Should People Be Caged In Or Set Free Essay

Superior Essays
Should people be caged in, or set free? This is a question that many philosophers, researchers, or anyone, take sides to over the years. Is the human species naturally good or evil? The answer lies in the beliefs of the individual. Does anyone believe in the goodness of us? Indeed there is, and his name is John Locke. Locke is an English philosopher who thought that humans are inherently good, cooperative, selfless, and responsible. His idea of a successful government was one the people were their own rulers. He believed in the goodness of humans as a whole, and believed that everyone had the right of life, liberty and property from birth. He believed that people are naturally righteous because of the instinctual and instilled goodness in …show more content…
Hobbes also believed that people must be stripped of freedom from birth. However without our natural rights, we would not grow as a species. People couldn’t give ideas, feel free to try things, or oppose when something felt wrong. People would just feel useless, and why then should we learn, grow, and expand our world? People enjoy freedom, it lets them be human. People have proven that we are good, parents take care of their young, adults manage themselves and create their own lives, and people cooperate and respect each other in their communities, such as sports teams or business teams. After all where would people be without our ability to cooperate and build trust and teams? Locke believed that all humans are born with certain natural rights. These rights are of liberty, property and life. People should be free, and not have a demanding force limiting our natural curiosity and diversity. People would not get anywhere in advances with such restrictions and distrust. After all, relationships are built on trust. People also deserve territory, just as any other animal has his own guarded place if desired. It gives us the bit of power and privacy that most like to possess. It is a natural right for a reason. Finally, we deserve life. As a whole, humans have evolved to grow and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Locke believed in the Social Contract Theory, which stated that if people choose to have government then they are entering a contract that allows legitimate authority to be in power. However, in doing so, the people will lose a few rights. The people can also revolt and overthrow that government if said government failed to protect the rights of their citizens. (p. 15) It is also important to note that Locke was mainly interested in protecting private property and did not particularly care about voter turnout, unlike Loeb or Hobbes.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages

    He believed that no person was born bad, but rather as a blank slate to be molded and shaped by their own life experiences, also known as Tabula Rasa. Locke also thought that everyone was born with the natural right to life, liberty, and property. Sound familiar? This idea later influenced the structure of the government we know in…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke believed that all men were created equal and should be treated that way. He stated, “We must consider, what state all men are naturally in, and that is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons…” (Doc A) He’s saying that all men are in a perfect state of freedom to do as they want, which includes creating their own government and to get rid of the governments that are failing. “They have not only a right to get out of a failed government but to prevent it.”…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rebellion Dbq

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He said that God gave every man natural rights. These rights could not be taken away for any reason by anyone, even if that someone was royalty or an institution the royalty had created. Locke believed that anyone who worked in the “commons” (essentially anywhere…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some people believe that complete freedom will bring chaos to individuals because humans need some sort of leadership, and some believe that freedom brings only opportunities to show how great some people truly are. These two contrasting views on freedom are explained through the philosophical texts and views of Martin Luther King Jr and Thomas Hobbes. Martin Luther King Jr enlightened the entire world with his views in Love, Law and Civil Disobedience and Thomas Hobbes showed the world a new side of political philosophy with his work in Leviathan. In both of these works one can see the contrasting views on freedom and can judge what influenced these views based on the time period that these philosophers lived.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Rights Vs Feminism

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As stated by Locke, “To understand political power aright, and derive it from its original, we must consider what estate all men are naturally in, and this is, a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of Nature, without asking leave or depending upon the will of any other man” (Roots of Wisdom Pg. 365). Consequently, Locke believed that citizen should organize to protect their natural rights, to ensure that these right are not being abused by people of power or the government. As a result, Locke developed a social contract that states that the government and its people had mutual responsibilities in protecting these rights. On the other hand, Locke believed that “living in a state may entail consent to a social contract, but if the state abuses the power entrusted to it by its citizens, they retain the right to rebel” (Roots of Wisdom Pg.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mass incarceration is a unique way of saying that the United States has locked up a tremendous amount of the population in state and federal prisons, and even local jails. The U.S currently locks over 2.2 million human beings in cages, and many are for nonviolent offenses. What is this issue about? Mass incarceration rates continue to rise. There are spaces in the prisons and jails where there are situations such as no beds available.…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sole purpose of prison is to punish criminals for crimes they have committed, protect citizens from crime, and rehabilitate those individuals to be honest, law-abiding citizens once they are released back into the public. Wilbert Rideau, author of “Why Prisons Don’t Work”, was in the Louisiana State Penitentiary and has first-hand experience with how the prison system works. Prison is the punishment, but the punishments within the prison are inhumane and ineffective. High re-offense rates show that the public is not being protected from criminals; nor, are they rehabilitating those individuals to be productive citizens. Prisons are harming the individuals inside of them more than helping, prisons do not work.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Incarceration In Prisons

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Far too many Americans are stuck behind bars. There are currently five times as many people incarcerated now than there were in 1970.The war on drug got out of control, meaning that many nonviolent people wound up in prison. Mandatory minimum sentencing laws led to a throw-away the key culture,with long,cruel and pointless destructive prison times. That has cause our prisons to be overcrowded. “Lots of people are having their life destroy, not because they have to,but because we have chosen to ignore a basic commit to justice and equality.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Locke And Hobbes

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Locke believed in a legitimate government that had a social contract. That the people would give up some freedom and in exchange the government had to provide them with protection.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John locke is an enlightenment thinker and thought that all people were born with certain rights. Such as a right to life, freedom, and to acquire one’s own property. Certain rights are suppose to keep a society from rebelling against the government. John locke’s idea was that everyone should have a chance to gain their natural rights from the government. John Locke also claimed that if a government was using too much power, the people could rebel against the government and be replaced.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He was positive towards human nature and believed that humans were born with natural rights. He expressed his beliefs in documents called Two Treaties of Government and The Second Treatise of Civil Government. “Man being born, as has been proved, with a title to perfect freedom, and an uncontrolled enjoyment of all the rights and privileges of the law of nature, equally with any other man…” is a quote from The Second Treatise of Civil Government. It is shown in both documents that Locke believed that governments were formed only to maintain and protect natural rights. He disagreed with the idea of an absolute monarchy, but instead said that limited power was more effective.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In it men have perfect and complete liberty to conduct their life as they best determine, free from the interference of others. However, this doesn’t mean that men are free to do anything they please, or even anything they assume to be on their interest. Although there is no authority or government to punish individuals for disobedience, the State of nature is not a state without morality. Beings are presumed to be equal to one another, and therefore equally capable of discovering and bounding by the Law of Nature provided by God. In Locke’s view, these laws established the basis of all morality and commanded that we respect others especially in regards to their “life, health, liberty, or…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question surrounding the United States today is should prisoners have rights and if they should what rights do they deserve to have and which ones should be stripped away from them. Some people believe that if a person commits a crime that they do not deserve to have any rights at all, but others may argue that everyone even a criminal should have some type of rights given to them. Prisoners must have several basic rights because they cannot fend for themselves while behind bars. When prisoners go into the prison system they give up their privacy and fundamental rights, but still remain with their basic human rights.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A reason why people aren’t free is because of fear. There is a saying in Hobbes philosophy which said, “Even the ‘weakest’ could kill the ‘strongest’ men are equal.” Locke believed in state of nature, men exist in complete freedom. Men are free to do whatever they desire. The state of nature…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays