First, a consequence of nuclear fission is the byproduct of nuclear waste. Some types of commonly used chemicals produce nuclear …show more content…
The issue it that the given argument only stands if one accepts the argument. Essentially, one may say that my argument is not acceptable to every, but I am, rather, simply catering to an audience that already accepts my point to view. To counter this claim, take into consideration the John Stuart Mill’s “Harm Principle.” This idea states that people are naturally born relatively free. If person one were to take freedom away from person two via harm (amputation, negligence, et cetera), then person two would not have natural born freedom. They would, rather, have a freedom which has been limited by another. This goes against the will of nature, given by the first premise. Therefore, stunting the freedom of another, dubbed as “Harm,” is typically