In this, classical representations within the works of art will be of great importance. Byzantine art stretches back to antiquity, possessing much of what is seen in Greco-Roman art. As much of the art on the Baptistry doors depicts well-known images from the Bible, it is only understandable that the characters would favor Greco-Roman conventions. The resurrection of Greco-Roman art that is referred to here "made such an impression upon contemporaries that they saw in them the dawn of a new era…a renaissance had been achieved…of arts whose secret, they believed, had been lost for centuries” (“The Byzantine Background”). In Ghiberti’s panel, the characters are not depicted in the formerly traditional Byzantine style, but are depicted in an innovative fashion. The characters all have distinct faces and those faces are filled with relatable emotions. The characters themselves conform to much Greco-Roman sculpture that is being produced. The use of chiaroscuro, which is the use of light and shade, outlines distinct features of the forms within the panel to allow for more depth within the panel. Formerly in Byzantine art, heavy lines were used along with flat forms to create the idea of depth through the use of line, but Ghiberti uses chiaroscuro to give his three-dimensional forms a sense of life. Therefore, Ghiberti’s panels are not traditionally Byzantine, but aspects of Byzantine art …show more content…
In this, Brunelleschi seems to be the artist that best captures what Chrysoloras is looking for. As a humanist, one must focus on the “scholarly, literary, and educational ideals based on the study of classical antiquity” (“Studies on Renaissance”). Although both artists did incorporate biblical images, figures, and icons into their doors as based on antiquity, Ghiberti incorporates humanism on a different scale than Ghiberti. For example, in his depiction of the Sacrifice of Isaac, he incorporates much human emotion in the figured portrayed, as one main focus of humanism is that of a “certain emphasis on man” (“Studies on Renaissance”). The angels seem to look sincere and Abraham somewhat imploring. The image itself is bursting with peaceful movement. The angel glides forward to stop the passioned movement of Abraham’s knife that is close to ending Isaac’s life but also not yet close enough to inflict the deadly blow. The underlying tension in both the angel and Abraham is evident due to how close Abraham came to killing Isaac before the angel intervened, however there is grace in the way that Abraham cradles Isaac while he makes his decision to sacrifice Isaac. The angel moves to place a hand on Abraham’s head as if to stop him with a soft touch or a comforting word, rather than by grabbing Abraham’s arm like in