Perils Of Presidentialism

Superior Essays
In “The Perils of Presidentialism”, Juan Linz asserts that presidential democracies are more likely to fail than parliamentarian systems due to their inherent conflicting natures. Meanwhile, in parliamentary democracies such as the United Kingdom, prime ministers are elected by coalitions and although coalitions are based off multiple parties and divergent ideas they still have to give up certain concessions to form the majority. This calls for a smoother process while processing legislation. Moreover, when the prime minister loses the favor of the parliamentary majority, the parties must negotiate the terms for a new coalition and chamber. (Yglesias/ pg.4) If they fail to do so, elections are held. However, this is not the case for presidential …show more content…
This causes conflict when these critics, including Juan Linz, argue that this inherent political instability can cause democracies to fail. (Ginsberg/pg.299) For instance, during President Nixon’s office term one of the most controversial scandals in American presidency surfaced. The Watergate scandal definitely demonstrates how a president can lose his influence in office if he does not have the support of congress. Although President Nixon was not impeached he had to resign from his position because there was no doubt of the fact that the support was no longer there. …show more content…
Ginsberg affirms that the separation of powers and direct elections play a big role in the United States presidential system. The government is structured in a manner that calls for checks and balances between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. These parallel structures have kept each other from over extending supremacy. (Ginsberg/pg.47) Furthermore, in presidential democracies the president is elected directly by the constituents, rather than a prime minister appointed by a coalition. (Yglesias/ pg.2) Giving that right to the people to directly impact who is appointed president in their country can set the impression that they have more liberty and thus may help to bridge the gap between citizens and government. (Ginsberg/pg.213,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Institutional configuration of presidentialsim, bicameralism and the federalism system bring the U.S. allocation of power in line with only four other states out of the 31 state study. Additionally, an added filter that separates the U.S. framework is a common-law legal system with judicial review that can be seen in only three other states in the study. Furthermore, these two filters combined leave the U.S. as the only state out of the study that has the combination institutional parameters of persidentialism, federalism and common-law tradition with a strong judicial review. Primary elections, especially unique in the United States, are a direct result of uncentralized political parties in the U.S. electoral system and no constitutional layout for elections.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    George Washington conceptualized the presidency by believing that government must serve the people’s interest rather than benefiting themselves. For that reason, he despite the idea of an ideal party. He feared that political parties would benefit their own self-interesting instead of uniting each other. In such case, Washington asserted that the executive have to be impartial by noting that “even respectable character’ contemplated monarchy ‘without horror’ if it would rescue the nation from an otherwise inevitable factional strife and anarchy” (90). He sees himself as a vital link to his people rather remaining neutral so he can pull the country back together.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the permanent campaign has been used for decades as a part of the American politics. Permanent campaign is when elected officials after getting elected use methods like the ones they used before getting elected such as hosting rallies, media campaign, and raising money. Therefore, the indicators and the characteristics of the president’s Permanent campaign are, traveling around, discussing initiatives and issues he plans to fix, holding rallies, and registering for reelection very early. The increased attentiveness to the public during the permanent campaign is not good for the American democracy.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States of America praises their democratic system, but how democratic is it really? There is much controversy over whether the system in which the president is elected is an honest democratic policy or an unfair operation. This conflict arises due to the many faults in the Electoral College as it causes certain votes to have little to no affect on the outcome. Decisions to abolish the system are greatly influenced by an alternative process known as the National Popular Vote. With the flaws in the Electoral College and a proposed solution; next, an obvious conclusion can be made.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two Presidencies Theory

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Because the president’s requests are not always fulfilled, it may seem that the executive branch itself checks the president’s power. However, the president’s demands remain supreme in his/her branch; rebellious members of the…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are currently two different types of processes of electing a president in the United States. The two systems are the Electoral College and Direct Election both of these systems where first established back when the founding fathers also created the U.S. Constitution. The systems are a way for the government to keep their presidential voting and other political related issues well organized. Both of these are very efficient for the county, but one of them has yet a better outcome. But one of them has shown a better outcome.…

