The mission and purpose of House Bill 790 is to “establish uniform guidelines and procedures for the use of solitary confinement for minor offenders” (Solitary Confinement in Prisons, 2017). House Bill 790 possess many goals. One of the goals that House Bill 790 upholds is to avoid minors enduring the harmful mental and physical effects of being in solitary confinement for an extensive time frame (Solitary Confinement in Prisons, 2017). Another goal that House Bill 790 is obtaining to accomplish is for the use of solitary confinement to not be used for the purposes of chastisement, coercion, or vengeance by staff (Solitary Confinement in Prisons, 2017). Lastly, House Bill 790 is aiming for solitary confinement to not be used before other less
…show more content…
Manifest implications are conscious and beneficial (Chambers & Bonk, 2013). The policy clearly provides a set of guidelines of how solitary confinement will be used for minors. The manifest function of House Bill 790 is to prevent long-term solitary and to avoid the unjust use of solitary for minors. The policy produces an end product of minors being released from prisons without suffering from the implications of flashbacks, depression, paranoia, and hallucinations, which are all common factors and symptoms of individuals being placed in solitary for an extended period of time (Read, 2017). The mission, goals, and objectives of the policy are clear, measurable, and able to be adjusted if needed. The policy is very precise in knowing how to operate dealing with minors in solitary, the people of contact when complications occur, and minors can access the rules that are put in place for the use of solitary confinement (Solitary Confinement in Prisons, 2017). The policy is measurable because researchers can measure the progress and the effects of the minors who have endured short-term solitary compared to those who have encountered long-term solitary. A study was conduced on exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement by Robert G. Morris. The results of the study concluded that short-term solitary did impact the prisoner and helped deter the likelihood of engaging in violence or other acts that can result in the use of solitary (Morris, 2015). Also, the policy can make room for adjustments if need be to better accommodate the safety of minors in North Carolina prisons. The first edition of the policy was previously named House Bill 842 and has been changed improved and renamed to House Bill 790 (Solitary Confinement in Prisons,
Manifest implications are conscious and beneficial (Chambers & Bonk, 2013). The policy clearly provides a set of guidelines of how solitary confinement will be used for minors. The manifest function of House Bill 790 is to prevent long-term solitary and to avoid the unjust use of solitary for minors. The policy produces an end product of minors being released from prisons without suffering from the implications of flashbacks, depression, paranoia, and hallucinations, which are all common factors and symptoms of individuals being placed in solitary for an extended period of time (Read, 2017). The mission, goals, and objectives of the policy are clear, measurable, and able to be adjusted if needed. The policy is very precise in knowing how to operate dealing with minors in solitary, the people of contact when complications occur, and minors can access the rules that are put in place for the use of solitary confinement (Solitary Confinement in Prisons, 2017). The policy is measurable because researchers can measure the progress and the effects of the minors who have endured short-term solitary compared to those who have encountered long-term solitary. A study was conduced on exploring the effect of exposure to short-term solitary confinement by Robert G. Morris. The results of the study concluded that short-term solitary did impact the prisoner and helped deter the likelihood of engaging in violence or other acts that can result in the use of solitary (Morris, 2015). Also, the policy can make room for adjustments if need be to better accommodate the safety of minors in North Carolina prisons. The first edition of the policy was previously named House Bill 842 and has been changed improved and renamed to House Bill 790 (Solitary Confinement in Prisons,