Her description of the struggles and the working conditions of a child laborer forces the audience to confront their emotions on the issue using phrases such as “They aren't even allowed to stand up and stretch”, the swiftly drawing attention of the reader to the fact that they are only viewing the issue from the prism of their own beliefs and values with the clever reference to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, highlighting the ludicrous idea “that someone could actually prefer bread to freedom”. In my opinion for rhetoric to be truly persuasive the writer must on be on some common ground with the audience and that is the most interesting part about the article. Even though Chita’s is writing an anti-bill article, she goes to great lengths describe the awful nature of child labor, expressing sympathies with the children and narrating their stories in order to let the audience know that she is on their side and feels the same way about the
Her description of the struggles and the working conditions of a child laborer forces the audience to confront their emotions on the issue using phrases such as “They aren't even allowed to stand up and stretch”, the swiftly drawing attention of the reader to the fact that they are only viewing the issue from the prism of their own beliefs and values with the clever reference to Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, highlighting the ludicrous idea “that someone could actually prefer bread to freedom”. In my opinion for rhetoric to be truly persuasive the writer must on be on some common ground with the audience and that is the most interesting part about the article. Even though Chita’s is writing an anti-bill article, she goes to great lengths describe the awful nature of child labor, expressing sympathies with the children and narrating their stories in order to let the audience know that she is on their side and feels the same way about the