The United States should implement the use of body-worn cameras to each police department to document every encounter between the police and the public.
I. Since America was first discovered, law enforcement has played an important role in the development of the American culture.
A. Law enforcement is needed to maintain order.
1. Police officers protect and serve the public in many ways.
2. America would be in complete uncontrolled chaos without law enforcement officers.
B. Americas first known police officers was established in Boston when the first colonist where settling in around 1630 that consisted of a “Watch.”
1. There were ranks and titles among the watchmen. …show more content…
Public support or opposition for police officers can have an impact on the communities that police patrol.
1. In areas where the police are respected, the people of the community are more likely to assist the police with their missions.
2. More violence acts towards police officers occur in areas where the police do not have good relations with the public.
B. Compared to other countries, the United States has the highest rate of police officer in the line of duty deaths.
1. Studies of European and Asian Countries show less police officer corruption in these areas.
2. Both European and Asian countries have less of a police officer presents in the communities and lower crime rates.
3.
C. In the United States, police officers are responsible for more killings compared to other countries.
D. Police officers in the United States are required to wear the most uniform items compared to other countries.
IV. Specific documented events caught on camera over the years of police abusing their power in America, has had a wide variety of outcomes by the communities.
A. The Rodney King beating of 1991 was among the first time in American history where there was a public uprising against the police and brought weakness to the ongoing pattern of the LAPD abuse of …show more content…
Body-worn police cameras help speed up court proceedings.
B. Opponents of body-worn police cameras cite the cost to implement and maintain body-worn police cameras as their main argument.
1. Many police departments do not currently have a budget in place that accounts for the cost of implementing body worn cameras.
2. Tax payers ultimately pay for police body-worn cameras.
3. The government should reimburse law enforcement agencies once they have implemented body-worn cameras.
4. Most opponents of body-worn police cameras use invasion of privacy as their argument.
IX. I support the implementation of body-worn cameras because I believe in any technology that’s used as a means of checks and balances between members of authority and those that are not.
A. Through personal firsthand experience with the police I’ve learned that there is three sides to every story.
1. Studies show that witnessing or going through a traumatic event can alter your memory of that event.
2. Body-worn police cameras offer a third side to every police encounter with the public.
3. Body-worn police cameras are crucial in instances where the alleged victim/ perp is no longer living.
B. Body worn cameras protect the police and the