Subjectivity and Identity often refer to one’s sense of being. The relationship between identity and subjectivity often displays people’s sense of being and ideologies. Identity often gives people a sense of being or a changeable personality, creating a way for individuals to explain themselves to society. Subjectivity builds on the belief that identity itself is often flawed, as it cannot be understood by the human perspective. The relationship between the two is also shown to display an extension of the other as identity involves personal perspectives and ideologies where subjectivity insinuates limitations on identity.
2. What does Hall suggest about the relationship …show more content…
Descartes thoughts of “I think therefore I am” often disputes the idea of a god or divine being, which ultimately shatters the idea of immortality. His idea often holds individuals responsible for their own actions, that they cannot blame a divine being for their mistakes. Descartes’ idea of agency challenges the religious standpoint of a god, because nothing, from Descartes’ perspective may or may not exist. Descartes questions often shake the idea of a religion and hold people responsible for their actions, rather than have a scapegoat through religion. Descartes often creates doubt within the need of divine …show more content…
As human beings it is easy to fall into violent habits that were established prior to the scientific and intellectual advances but Locke states that by assessing a problem without violence is something that should be explored. Exploring non-violence is something that needed to be perfected or watched. I think Locke implies we take responsibility for our actions, in which reason and control are often the best way to become a better person rather than violence and power. Taylor writes that Locke’s ultimate goal is to create social beings who use brain over bronze.
5. What is Hall's critique of Kant's Categorical Imperative?
Kant has a moral sense of duty. His ideologies concept applies to a personal sense of right and wrong. Kant presents a moral dilemma that enforces the idea of circumstances. Hall critiques the claim, saying Kant often thought that the idea was to have simple pleasure and to recreate. Hall criticizes the claim that a sense of duty and morality in right and wrong are often challenged with the sense of duty. Hall criticizes the idea of over confidence and morality. Hall tends to also criticize Kant’s philosophy on rational behavior are often drastic and