One of the main issues was the “camping out” on grounds, not marching or protesting in an orderly fashion, this resulted from the lack of order. With a passionate, articulate, leader, the message could have been effectively delivered in a more profound way. Second, with a distinct leader, there could have been a compromise, not by calling out the 1%, but stressing how equality is important in a democracy and that it needs to be fixed. This would have created a more reasonable way to fight for this issue and I feel the protest would have been more respected. Last, I would make sure the leader has an agenda. The anger about the divided economic classes and the constant yelling created an unsettling environment that lacked a clear, powerful, consistent message. With an agenda, not only would there be order, but the strong message they wanted to deliver would have been more profound and
One of the main issues was the “camping out” on grounds, not marching or protesting in an orderly fashion, this resulted from the lack of order. With a passionate, articulate, leader, the message could have been effectively delivered in a more profound way. Second, with a distinct leader, there could have been a compromise, not by calling out the 1%, but stressing how equality is important in a democracy and that it needs to be fixed. This would have created a more reasonable way to fight for this issue and I feel the protest would have been more respected. Last, I would make sure the leader has an agenda. The anger about the divided economic classes and the constant yelling created an unsettling environment that lacked a clear, powerful, consistent message. With an agenda, not only would there be order, but the strong message they wanted to deliver would have been more profound and