This is expressing our rights of being a US citizen but it does not allow us to impose our own ideals on others. Today we know that we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from both the constitution and the Bill of Rights. But during this feud there was no Bill of Rights present and because of this Ani-Federalists has lots to argue about. If you can imagine this from their point of view, imagine you didn’t know what your rights are as a person. If there were no outright definition many people probable were confuse and felt ripped off from what they deserve. Citizens did not know they had the rights to speak their mind and protect their land and what they believed in. Liberty is a main right that is important to a countless number of people however many take it for granted now. Liberty is being free within society, to not have restrictions by authority on someone’s way of life. This was crucial to discuss when setting in place the laws of the land because the Anti-federalist group believed it wasn’t present in the proposal. In the literature that is published by Cetnil we read from a man begging for the attention that the new constitution needs reconsideration and further detail to improve what this document could be to the people. He implores the group that is known as the the Free men of Pennsylvania that their liberties can and are being compromised if the document were to be instituted as law. Furthermore he conveys those who are not part of this new re-enforced government will be isolated from a type of elite aristocrats. This was a problem the Anti-Federalist did not want to be a part of because it was an obvious violation of human rights. Federalists believed that when their plan was put into action the liberties of man were obvious and fully defined. As I understand it by stating “that all men are created equal, that they are
This is expressing our rights of being a US citizen but it does not allow us to impose our own ideals on others. Today we know that we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from both the constitution and the Bill of Rights. But during this feud there was no Bill of Rights present and because of this Ani-Federalists has lots to argue about. If you can imagine this from their point of view, imagine you didn’t know what your rights are as a person. If there were no outright definition many people probable were confuse and felt ripped off from what they deserve. Citizens did not know they had the rights to speak their mind and protect their land and what they believed in. Liberty is a main right that is important to a countless number of people however many take it for granted now. Liberty is being free within society, to not have restrictions by authority on someone’s way of life. This was crucial to discuss when setting in place the laws of the land because the Anti-federalist group believed it wasn’t present in the proposal. In the literature that is published by Cetnil we read from a man begging for the attention that the new constitution needs reconsideration and further detail to improve what this document could be to the people. He implores the group that is known as the the Free men of Pennsylvania that their liberties can and are being compromised if the document were to be instituted as law. Furthermore he conveys those who are not part of this new re-enforced government will be isolated from a type of elite aristocrats. This was a problem the Anti-Federalist did not want to be a part of because it was an obvious violation of human rights. Federalists believed that when their plan was put into action the liberties of man were obvious and fully defined. As I understand it by stating “that all men are created equal, that they are