Shapira V. Union National Bank Case Summary

Decent Essays
Shapira v. Union National Bank

Citation:
39 Ohio Misc. 28, 315 N.E.2d 825 (Com. Pl. 1974)
Facts:
David Shapira died and left a will and three children. The three children were named David Jacob Shapira, Mark Shapira and Ruth Shapira. David Shapira Sr. stated in his will that all of his children would get a third of the estate if certain specified conditions were met for the two sons. The two sons would have a period of 7 years to find and marry a Jewish woman with both of her parents being Jewish as well in order to inherit their portion of the estate. David Jacob Shapira filed suit stating that the conditions placed in the will were a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.
The trial court

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    SCOTT V. CARPANZANO United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit, 556 Fed. Appx 288 (2014) FACTS: Rick Scott deposited $2 million in an escrow account into Salvatore Carpanzano’s company. Because of his violation of the escrow agreement, his funds were withdrawn. Scott was not able to recover his money so filed a suit Salvatore Carpanzano, which included his daughter Carmela Carpanzano. Scott did not make any allegations on Carmela’s part.…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Korematsu v. United States (check) (signifigant) Do the President and Congress have the power to excluded United States Citizens of Japanese’s descents without violating the Fifth Amendment, Due Process Clause, and the Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause? After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor in 1942, The American Military became concerned about the Security of the United States. With General DeWitt’s recommendation, President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Executive order 9066, “authorizing the removal of any or all people from military areas, as deemed necessary or desirable”. After this order was passed Fred Korematsu, an American born citizen of Japanese decent, had some facial surgery, changed his names and claimed to be…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carter V. Tokai Financial Services, Inc. In the case, it follows Randy P. Carter and Tokai Financial services, Inc. where Tokai sued Carter for money that was not given under a lease agreement that the two had entered. It as stated that ARC made 4 of the rental payments before they defaulted on the obligation they had with Tokai. Following the ceasing of payment, Tokai the repossessed the equipment and sold it for $5,900. After the sale, Tokai brought a suit against in which they were awarded $56,675.74.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrity vs. New Jersey Case Study Critique One Tracey Green CJUS 530 Liberty University ABSTRACT The Fifth Amendment establishes various rights within the criminal and civil courts. When it comes to criminal cases the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury and prevents double jeopardy and it also protects against self-incrimination. Also, it implements due process to be a part of any legal proceedings that would deny a citizen life, liberty or property and requires the government to compensate a citizen when private property is taken for public use.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, 2005 SCC 13, [2005] 1S.C.R. 188 is considered very controversial as it questions the national public health concern that is caused by the smoke of tobacco and can affect our youth in a negative way. What this cases focuses on is s. 6 of the Saskatchewan Tobacco Control act and how by the virtue of the paramountcy doctrine is inoperative due to the fact of s. 30 of the federal tobacco Act. The doctrine of paramountcy establishes that where there is a conflict between valid provincial and the federal law or its purpose, the federal law will prevail. Furthermore, s. 30 of the federal tobacco act allows retail stores to display tobacco and tobacco product-related brand elements and post…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V. Tran, 2010 SCC 58

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Supreme Court of Canada is the foundation of Canadian Law in our society. It keeps the criminals at bay, and the innocent free. In my opinion, the Supreme Court of Canada does it’s job in upholding a high standard of effectiveness and success. It effectively balances the rights of individuals against the needs of society The case R v. Tran, 2010 SCC 58, [2010] 3 S.CE. 350 clearly portrays the effectiveness of the Supreme Court of Canada.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Brian Shaffer Case Summary

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Within this case a student Brian Schaffer, who has been diagnosed with a learning disabilities and speech-language impairments has been under the IDEA program since prekindergarten through seventh grade. In which time he attended a private school and struggled academically (Goldberg, Schaffer v. Weast, 546 U. S. (2005), 2012). In 1997, school officials informed Brian's mother that he needed a school that could better accommodate his needs. Brian's parents contacted respondent Montgomery County Public Schools System (MCPS) seeking a placement for him for the following school year.…

    • 1127 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The court is likely to find that the tweet made about Chef Luna was defamatory per se. In order to be considered defamatory per se, a statement must be obviously and clearly damaging. In re Lipsky. To be obviously damaging, it must be damaging in and of itself, without relying on outside evidence to prove that the statement harmed the plaintiff. KTRK Television, INC. v Theaola Robinson.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The nature of the article is to address the ethical implications of a legal case against the counseling profession by Ward -vs-Wilbanks. Ms. Ward was a graduate student enrolled at EMU in the clinical counseling program during her practicum. During such time, Ms. Ward refused to render services to a client because of her values and religious beliefs; therefore she referred the client to another student. The ACA standard prohibits such practice especially when the counselor’s values are inconsistence with the client’s goals or are discriminatory in nature as this case was. This conflict became evident when Ms. Ward was suspended from the program indefinitely.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historically, the Supreme Court has made many bad decision where it chose to not strike down oppressive rights of racial minorities such as cases like Korematsu v. U.S. which allowed the removal of Japanese-American from the West Coast during WWII or the case of Plessy v. Ferguson which allowed racial segregation. Public opinion enacts some restrictions on unfair policies but with a government as large and complex as ours, many of its abuses are not known to voters, because we generally pay little attention to public policy if it doesn’t affect us. Also, some of the worst abuses target groups disliked by mainstream public opinion, such as unpopular ethnic and religious minorities. This was the case with Korematsu v. U.S., which I think the…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fair Lending Case Summary

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Prior to the 1970s, discriminatory lending practices became hidden produces in central cities across the nation. The origins of fair lending litigation can be traced back to a 1976 redlining case in Oakley, Cincinnati. It was not until 1968, when the Fair Housing Act and other federal provisions regarding discrimination became law binding. A precedent regarding the application and interpretation of the anti-discrimination provisions was waiting to be set for local neighborhoods in the United States. Robert Laufman, a leading Cincinnati civil rights attorney, would be the one to set such a precedent by brining the first fair lending case to the federal courtroom.…

    • 2018 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the Supreme Court rulings such as in the Dred Scott case, the North and South fought numerous times over slavery. The North feared the many potential consequences of this case. The South was reluctant to give up slavery for various reasons. The Dred Scott v. Sandford case set precedent for other cases with similar conflicts. This case also provided reasons for the Civil War to occur between the North and South.…

    • 2004 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bell vs. Buck case was a very sensitive topic during its time due to the concept that feeble-minded individuals should not pass on their genes. It led to many controversies: some agreed with it and others believed it was unethical, however, one must fully understand the reasons why the Supreme Court went through with the decision. There are several cultural values that support the Supreme Court’s decision including prevention, balance, and responsibility. The first value which appears to be the most prominent is responsibility.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The policy (or main issue beyond addressing secondary issues such as right to amend a complaint etc.) at issue in the cases of Tenuto v. Lederle (1997) , Safer v. Estate of Pack (1996) , and Molloy v. Meier (2006) is at which length do physicians have to notifying family (hereditary offspring), close associates, or those in contact with a patient of disease transmission; either through genetic heredity or by contact with a communicable pathogen. In all three cases, the policy is consistent as the three cases all dealt with a physician’s duty to warn others beyond the patient themselves- even if it seemed to violate the privacy rules normally expected in a physician-patient relationship.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays