Numa Plutarch: A Good Ruler

Improved Essays
In Plutarch’s Lives, four men were introduced: Romulus, Numa Pompilius, Coriolanus, and Caesar. However, out of these four, Numa proved to be a superior leader. Unlike the other three rulers, Numa Pompilius was a virtuous, moral, and humble man who led a life free of luxury. He was devoted to piety and philosophy and was a religious man who made worship of the gods his priority. The people also found him to be an excellent counselor and an honest judge who showed intelligence in his decisions and actions. When Numa Pompilius was elected to be ruler of Rome, he declined because he loved the personal life he led. After much persuasion from father, kinsmen, and electors, Numa accepted the crown of Rome. Numa showed his great governing skills during his time as emperor, who helped reconstruct both politics and religion. He tore down immoral laws and established new righteous laws in their place. The most important actions he accomplished during his time as ruler, was the uniting of the Romans and the Sabines. Numa proved by his actions that he was a better ruler.
Numa showed great morality in his decisions and his actions. He changed laws in the name of morality. Plutarch writes saying that Numa commanded, “the repeal or rather amendment of the law which gives power to fathers to sell their
…show more content…
There was constant friction between the two races. Numa came to realize that if the conflict between the people continued, a civil war could break out and possibly destroy Rome. To resolve this problem, Numa divided the city into trade guilds including, goldsmiths, shoemakers, carpenters, blacksmiths, and others . He gave each guild a plot of land, their governance, and religious ways. Once Numa did this, no one was thought or spoken of a Roman or Sabine, but were now identified by his guild. All feelings of resentment towards the other disappeared, and the city was a made

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plutarch vs. Shakespeare: Was Caesar a Good Man? According to the great philosopher Plato, “the measure of a man is what he does with power”. While we know a lot about Julius Caesar’s legendary military and political career; his character is more or less unknown. Was he a ruthless, ambitious dictator; or was he a wise leader whose ultimate concern was for his loyal subjects?…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He did other things that gave him the support of many such as introducing festivals and increasing trade. His leadership was similar to the reformer Solon, but when Solon came back he wanted to get rid of Peisistratus. Doing all of this, Peisistratus gained lots…

    • 140 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marcus Cocceius Nerva was born in what was once the small town of Narnia, Italy in the year 30 AD. He was born into a family who was no stranger to holding positions of high power. However, Nerva had no intention of ever becoming emperor himself. During that time, Nerva was almost accused of treason by Domitian. Those plotting against Domitian, used this knowledge to have Nerva agree to take the role of emperor after Domitian’s death.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order for us to answer this question, we got to understand who Plutarch was and the type of man he was. Plutarch was a Greek historian, biographer, and essayist. He was known for his writings on Parallel Lives and Moralia. Plutarch wrote about Caesar and Alexander the Great just to name a few.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great is known as the King of Macedonia and conqueror of the Persian Empire. One of the writers of Alexander, Plutarch was ethnically Greek, but a citizen of Rome. The author takes famous Greek characters and compares them to Roman characters in his biographies; he has created the romantic picture of Alexander and used the story of Alexander to exemplify what is good leadership, and he does emphasize certain values that would be consider good qualities found in a leader, and the outcome of the use of such qualities. Being biased towards the Greeks, Plutarch successfully made his readers to believe that Alexander is a perfect model of leader by emphasizing maturity (insight) and ambition (courage) of Alexander, and by distorting…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A Ruler for Rome Out of all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus was the one ruler who expressed characteristics of a true ruler. Numa displayed morality known by all. He was a peacemaker, which made his kingdom a prosperous and joyful one. Numa not only built on top of Romulus’s work, but he made it a better, happier, and bigger kingdom. Above all the rulers in Plutarch’s Lives, Numa Pompilus showed morality, good judgment, and self sacrifice.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction: Suetonius and Augustus Suetonius’ approach to biography is elucidated by centring focus on the Life of Augustus. Suetonius rose to prominence as a scholar, and later gained positions in Hadrian’s court, with his work The Twelve Caesars dated tentatively to the reign of Hadrian between 117-38 C.E. He did not write in a chronological style like his contemporary Plutarch, but rather divided his work thematically, into categories such as birth, achievements, career, morals and death, although the structure varied within his work. One of the proposed reasons for this structure is that Suetonius was inspired by Augustus’ Res Gestae. Erik Gunderson argues that Suetonius used Augustus’ Res Gestae as an exempla, while his section on…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Antony and Cleopatra, displayed was a powerful love between two people at the climax of their trials and tribulations. Plutarch ‘Life of Antonius’ is the primary source, and Shakespeare has combined this factual evidence together along with fiction and drama to formulate a play that is different in terms of proposition, structure and notability. In the first century AD, less than one hundred years after Antony’s death ; but just in time to hear his grandfather’s personal experiences about the battle of Actium, also from Antony’s altruistic engaging in Alexandria. He was a Greek philosopher, and so his congeniality ran more in direction of his fellow countrymen than the Roman subjects of his regid studies.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Alexander the Great was a significant historical figure who was as great a commander as his name suggests. Whether it be his two million square miles of conquered land, or his contribution to science through his expeditions, he certainly was one of the most important people of his time. In fact, Alexander the Great had such a lasting effect, the era after him was named “The Hellenistic Period”, from Hellas, which is the word for Greece. Alexander the Great was a fearsome figure of the ancient times, who had conquered Egypt, Central Asia, and had even beat Persia’s army. Historical evidence suggests that Darius III, the then king of Persia, had set the battlefield to his favor.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Spartan tradition dictates that lawgiver Lycurgus introduced the reforms. It is believed that before Lycurgus, Sparta was in a state of “strife between the rich and poor .” Tradition states that Lycurgus had “divine assistance” from the sanction of Delphi when he created his reforms and Strabo comments “Lycurgus received laws from Apollo .” This “divine intervention” could be stressed, as Plutarch highlights, for the Spartan state to be accepting and implement the reforms that reflected Lycurgus’ morals . The “divine inspiration ” appears to give the reforms an ‘approval’ by the gods who are guiding Sparta to success.…

