Machiavelli The Prince Research Paper

Improved Essays
In Machiavelli's The Prince, Machiavelli instructs people wanting to gain political power should be more concerned with what is politically effective rather than what is morally right. Machiavelli encourages readers to do whatever is necessary to gain and keep power. While Machiavelli's methods seem harsh and extreme and I personally don't believe that they are ethically right, I believe they would allow a ruler to accomplish his goals of obtaining power.

During the Renaissance when Machiavelli lived, there was an explosion of humanism and free thinking that focused on the individual person. In writing The Prince, Machiavelli exercised his right to say what he pleased and to let the world hear it.Just like the people around him, Machiavelli was focusing on himself and his goals, abilities, and views, no matter how cruel they might seem. In this way Machiavelli was swept up into the Renaissance spirit. While other people wrote
…show more content…
In places such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia in the Middle East, one can see one of Machiavelli's ideas. In The Prince, Machiavelli writes that a ruler should focus on "war and it rules and disciplines" above all else. He writes that, in order to keep power, "it is much safer to be feared than loved." Today there are countries constantly at war and for it their people to obey through fear. While this has proved to be a way for these rulers to maintain their power, they also have last the admiration of their people. Although there are places in the world today that rule using some of Machiavelli's ideas, I don't believe that these techniques should be used in the modern world as a way to keep power. This sort of leadership leads to distrust between an ruler and his people and and the idea that your government doesn't have the best intentions for the well being of individual people and is only concerned with keeping the area under their rule strong and their power

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Absolute Power DBQ

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Time and time again throughout history mankind has fought for control, for power. As a child, everyone dreamed to be able to single-handedly run the world, to have absolute power. Absolutism, or an autocracy, is when the ability to rule a nation or empire is only given to a single person, with all decisions and actions affecting the country done with the order or consent from them. Autocratic rulers often limited the power of nobles and religious authorities, used military force to expand their nation’s borders, created laws, and distributed justice as it was seen fit (Document 1). Lord Acton, an English historian, had once said “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.”…

    • 1670 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolò Machiavelli and Alvar Núñez Cabeza de Vaca went through different experiences that led them to have their own perspectives in human nature and create their ideals for good governance. The simple fact that Cabeza de Vaca was unfortunate enough to have a hard time throughout the expedition made him more open minded about human nature, while Machiavelli had a set idea of what human nature was and how it ties to good governance. Machiavelli's view on human nature is the same as what is a good governance a good leader and a good human being is someone who knows how to be respected and feared without being hated and how that leads to have the people the Prince governs happy and on his side. Cabeza de Vaca has a more down to earth view on human nature but that differs…

    • 2016 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Morals of the Prince is written by Italian diplomat Niccolo Machiavelli; in which it was published as “The Prince,” in 1532 during the Renaissance era. Many of Machiavelli’s theories are birthed from the encounters of the Medici dynasty. Machiavelli wrote The Prince to exhibit how Princes ought to live versus how they truly live in terms of dealing with their subjects and friends. Machiavelli executes his claims successfully through the use of rhetorical appeals portrayed in this treatise.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘In the social sciences, the most general concept of power links it to the ability to achieve a desired outcome’ (Heywood 2004). Power is a heavily contested concept amongst humans and has always been present within political thought throughout all eras. It is, in most cases, outlined as the capability to impose authority upon both individuals, and the masses within a state or territorial region, in order to control or influence decisions and their effects. This essay will discuss the similarities in the analysis of political power between two key philosophers from the 16th and 17th century who are thought to have founded features of modern-day political science. Both Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes specialised in theorising the idea…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Taoist and Machiavellian Government There are different communities and groups all around the world. Each one of these groups need a leader. Not every leader will lead the same way and there are different ideas about how communities should be governed and structured. Lao Tzu and Niccoló Machiavelli were two people that had their own idea of how a government should be ran.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In Niccolo 's most well-known book, The Prince, a strong emphasis is placed on the need for The Prince (or the governing body) to abandon principles and act immorally on occasion in order to achieve a particular objective (or to maintain/expand power).” Machiavelli’s impact on the U.S. especially has been more of a tougher stance. When someone thinks of Machiavelli they think of his key phrase, which is “the ends justify the means”. The meaning of this phrase is if a goal is morally important enough, you may pursue this method of achieving this goal no matter how immorally or unlawfully it may be. This phrase has had a tremendous impact on the United States especially after 9/11 and other terrorist/ domestic attacks on the U.S.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both grappling with regional instability and constant war, arrive at different frameworks for handling man’s inherent propensity for conflict from very similar models of human behavior. Hobbes, watching his fellow countrymen fight each other during the English Civil War, decided that humans perpetually desire more power to secure their well-being and therefore incline toward warfare as a means to achieve this. Machiavelli, similarly accustomed to the restless Italian Peninsula, also labeled man as power-hungry and self-centered, always striving for enough freedom to ensure one’s prosperity. In the absence of the structure and organization provided by a government, a situation dubbed mankind’s ‘natural…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is exemplified in Socrates criticism of the jury for valuing wealth and political titles as a replacement for proper moral goodness. “Are you not ashamed that you give your attention to acquiring as much money as possible, and similarly with reputation and honor, and give no attention or thought to truth and understanding and the perfection of your soul?” (56). Not only is Machiavelli an avid supporter of gaining political power, he values gaining political power through one’s own ambition and cunning above other methods like inheritance. Furthermore, his realist view of politics and wealth’s role in maintaining the state unsurprisingly leads him to the conclusion a good prince must not fear a reputation of being cheap, describing it as necessary “if he wishes to avoid robbing his subjects, if he wishes to be able to defend himself, to avoid becoming poor and contemptible, and not to be forced to become rapacious.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It will pain the state more to give away their assets than to be conservative. Machiavelli expands further on self-division through the idea of the man and the beast. He states, “A prince should, therefore, understand how to use both the man and the beast” (45). Machiavelli describes how the man represents being in accordance with the laws, but that being in accordance with the laws does not always work. Therefore, a prince must resort to ulterior methods in order achieve results.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    look at John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli John Locke and Niccole Machiavelli are two philosophers from the Renaissance period, who focused their work on creating a better society and government. Their work consists of theories of how rulers should rule their land and how they can get their subjects support. Locke’s Two Treaties of Government of Civil Government, is contrary to Machiavelli’s book The Prince. Whereas, Locke’s book is to justify the revolution of when King James II was removed from power, Machiavelli’s book is about how a ruler should exercise his power and gain control. Machiavelli’s theory is similar to dictatorship and Locke’s theory is the basis for classical liberalism.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An explanation that is potentially one of the more conventional validations of the relationship between Machiavelli’s The Prince and the Discourses is reading The Prince as a manual for the founder of what would eventually emerge as a republic. Once the prince has established a foundation of the state, the republic that Machiavelli advocates for in the Discourses will become achievable and desirable. The Prince was written to establish a unified state; the republic in the Discourses will maintain that stable and unified state. Academic Leo Strauss explains that Machiavelli wrote the Discourses to promote the imitation of ancient republics. Machiavelli longed for the rebirth of ancient republicanism .…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This book set forth the most efficient way to gain and maintain power during the Renaissance. His tactics included ideals such as: the ends justify the means, take calculated risks and rule without ethical thought. Many of the Medici ruling strategies were incredibly similar to those written in Machiavelli’s book; therefore, the actions of the Medici family directly exemplified the advice Machiavelli provided in The Prince.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    72). In other words, we would like to believe that humans always act on behalf of goodness and the benefit of others, but as history has proven numerous times, this is simply not the case. Ideally, loyalty would be unwavering and laws would govern suffice, eliminating the need to resort to force. It is for this precise reason that Machiavelli adopts the contentious beliefs still debated today. His views are not necessarily cynical, but a product of the reality of his…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays