Julius Caesar Ethos Pathos Logos

Improved Essays
In the two speeches made by Brutus and Antony at Caesar’s funeral, both characters used different methods in persuading the audience. Taking into mind who the audience was, what they knew about what had occurred, and how the information was presented all contributed to the way that the audience perceived it. While Brutus used more logos, or the use of logic and reason, while Antony used pathos to appeal to the Roman people’s emotions (Delaney). Both speeches also used different rhetorical devices to sway the crowd. With that being said, one speech proved more effective than the other. The first speech made was spoken by Brutus after Caesar’s murder. Brutus went through to say that Caesar was too ambitious, and for that reason …show more content…
Throughout Antony’s speech, he used ethos to provide evidence that Caesar did not deserve to be murdered. Antony refers back to when Caesar denied the crown, and says an ambitious man would have jumped at the opportunity (III, ii, 97-100). Antony also uses logos to support his credibility, saying that he knew Caesar and he was a good man who did not earn his tragic fate. Antony also calls the audience “friends” in his opening line of his speech. He does this to make the crowd feel that Antony is one of them, and that he is trustworthy. While comparing his speech to Brutus’s, Antony gives his true intent discreetly, instead of coming out into the open quite like Brutus. Antony also sarcastically uses the word “honorable” to describe Brutus and the conspirators by mocking them and how the people view them (III, ii, …show more content…
Studies show that during a debate, going last is better because that person then has an opportunity to persuade the audience by countering arguments made by their predecessors (Taking Full Advantage). Antony also had more experience in delivering speeches, and was a better orator than Brutus. Knowing who he was talking to and what their education level of the matter was turned out to be crucial in the overall outcome. Also, Brutus told the people that the death of Caesar gave them their freedom from becoming slaves, but Antony told the people of Caesar’s will, which gave them each an amount of 75 drachmas (III, ii, 242-244). The audience did not care so much about the possibility of them becoming slaves as much as they cared about the money they would be receiving. Antony also provoked the crowd by telling them of Caesar’s will, but did not want to read them it in fears that it would “stir up” the people (III, ii, 212). This only made the crowd want to hear it more, which is exactly the reaction that the skilled orator Antony hoped for and expected from the easily swayed Roman people. This is ironic as Antony says Brutus is a skilled orator, while obviously he is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony, in his eulogy, presented himself as filled with grief and loss; however, a form of subliminal persuasion and manipulation is used to sway the Roman people in his favor. The loyal friend of Caesar appeared to be supportive of the conspirators, but his devotion to the true king never wavered. While he praised the conspirators for being “such honorable men”, Antony admitted how he grieved for his friend. He utilized paralipsis in his cajolery, stating that “I speak not to disprove what Brutus spoke, / But here I am to speak what I do know.”…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His private arbors, and new-planted orchards” (3.2.247-249). Antony is trying to show the people that someone who is ambitious would not leave all of his land to the people beneath him. Antony's use of logos throughout his speech helped to convince the people that Caesar was not…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony fosters a strong sense of emotion in his compelling speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral to the Roman people in Act III, scene ii, lines 74-147. Antony prefaces the deliverance of his speech by calling Brutus and Cassius’ honorability into consideration, but ultimately criticizes them and ignites a fire of rage within the citizens of Rome. This scene occurs shortly after the assassination of Caesar. At this point, the Roman people hold the conspirators in high regard as the narrative of the execution is characterized as being for the benefit of the city. Throughout Antony’s speech, however, public opinion shifts dramatically against the conspirators.…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, the outcomes of both speeches to the crowd are very different from each other. Each speech was very thought out and read greatly. However, Antony came in as the winner of the crowd. The reason why he did was because he moved the crowd emotionally as Brutus just told the crowd why they did kill Caesar, like an informational speech.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the crowd kept a positive attitude towards Caesar's murder, then Brutus would have become the new ruler of Rome and would have still been alive, along with the other conspirators. Instead, the crowd believed in the negative ideas Mark Antony was feeding them, and they decided to kill and run the conspirators out of the city. Overall, Mark Antony's speech and his use of rhetorical devices was more powerful than Brutus' speech, and made the ending of the tragedy the way it…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After close examination it is clear to see that Antony's use of Ethos, Pathos, and logos is far more persuasive than Brutus argument. Anthony's words strike the word of Brutos. At the beginning of Brutus's speech, he instantly uses ethos by telling the people to remember his honor, which is effective and catches the audience's attention. He remind the audience of his wisdom so they will more easily believe him.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Concluding his speech, Antony finally gets a rise from the others which means trouble for those who had murdered Caesar. Brutus gave his reasoning at first, and he had the crowd on his side, but that quickly changed once Antony spoke. Antony had a better usage of rhetoric in his words, therefore the crowd sided with…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has the intelligence to take advantage of Brutus’ naïve nature by convincing the conspirators of his allegiance to the conspiracy, and of his support of the murder of his friend. He takes each of their hands, and assures them, “Friends am I with you all and love you all,” (Act III, Scene 1, line 232). Antony is able to utilize his intelligence and sincerity, along with his many other traits, in ways that persuade and motivate people. During his funeral oration, Antony repeats, “But Brutus says he was ambitious; And Brutus is an honourable man,” (Act III, Scene 2, lines 85-86). Saying this shows that he is courageous in addition to his intelligent, for he openly mocks Brutus in front of the plebeians.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Act III, Antony stands in front of the group of Plebeians after they have just listened to Brutus, the conspirator’s, reasonings as to why Caesar deserved his death. Mark Antony uses compelling rhetoric, to switch their mindsets, so the commoners pledge to his words instead of Brutus’s. Some may believe Brutus’s leadership skills make him a great speaker, but Mark Antony’s powerful, raw words…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony agrees to Brutus’s request at the moment. In his speech he strategically uses logic, persuasion, and emotion on the audience to turn them towards himself and Caesar.…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The word honorable is repeated all throughout Antony’s speech which, eventually, changes the thoughts of the crowd. In this case, Pathos is shown because Antony put in the minds of the crowd that Brutus is not one to trust and not honorable, making the fickle crowd angry at Brutus for his actions. In addition, Antony also repeated the word ambitious, in order to defend Caesar. As a matter of fact, Antony states “Did this in Caesar seem ambitious? When that the poor have cried, Caesar hath wept.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another example of a rhetorical question in Brutus's speech is when Brutus says "Who is here so vile that will not love his country?" In that last quote notice he started with "Who is here" He say that many times in the speech which is repetition for impact, he uses this to persuade the crowd. That device works as a list to make it seem like there were many reasons for the assassination and he keeps reinforcing his opinions with repetition. Brutus also explained that he didn't hate Caesar, but that he loved Rome more. He says "Not that I loved Caesar less, but I loved Rome more" this shows it would have been hard to kill Caesar, as he loved him, but he is so sure it is right he had to killed him.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Shakespeare 's Julius Caesar, Marc Antony had the herculean task of turning the Roman population against Brutus and the other conspirators. To do this, Antony needed to follow up Brutus ' powerful oration with a short, supervised speech. Still, in little time Antony had turned the tides and had the Plebeians on his side. He had used certain devices in his speech, several of which include equalization, repetition, emotion, humility, irony, inflation, and anticipation, to aid in his success. Antony 's strategies worked like a charm, and even before his funeral oration had finished he and the conspirators all knew who had the upper hand.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays