In chapter five of Gallagher’s book he explains Husserl’s view of the world and objects. He explains that intentional objects have all the same features of real objects in experience. Husserl argues that objects in your consciousness are the very same objects that are in your experience because they hold the same characteristics. My interpretation of this is that the objects that exist in your consciousness have to be there due to outside influences. If there were no objects outside of your experience then there would be no experience. The existence of these outside objects is the main reasoning for your consciousness since your experience is your data in phenomenology. So, your experience with such objects is what consciousness is. When we argue that all you experience is experience you're arguing that your experiences is derived from these
In chapter five of Gallagher’s book he explains Husserl’s view of the world and objects. He explains that intentional objects have all the same features of real objects in experience. Husserl argues that objects in your consciousness are the very same objects that are in your experience because they hold the same characteristics. My interpretation of this is that the objects that exist in your consciousness have to be there due to outside influences. If there were no objects outside of your experience then there would be no experience. The existence of these outside objects is the main reasoning for your consciousness since your experience is your data in phenomenology. So, your experience with such objects is what consciousness is. When we argue that all you experience is experience you're arguing that your experiences is derived from these