Silence In Chaim Potok's The Chosen

Improved Essays
In Chaim Potok’s The Chosen, Danny Saunders questions the value of raising children in silence. Ironically, due to the fact that Danny’s father has imposed silence upon their relationship, Danny comes to realize how valuable talking can be to his personal growth. By the end of the story, he no longer believes in his father’s strict Hasidic views.
The silence between Danny and Reb Saunders forces Danny to find other people to talk to. These people expose him to new ideas, ideas that his father wouldn’t talk to him about. One of the first people that Danny meets is Reuven Malter. The second time Danny visits Reuven in the hospital, he says, “I didn’t so much mind you being angry, what I thought was rotten was the way you wouldn’t let me talk”
…show more content…
As Danny learns more about Sigmund Freud and his ideas, he realizes that he is more interested in making sense of people’s thoughts than studying religion. Part of Freudian theory involves understanding one’s own thoughts. As a result, Danny explains to Reuven, “Whenever I do or see something I don’t understand, I like to think about it until I understand it” (66). Danny tries very hard to make sense of his thoughts, and talking about them helps him in contrast to being silent. He finds psychoanalysis particularly interesting because it involves talking. The way that Danny is so open to Freudian theory sets him apart from Reuven. Reuven says, “Freud contradicted everything I had ever learned. What I found particularly upsetting was the fact that Danny didn’t seem to have rejected what Freud taught” (195). Danny is open-minded and enjoys reading and studying Freud’s ideas, especially because they contrast with the ideas that his father introduces him to. He realizes that he can learn from these new ideas and that he would prefer to talk with people about their thought processes and feelings over continuing his father’s dynasty. Through talking about other people’s thought processes and feelings, Danny better understands himself,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    When Danny tells Reuven about it, he has difficulty even comprehending it, “I’d hate to have my father not talk to me.” (116) Parents need to leave the door open for their children to vent their feelings by talking, and Reb completely slams that door shut. This is simply not a smart way to go about parenting, which is why nobody does…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Reb Saunders has a standard for thinking mystically and spiritually, while Mr. Malter thinks logically. Furthermore, the Reb concerns himself by worrying about how Danny’s influences outside of the ultra-Orthodox affect his belief; thus, he separates Danny from Reuven because of David Malter’s view of Zionism. Also, concerning the silence Reb Saunders sets between his son and himself, the Reb believes that words twist and conceal one’s true intent; therefore, he forces his son to look into himself to find the answers of his questions instead of going to him for answers. In one of the last scenes of the book, Reb Saunders talks about how his father did the same to him and that Reb Saunders himself was sorry to Danny about how he raised him somberly saying, “A—a wiser father… may have done differently. I am not…wise.”…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On an asphalt baseball field in Brooklyn, two teams from local Yeshivah schools meet. At first, it just seems like a baseball game between two Jewish high school teams. But the game quickly turns into a holy war when the caftan and ear lock wearing Hasidic team begins to taunt and bully the less conservative “hell-bound sinners” on the other team. Hate boils as Danny Saunders, the leader of the Hasidic team, purposely hits a pitch right back at the pitcher, crushing his glasses and landing him in the hospital for a week. This is how Chaim Potok 's book The Chosen begins.…

