Premise (1) is true because of the …show more content…
I will describe a scenario in which we exist without bodies. Suppose that I was sitting in the library and doing my assignment. I so was focus on it that I didn’t find out my legs disappear before I finished a paragraph. Now when I looked downwards I can see the chair directly. I was surprised at this transformation and wanted to move, but just then my arms and my main body disappeared too. This is not painful but only a little scary. My friend sitting in front of me seemed terrified because now I look like a head floating in the air. I wanted to say something to comfort her. Unfortunately, I found that when I wanted to speak I can’t hear myself. Then I can see nothing but completely darkness, as if someone suddenly turn off the light at night. I was amazed by my situation and keep wondering that “what on earth is going on?” Apparently, although my body disappeared right in front of my friend’s eyes, I can’t say that I disappear as well. I still exist in nowhere, wondering and urgently wanted to come back and finish my assignment. This is an example in which I can clearly and distinctly conceive I exist without my body. Therefore, we can conceive that we exist without our body.
In conclusion, I have proved that both (1) and (2) are true. If we can exist without bodies, then we are not identical to our bodies. We can exist without our bodies, because if a thing is conceivable, then it is possible. We can conceive a scenario in which we exist without bodies, so it is possible for us to exist without bodies. If that is the case, then we are not identical to our bodies. Thus, people, such as you and I, are not bodies. Therefore, substance dualism is true. People and bodies are