The use of the word ‘terror’ , where another nation regards actions of one nation as being hostile there is nothing that stops such a nation from viewing such an act as one of terror even if the acting country may do so acting based on their religious practices and it is a Human Right privilege to do so. Human Rights are components of Justice and Justice is what UN Security Council claims it upholds through its organ which is the International Court of Justice. This simply means that if the majority of the fifteen members of this Council votes against a country acting as such, the Council will and it is one of its purposes to violate Human Rights and commits injustice.
4. The failures the Council dealt with in executing its mandate.
Articles …show more content…
Strengths of the Security Council
Majority of key members are the so called ‘super powers’, for example. Regardless of that concept the facts about those countries is that they are economically developed with advanced militaries which with no doubt are equally threats to any country in the world. When there is an enormous within a declaration of any mission, the mandate will be enforced at 360 angle. Also, the legal status it gains from the International Law is indeed a legal status that is ear-worth to any government.
The permanent members in the council are economic power houses. The fact that they are economic powers is that they possess the power and influence to impose sanctions. This can be used as a mechanism for the determination to realize the need for world peace, hence the affected state would have to rectify its mistake before the sanctions are lifted. More so, the strong financial base of these member states makes it easier to satisfy the financial need required to maintain world peace, for instance military intervention so as to cater for food, health care and weapons. These strong financial base makes it …show more content…
Having a strong military basis makes it easier to arm forces for military intervention to maintain peace and security. The Security Council has access to vast intelligence which can be used to counter threats to peace and security. This is an invaluable asset to the Security Council because they become better equipped on how to deal with disputes thus improving effectiveness. This military position instills fear into any potential candidate that may threaten the worlds’ peace and security after weighing the pros and cons of facing such a military strong hold thus it deters the
4. The failures the Council dealt with in executing its mandate.
Articles …show more content…
Strengths of the Security Council
Majority of key members are the so called ‘super powers’, for example. Regardless of that concept the facts about those countries is that they are economically developed with advanced militaries which with no doubt are equally threats to any country in the world. When there is an enormous within a declaration of any mission, the mandate will be enforced at 360 angle. Also, the legal status it gains from the International Law is indeed a legal status that is ear-worth to any government.
The permanent members in the council are economic power houses. The fact that they are economic powers is that they possess the power and influence to impose sanctions. This can be used as a mechanism for the determination to realize the need for world peace, hence the affected state would have to rectify its mistake before the sanctions are lifted. More so, the strong financial base of these member states makes it easier to satisfy the financial need required to maintain world peace, for instance military intervention so as to cater for food, health care and weapons. These strong financial base makes it …show more content…
Having a strong military basis makes it easier to arm forces for military intervention to maintain peace and security. The Security Council has access to vast intelligence which can be used to counter threats to peace and security. This is an invaluable asset to the Security Council because they become better equipped on how to deal with disputes thus improving effectiveness. This military position instills fear into any potential candidate that may threaten the worlds’ peace and security after weighing the pros and cons of facing such a military strong hold thus it deters the