Johnson fits the context which it is written in because the formal tone it has makes the court seem more authorial as if their decision was the best. The formal tone makes the court sound smarter and like their decision is strong which helps because it makes their argument sound better and the better choice. The informal Tone of American Flag Stands for Tolerance is appropriate for his writing because he wrote a newspaper editorial about his opinion using things such as historical moments and colloquialism to draw readers in and he uses in depth things such as how people are treated in China if they were to do something like that in their country to support his statement that the flag stands for tolerance. That is why the tones for each story are appropriate for the context of their writings. In conclusion, the tones for Texas v. Johnson and American Flag Stands for Tolerance are appropriate for the context they’re written
Johnson fits the context which it is written in because the formal tone it has makes the court seem more authorial as if their decision was the best. The formal tone makes the court sound smarter and like their decision is strong which helps because it makes their argument sound better and the better choice. The informal Tone of American Flag Stands for Tolerance is appropriate for his writing because he wrote a newspaper editorial about his opinion using things such as historical moments and colloquialism to draw readers in and he uses in depth things such as how people are treated in China if they were to do something like that in their country to support his statement that the flag stands for tolerance. That is why the tones for each story are appropriate for the context of their writings. In conclusion, the tones for Texas v. Johnson and American Flag Stands for Tolerance are appropriate for the context they’re written