Sheila Fitzpatrick’s The Russian Revolution and Richard Pipes’ Three “Whys” of The Russian Revolution are examples demonstrating some of the conflicting…
Russian Revolution succeeded their chant more than the French Revolution Diego De La Cruz Towards the end of the 1700’s there was a revolution that started all revolutions. The American revolution showed many people that anyone can win a revolution and this revolution started many revolutions in the future. The French revolution another example of corrupt government that was to be overthrew by the people. The same goes for the Russian Revolution where Nicholas II had many events that made the people of Russia not trust Nicholas II and the ideals of an absolute monarchy anymore.…
In July of 1918, Nicholas II -- the last tsar of Russia -- was murdered, and the killer is still unknown to this day. The historical fiction novel, The Kitchen Boy, displays Robert Zimmerman’s hypothesis on the the events that transpired on July 16th, 1918. The Russian commoners rebuke the tsar for the way in which he is running the government. These civilians demonstrate their anger through rioting in the streets. Using these historical events, Zimmerman exemplifies a myriad of accuracies and inaccuracies about the life and death of Nicholas II.…
The political shift that occurred during the early twentieth century in Russia remains one of the most successful anti-monarchal revolutions in history. The political and social climate leading up to the February and October Revolutions of 1917 was unique, fueled by tense relations between the Russian working class and the royal family. It was the detrimental political missteps by Tsar Nicholas II, as well as his inability to compromise and unwavering desire to retain autocratic control of the nation, which led to the overwrought bond between the monarchy and the common-folk. The removal of the Romanov family from their prestigious throne was a direct result of the divide that Tsar Nicholas II created between the monarchy and the working class.…
Nicholas II played a vital, negative role in contributing to his complete downfall during the early 20th century. His reluctance to become Tsar was a major factor that contributed to his own demise. The release of the October Manifesto in 1905 was one of the key events that led to the end of Tsar Nicholas’s rule over Russia. Tsar Nicholas’s poor leadership in World War 1 as well as his weak-willed personality was also issues that further contributed to the collapse of the Romanov Dynasty. These factors and events severely influenced the political, social and economic aspects of his ruling .The…
Joseph Stalin also reduced the rights of many Russians. Many Russians also lost their lives under the rule of Joseph Stalin. In order to determine whether the Russian Revolution was a success or failure it is important that we consider numerous aspects. Based on the five texts provided Animal Farm (Chapters IX-X), by George Orwell, an excerpt from “Education, Literacy, and the Russian Revolution” by Megan Behrent, “Stalin and the Communist Party…
The dramatic downfall of Tsar Nicholas was the ended the Romanov dynasty in Russia. It ended autocracy as a political system in Russia and lead to the creation of the Soviet Union which went on to spark major tensions with the world in the Cold War. This historical turning point shaped much of 20th century history and the lives of over 293 million people. In between this huge political drama and cataclysmic revolution appears a most mysterious and dark individual who has become a legend in Russian history.…
The question he sought to answer with his research is what did the Allied intervention accomplish in the Russian Revolution? He came to the conclusion that it was a failure upon the fact that the intervention was based upon “misinformation, profound geographical and political misconceptions, and a generous supply of wishful thinking.” However, the intervention was impactful. He analyzes the reasons for intervention, what occurred, and the major players behind the event. To answer his question, he uses sources from the Public Record Office, National Archives, US Army Military History Institute, US Military Academy Library, and the Bentley Historical Library.…
Conformity is a type of social influence that involves changing one's opinion to fit into a group. Herd Behavior describes large numbers of people acting similarly to a situation. The difference between the two is Conformity is the reason Herd Behavior occurs. One example of Herd Behavior in the Russian Revolution is Lenin's Propaganda. Lenin's Propaganda caused thousands of soldiers to betray Russia and join the rebellious Bolsheviks.…
Human nature, eat or be eaten. This statement proves to be true because humans are alive today as a product of instinct. The weak die and the strong survive. The biology of humans leaks into society, influencing their choices every day. Events have occurred, laws have been passed, and wars have even been fought in order to secure safety for men, women, and their nations.…
In the Russian Revolution of 1917, there was a class of people known as the bourgeoisie. “The English word 'bourgeoisie' is derived from the French word 'bourgeoisie' meaning "... the trading middle class"(MARXISM).” The Russian bourgeoisie in 1917 were basically a class of capitalist, landowning, and wealthy people. They wanted things to change just like everyone else but they expected things to still stay wonderful for them.…
The people of Germany resented the government for signing and agreeing to the harsh terms and conditions of the Treaty of Versailles. Most of Germany was left in shock as they now had to adapt to harsh change. Antony Wood, British historian argues that “the Germans saw this treaty as a sign of humiliation and did everything in its power to overturn it”. The extreme left, the Spartacists led by Karl Liebknecht and Rosa Luxemburg were anti-war, anti-parliamentarian and were ready to use illegal means to start a revolution. Since Wilhelm had been abdicated, for the first time Germany was considered to have no law and order.…
If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…
The revolutions in Russia during 1917, particularly the February Revolution, 'grew out of prewar political and economic instability, technological backwardness, and fundamental social divisions, coupled with gross mismanagement of the war effort, continuing military defeats' and the inadequacy of the Tsar and his government. However, whilst it was these factors combined that resulted in the Russian Revolution, the primary factor…
Revolution according to the Webster Dictionary "is a sudden, extreme or complete change in the way people live work etc". During the World War 1 Russia witnessed the transition to a different and renewed that brought with itself some good and bad consequences; however it is necessary to analyze and understand each phase of the process in order to create a concept and a point of view. The Russian revolution has three main causes: political, social and economics.…