    • 118 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fall of the Republic was caused not only by one individual’s actions or one event but a culmination of several actions from different individuals and events. Unfortunately, some influenced massively in the Roman society. There Large and quick expansions from Rome’s foundation as an underdeveloped city; creating enormous holes in the governing and political ability in the Senate. While the powerful individuals of Roman mob like the general were jockeyed for position. The Roman life was facing differences far more rapidly than the governing body could manage.…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "On Sparta" Book Review Plutarch 's take on the history of "On Sparta" was written in such a way that readers may not take every piece of information literally. One may be led to believe that Plutarch wrote this book with the idea that he was not trying to be historically correct. The exaggerated parts of the lives of Lycurgus, Agesilaus, Agis, and Cleomenes should be understood as more of a fable rather than an actual piece of history. “On Sparta" has a great balance between the lives and sayings of Spartan men and women sections. The Sayings section is almost comical.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Livy Vs Plutarch Analysis

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    His background as a prominent philosopher are more than likely the root of his broad themes and reasons for looking at history as a series of cause and effect rather than just chronologically listing the events themselves. The introduction of “The Makers of Rome” wasn 't written by Plutarch, but it does layout the main themes of Rome as an invincible military force, and the power struggle between Plebeians and Patricians. (Pg. 5-6) This method of taking a step back and trying to relate events is, in a way, more effective at describing the material to the audience, but also doesn 't go as in depth with details. The other benefit is that Plutarch is able to draw his own philosophical ideas and opinions into the mix and present Rome in whatever light he wishes. Being a prod Roman, he chooses to portray Rome as having great leaders by selectively writing about certain great politicians, one such politician is Tiberius Gracchus.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meritocracy is where there is a ruling of the educated and skilled, the power held was equal to the ability of a person. Within the book Rubicon: The Last Years of the Roman Republic by Tom Holland there were some instances where it highlights such things being portrayed, as there were common men who would come into higher power through their skills and abilities. As there were some Romans who had a thirst for power and an unending ambition, that eventually leads to the fall of the Roman Empire. The Republic of Rome was a meritocracy as people would gain power depending on their skills and abilities, the Emperors that would come into power gave less opportunity of such things occurring.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Titus Maccius Plautus was a Roman playwright who leads huge influence on theatre development. He mainly wrote comedies. His comedies based on Greek comedies and it’s fascinating because of its humorous. Meanwhile, Plautus was also engaging in social criticism because the five plays reflected some social problem of the Roman society.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays