The information he acknowledges is put in a logical way, but the main topics are still the main thing being focused on. For example, in chapter three when he talked about the British exploitation of Iraq and Kuwaiti oil and the American exploitation of Saudi oil, but he still focused primarily on the expanse of Iran. Khalidi also never leaves any gaps in his information; he continuously gives out new information. He always gave new questions along with new answers. Like I said earlier, I think the book is for Americans who don't have much knowledge, or ignore, the past, meaning that the book is probably for any average reader, but for me personally I would say the book is for someone who has a very wide background with this type of subject. For example, one would have to have some form of knowledge on the Middle East and the western intervention with Middle East politics for just the first chapter. Likewise, if the book was intended for readers with a wide background knowledge on this subject, then yes the language Khalidi used was
The information he acknowledges is put in a logical way, but the main topics are still the main thing being focused on. For example, in chapter three when he talked about the British exploitation of Iraq and Kuwaiti oil and the American exploitation of Saudi oil, but he still focused primarily on the expanse of Iran. Khalidi also never leaves any gaps in his information; he continuously gives out new information. He always gave new questions along with new answers. Like I said earlier, I think the book is for Americans who don't have much knowledge, or ignore, the past, meaning that the book is probably for any average reader, but for me personally I would say the book is for someone who has a very wide background with this type of subject. For example, one would have to have some form of knowledge on the Middle East and the western intervention with Middle East politics for just the first chapter. Likewise, if the book was intended for readers with a wide background knowledge on this subject, then yes the language Khalidi used was