    • 2428 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Danny frequently 'had to be in control' (p.167) in his relationships with his teachers or Tom, which made it 'easy for people to slip into thinking he wasn’t violent' (p.171). Barker shows the readers that in many of his relationships Danny 'was very, very good at getting people to step across that invisible border'(p.168), like 'lambs to the slaughter' (p.168). That makes the border between getting professionally or personally involved with Danny very blurred. Many characters in the book, such as Martha, Tom, Angus and Mrs Greene, have noticed that line being crossed accidentally. By creating Danny's image to be manipulative and psychopathic, Barker makes the readers question if Danny has always been like this, or if these are survival qualities, passed onto him by his father and the jailing system.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I am telling you to make him your friend and to let him make you his friend…” (74). Reuven not only listens to his father, but becomes best of friends with Danny Saunders. As simple as this act of obedience seems, it happens to prove yet another terrific part of Reuven Malter. Lastly, faithfulness happens to act as a crucial part of Reuven’s caring character.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout this all-encompassing novel, Joseph J. Ellis is depicting what truly happened in prominent political events rather than the common ideas. He extensively goes into great depths rather than merely scraping the surface of these phenomenal affairs. Specifically, he elaborates on events such as the Duel between Hamilton and Burr, The Compromise of 1790, the plague of slavery, George Washington 's presidency, and the rocky friendship between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. It is more than apparent that Ellis wrote this novel to provide great insight as to what really occurred on some of the most monumental days of American History. On a July morning of 1804, renowned politicians Aaron Burr and Alexander Hamilton met near the modern-day…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the writing of Tim O’Brien’s novel, The Things They Carried, he often uses the contradiction of topics or actions to emphasize their importance. He pairs ideas that are centralized around silence and speech to add value to what is said or not said and/or to emphasize the action associated with the silence or speech. O’Brien masters literary elements like mood and tense while portraying the contrast. Although this contrast is present throughout the book, it is most prominent in storylines included in “The Man I Killed”, “On the Rainy River”, and “Speaking of Courage.” The most prominent account in which O’Brien uses speech in contrast to silence to add value to the subject can be seen in the interaction between Kiowa, Tim, and the corpse…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Keith E. Stanovich, the author of “How to Think Straight About Psychology,” explains different aspects of psychology to his readers in the first chapter of his book. He starts off by stating how Sigmund Freud is a fraud when it comes to psychology. Although Freud’s work in psychology is so little, he is the reason why many people misunderstand psychology. Then the chapter begins to talk about how psychology is composed of different topics and studies, and when there are many different topics it is difficult to link all of the topics into one. When psychology is often discussed, many people do not consider it a science.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Silence is uncommon today when sharing what is on everyone’s mind is just a click away. Malala Yousafzai expresses that, “We realize the importance of our voice only when we are silenced.” Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson follows the freshman year after the rape of Melinda Sordino who struggles between keeping her mouth shut and using her voice against her attacker. The novel explores the crippling power of being voiceless to illustrate the importance of speaking up. Melinda demonstrates the difficulty of confession when no one will listen, preventing healing and justice.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Intergenerational Sounds of Silence: Denial, Dysfunction, and Healing in David Small’s Stitches and My Life David Small’s Stitches is an acclaimed graphic memoir that reflects the intergenerational effects of denial, silence, and repression in a young boy’s life. The dysfunction of my own family goes back generations, and is inextricably linked to the ways in which my parents and their parents and their parents’ parents grew up: in a world rife with unchecked anger, manipulation and denial. As time has passed, however, Small and I have both discovered that the exposure of the candid truth, the courage to embrace it, and the choice to make change sets the impetus for healing. A pervasive family culture of silence and suppression based…

    • 1699 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    On the other hand, Danny must follow the religious path against his will. He would rather dive into the study of psychology but since his birth, his life has followed a strict path; he will fulfill an arranged marriage and rise to his father’s position of tzaddik. He hopes his little brother, Levi, will step up in his place, but Levi often falls deathly ill. While Danny does love his brother, part of Danny’s sheer panic over Levi’s hospitalization is, “because without his brother, it might not be possible for [Danny] to break away from his father” (269). He respects his family legacy but does not wish to partake.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reb wanted his son to understand the meaning of pain so he shuts Danny out completely. David Malter and Reuven are constantly exchanging their views on life and have a very powerful father-son relationship based on their communication. Reuven…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction This essay will compare and contrast two theorists who were considered to be the founding fathers of their area of psychology . Sigmund Freud who was the founder of psychoanalysis and Carl Rogers who founded the humanistic approach. Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) was a physician who specialized in neurology and eventually devoted his life to the treatment of mental disorders using a procedure he developed called psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis states that all behaviour is driven from the unconscious mind and early childhood experiences, this approach brings up emotions from the hidden mind for analysis. (Carl Rogers (1902-1987) was a Humanistic psychologist.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compare and contrast Psychoanalytic Theory to that of Social Cognitive Perspective and the Humanistic Perspective. Also, tell me who are the primary psychologists who came up with each theory/perspective? Sigmund Freud was an influential psychiatrist and clinical psychologist. Freud began his work when he found that the disorders of the patients he was seeing made no neurological sense. What could be causing feelings that had no physical cause?…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Assignment 8: Skinner, Freud and Rogers To compare Skinner, Freud, and Rogers, is to compare three of the greats in the field of Psychology. Behaviorism, psychoanalysis, and humanism comprise the garden from which all other theories have grown. While vast differences have historically been observed in these three men and their theoretical perspectives; for those who choose to see, a few startling similarities may be found as well. For someone with little psychological background, who is just beginning to delve into Freud’s theories, it might seem that his beliefs about human behavior are based in cognitive process like Carl Rogers’s humanistic beliefs.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays