Jon Krakauer Analysis

I support Jon Krakauer because he experienced deaths and suffered but he made it to the summit and went back down. He made it to Camp 4 but the others weren’t there yet one of them made it to camp 4 and stayed with Krakauer. Although he had doubts of Everest he wanted to make it to the summit but people from his group died on Everest, he wished he never climbed Everest.

Jon wrote an article of Mount Everest and his experience there. He cared for his group but he worried about himself mostly, I think he was a hero but he did what he needed to do for the group even when he didn’t have oxygen. His story was later published from Outside Magazine.

Jon may have mistaken Lopsang’s age and misspelled his name but he was telling his story of what he saw and experienced on Everest. Lopsang doesn’t really understand Jon because he was telling his side of the story. Jon was trying to be truthful but he might’ve changed the story up a bit so nothing would be revealed to the people that wasn’t supposed to be revealed some people like Jon have leave some parts of the story out maybe he just changed Lopsang’s name and age to not reveal his real name. …show more content…
Jon may have wrote some mistakes about Anatoli but maybe he wanted to switch up the story a little bit, even though Jon shouldn’t be assuming other people’s stories and experience he still felt the need Anatoli did what he did. It was also Anatoli’s choice to go with oxygen or