upon it. We are a product of our choices and we are who we choose to be. We determine our fate which determines our freedom.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Paul Sartre is a strong proponent of Existentialism which asserts that “existence precedes essence” (682). To expand upon this, Sartre believes in absolute free will where our essence, which can be defined as our human character, is created by the actions our lifetime. To defend this claim, Sartre provides three key arguments to show that “man…[is] the ensemble of his acts” (690). Sartre’s first argument is that there is no determined human nature to make us do what we do, or to excuse what we do. This simply means that a preexisting human nature, which is another term for essence, doesn’t exist and can’t control what a person will do or become.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialist’s (as set out by Sartre and De Beauvoir) positions on the meaning and value of human life. Which is the best supported position (be sure to give reasons for your judgment), and what problems does it still face? How might it respond to these problems? In this essay I will compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialists’, specifically Sartre and De Beauvoir, positions on the meaning and value of human life.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As stated in the text about Sartre, I believe that each person is responsible for everything that they are and will become; humankind can shape ourselves. With this sense of responsibility, human beings have the freedom to life live as they wish as long as they know that all the benefits, and consequences, of their actions will be due to their own decisions and nothing else. While obviously, one cannot choose their own family members or when they will be born; each person is responsible for their own emotions and…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First being, the attempt for Chris to discover his meaning and purpose as you would if you were an existentialist. The second, is Sartre’s perspective upon the responsibility for what man says and how he chooses to live. This philosophy is also explored by Chris McCandless when committing to his new lifestyle. In terms of hunting for food, shelter, warmth and water in order to survive. Sartre also wanted to make clear the connection between the negative perspective toward the view of existentialism and the more optimistic perspective in which he believed in and wanted to display within his works as McCandless did as well.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kierkegaard, Camus, and Sartre are three main philosophers that have overlapping ideas of Existentialism. Throughout Kierkegaard 's book Fear and Trembling, Camus’ book Absurd Creation, and Sartre’s book Existentialism and play No exit, the idea of the ability for one to make one’s own choices and decisions through free will is shown. These philosophers opened my eyes to a new perspective on what existence precedes essence means. While reading these books, I agreed with some ideas as opposed to others. I related with Camus’ thoughts on being able to change the way one thinks and with Sartre’s thoughts on existence preceding essence.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The 3rd Reflective Essay Amr Eid Radwan Are we free? - Exploration of Will by Exploiting D’Holbach’s Arguments - P eople always want to believe that they are free. But is this the truth? Are we the ones who determine their fates? Are there any external factors that cause our actions?…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean Paul Sartre Analysis

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He suggests that our decision should be free from everything, since our decisions define ourselves. Sartre gives a study case in his writing by telling the story of a Frenchman. The story is about a man deciding either to join the military forces or to take care of his elderly mother. Sartre’s recommendation is not to listen to anyone but to decide on his own, so he can be truly authentic. Being a true human is to have responsibility for who we are and entirely responsible for what we do.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sartre’s view that existence precedes essence states that we decide who we want to be as individuals due to the fact that we are simply nothing in the beginning. The view emphasizes utilizing the free will that all individuals possess to create their own path for what the future entails. Nothing is determined in this viewpoint, therefore individuals become self-aware and responsible of who they are. Lastly, individuals decide what they want to believe and base their actions upon this preconceived idea. One reason Sartre believes we are so free because our freedom is inescapable and is required to establish ourselves compared to others.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sartre Religion

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Assuming an understanding of Sartre’s division of the Being in-itself from the Being for-itself and the characterization of the being for-itself with its relation to nothingness, we may advance a description of Sartre’s concept of bad faith as a lie to ourselves in which we attempt to construct our Being into a “little God” (Sartre, 1984, pp. 81) by asserting our essence in the Being in-itself while maintaining our transcendence. This comes as a desire to assuage the anguish brought upon by the nothingness characterizing the inalienable freedom deriving from the transcendent nature of the Being for-itself. Sartre likens bad faith to deceiving oneself in order to escape from the anguish present in the face of one’s freedom. Sartre offers many examples himself of how we practice bad faith—the woman in the café, the waiter, the homosexual—but in seeing how bad faith is practiced in a myriad of…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Libertarianism also said humans have no special purpose in their life. Let’s analyze the idea of libertarianism. Are humans really completely free from, nature, societies, feelings, emotions, desires, or actions? The truth is, humans are not completely free from anything, as libertarianism believes. Sartre said, “We can tell ourselves that other forces make us do what we do, but this is a form of bad faith.”…

    • 1965 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Who or what defines human nature? How do human beings shape and create their existence? Humankind is a benevolent species that is fueled by compassion, empathy, kindness, love, and many other emotions that allow people to care for those around them. As a result, human beings are constantly creating and reshaping their existence simultaneously through the choices they make. However, the ability to freely choose and decide can bring positive or negative outcomes on behalf of humankind.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Hell is - other people!” (No Exit, 45). This line serves as the main structure of existential philosophy. Existentialist philosophy is based on the belief that a person makes their own decisions and is responsible for the consequences of those actions and choices. “…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays