The definition of Queer is broad and inconsistent. Many researchers have elected to let the reader define Queer. The use of Queer theory is used broadly; however, readers are required to deduce their own definition of Queer based on the discussion of Queer theory by the author(s). For the purpose of this piece, this researcher will utilize several discussions and applications of Queer theory to develop their own definition of Queer identity itself.
In developing their “Queer of Color Critique,” Brockenbrough (2015) discusses Queer theory as a framework that is concerned with “the disruptive possibilities of transgressive gender and sexual formation amidst patriarchal and heteronormative regimes” (p. 30). From this, one may conclude that …show more content…
One may also conclude that Queer identification is inherently political due to its deviation from and contention with both patriarchal and heteronormative systems. Jones and Calafell (2012) critique the dichotomous framework of hetersexuality versus non-heterosexuality in discussing queer theory (p. 973). They argue that this binary construction of sexuality “left out people who are heterosexual but may also be queer in terms of how their multiple identities, aside from sexual orientation, impact their lived experience” (Jones & Calafell, 2012, p. 973). This suggests the Queer is not defined by one’s sexuality; rather, it is constructed through any identity that is in contention with systems …show more content…
There is an office focussed on services for Latinx students, an office focussed on Black/African American students, and so on. The office that this researcher is interested in is the Pride Resource Center (Pride). Pride’s mission is to provide “resources and support for all CSU community members to explore and increase their understanding of sexual/romantic orientation, gender, and identity intersection,” and their vision is “to create inclusive and respectful environments and experiences to Colorado State University” (https://prideresourcecenter.colostate.edu/). Pride is an office that is focused, therefore, on Queer
In developing their “Queer of Color Critique,” Brockenbrough (2015) discusses Queer theory as a framework that is concerned with “the disruptive possibilities of transgressive gender and sexual formation amidst patriarchal and heteronormative regimes” (p. 30). From this, one may conclude that …show more content…
One may also conclude that Queer identification is inherently political due to its deviation from and contention with both patriarchal and heteronormative systems. Jones and Calafell (2012) critique the dichotomous framework of hetersexuality versus non-heterosexuality in discussing queer theory (p. 973). They argue that this binary construction of sexuality “left out people who are heterosexual but may also be queer in terms of how their multiple identities, aside from sexual orientation, impact their lived experience” (Jones & Calafell, 2012, p. 973). This suggests the Queer is not defined by one’s sexuality; rather, it is constructed through any identity that is in contention with systems …show more content…
There is an office focussed on services for Latinx students, an office focussed on Black/African American students, and so on. The office that this researcher is interested in is the Pride Resource Center (Pride). Pride’s mission is to provide “resources and support for all CSU community members to explore and increase their understanding of sexual/romantic orientation, gender, and identity intersection,” and their vision is “to create inclusive and respectful environments and experiences to Colorado State University” (https://prideresourcecenter.colostate.edu/). Pride is an office that is focused, therefore, on Queer