    • 453 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the beginnings of the United States, the system of democracy required the votes of the people. In fact, the United States Electoral College is a process established by the United States Constitution for the indirect election of the President of the United States and Vice President of the United States. Although, over the recent decades many people have speculated over the reliability of the electoral college, and whether it should still be a part of the voting procedure. Going back to the origins of the electoral college, Federalists believed that the people could not be trusted with voting for the executive powers due to complex complications. With plenty of controversy concerning electoral college’s validity, my paper will also direct…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College Dbq

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Electoral College The President of the United States of America is the most powerful man in the world. As the Commander-in-Chief, Leader of the represented party, and peacekeeper among the world, the President’s job is up for grabs every four years. Article II of The Constitution states, any natural born citizen who has been a resident of the United States for at least fourteen years, and above the age of thirty-five can become the President (Posner 1). In order to be elected, the candidate must first win a majority of the state’s representatives and secure the party nomination.…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A democracy is a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people, and the United States claims to have the freest and most democratic in the world. In fact, many consider the American democracy to be a shining beacon of freedom, more so than any other nation on earth. Yet, upon closer examination of the U.S. presidential election process, this claim begins to deteriorate. Due to the founding fathers’ distrust in the ability of average voters to choose a president, they created the Electoral College: a system through which each state is given a number of electors based on its number of members in Congress. State legislatures choose a set of electors who later convene to cast votes for president.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The President 's competent powers guaranteed by the Constitution are talked of in Federalist No.70 particularly the executive power (Hamilton et al pp 130-pp 151). Hamilton says that the executive provides stability as it prevents the excess of lawmaking processes and that the executive and judicial review is able to protect the executive from legislative misuse of power. This discussion is related to Hamilton 's liking of the separation of powers in Federal government, which permits the president to execute the laws and carry out their duty as a commander in-chief without being afraid of legislative encroachment on their powers. The argument is important to understanding the foundation of the presidency because it goes into detail to why the president should be in power.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well before the 20th century, Congress was in charge of the federal government. Only a handful of times did the president actually make decisions or have involvement in the process. Earlier, in the formation of the United States, the president was easily considered “chief clerk”. The increased importance of foreign policy, helped to develop the presidential powers of the 20th century. Since then, the president of the United States of America has grown to become the most powerful position our nation.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter 8 – Local vs. National Authority In Chapter 8 of Thirteen American Arguments, Fineman discusses the tensions between local and national authority. (a) List five issues that Fineman deals with directly in the book and briefly describe how each of those issues create tension between local and national authority. Hurricane Katrina revealed a fault in American politics. Although they had predicted the dangers, neither the federal government nor the state government was in command.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Republican Party is moving in a more conservative direction and the Democratic Party staying consistently liberal on major issues of public policy (Jones 2001). Particularly in congress empirical research shows the parties in our government are becoming more homogenous in their political positions, while the differences among the party’s on policy issues continues to magnify (Jones 2001). In congress alone, polarization is visible by that fact that “since 1990 more than half of the congressional votes have featured a majority of one party opposing a majority of another” (Jones 2001). This intense polarization has had major effects on the relationship between congress and the president in particular. Looking at the theory of divided government it explains that legislation is less likely to get passed when the…

    • 1004 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It does not matter what country we live; we always concern about how much power the president and the government are holding, especially in some democracy countries, such as the United States of America. In American Democracy in Peril, Hudson’s main argument regarding chapter one Separation of Powers, is American current system of government is inefficient, unaccountable, and unresponsive, and he suggests that a Parliamentary system is adopted in order to solve Pandora’s Box as government and achieve new program, which is to help the majority to achieve what they need. Does Parliamentary system function well on American government system? In my opinion, Parliamentary system is still developing. It is a good system, but it is not exactly solving most political issues in America.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of the most celebrated forms of democracy, the "Westminster model" has been a defining feature of the British political system for the past century. Coined after the location where the Houses of Parliament stand, the system is also sometimes referred to as the majoritarian model, in that majority rule is a central attribute of the model. The characterising factors of the model have been present throughout modern British political history, but more apparent in some years than others. The years 1945-1970 symbolise a strong alignment with the main features of the model, in which bare majority cabinets and the concentration of executive power in one party delineated the British political system. The 1970s on the other hand saw a deviation…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays