Firstly, intervention is necessary to allow the three Muslims complaints to rebuttal to defend Muslim community. Secondly, government intervention is not needed because Steyn article does not promote hate because it is just opinion. Also, Maclean’s Magazine has the right to have free speech and has the ability to publish at their own desire. Even when the complaint was heard by Human Rights Commission it was dismissed because the article expressed opinion not hate (Brean). The three law students had an attempt to express their views on The Agenda, yet they just considered to talk about Maclean’s Magazine for not permitting the three law students view. Therefore, the moral comes to show is that one has right to express opinion regardless what other may
Firstly, intervention is necessary to allow the three Muslims complaints to rebuttal to defend Muslim community. Secondly, government intervention is not needed because Steyn article does not promote hate because it is just opinion. Also, Maclean’s Magazine has the right to have free speech and has the ability to publish at their own desire. Even when the complaint was heard by Human Rights Commission it was dismissed because the article expressed opinion not hate (Brean). The three law students had an attempt to express their views on The Agenda, yet they just considered to talk about Maclean’s Magazine for not permitting the three law students view. Therefore, the moral comes to show is that one has right to express opinion regardless what other may