Since the dawn of humanity, we humans have used classes, structures, clans, factions, societies, and any other form of exclusion and connection to be able to operate as a single entity. Our societies and communities have generated extreme measures of grouping and monotony among itself. Any differences or changes to it lead to highly adverse ramifications towards the individual or entire group with the association. Societies are bound together through a convoluted formation and perpetuation scheme that ensures that the orders, guidelines, and values that are currently found in a society, will last for many more generations or adherents to follow. To begin with, the idea of how our societies have socialized is entire based on the fact we
…show more content…
Economic growth, social mobility, technological advancements, and political stability are all key aspects of the lives we have, and all are outcomes from the separation humans have experienced from the access to opportunity and strict zones they have been socialized to operate and function in. Karl Marx, a highly accredited sociologist and philosopher, expressed his opinions on that there has to be a strict system of checks and balances to ensure prosperity for everyone (p. 3). This means that in order for the whole group to succeed, certain aspects of opportunity and acceptance must be either revoked or granted from specific groups. Even though this seems harsh, Marx proves his case by giving an example of how a plethora of freedom and lack of control would turn to utter anarchy, regression, and annihilation of what we have succeeded to invent and progress for our prosperity and future. Because we must have a system and power, innately, to function and operate as a group, socialization and stratification have naturally succeeded in their mission to ensure dominance of humanity. Yet, certain ethics may be damaged, such as the separation of genders, sexes, ethnicities, etc. the greater society or community in the end will balance out the bad with good. However, even though it seems that inequality makes classes, structure, and progression, as noted from our prong longed history of its implementation, how will do we know if this process is the only and best way to succeed if we haven’t tried anything new and
Economic growth, social mobility, technological advancements, and political stability are all key aspects of the lives we have, and all are outcomes from the separation humans have experienced from the access to opportunity and strict zones they have been socialized to operate and function in. Karl Marx, a highly accredited sociologist and philosopher, expressed his opinions on that there has to be a strict system of checks and balances to ensure prosperity for everyone (p. 3). This means that in order for the whole group to succeed, certain aspects of opportunity and acceptance must be either revoked or granted from specific groups. Even though this seems harsh, Marx proves his case by giving an example of how a plethora of freedom and lack of control would turn to utter anarchy, regression, and annihilation of what we have succeeded to invent and progress for our prosperity and future. Because we must have a system and power, innately, to function and operate as a group, socialization and stratification have naturally succeeded in their mission to ensure dominance of humanity. Yet, certain ethics may be damaged, such as the separation of genders, sexes, ethnicities, etc. the greater society or community in the end will balance out the bad with good. However, even though it seems that inequality makes classes, structure, and progression, as noted from our prong longed history of its implementation, how will do we know if this process is the only and best way to succeed if we haven’t tried anything new and