The Argument Of Buying A Car

Decent Essays
Well that arrival was incredibly biased and poorly written but the point stands I suppose. Now here's the real kicker, let's say we take away guns from all civilians and it's stopped in all non organized crime which we all know won't happen. There will still be crazy people who can kill others on a whim if they so chose. The government can't reasonably take away all weapons like knives cars materials to create bombs ect it just can't be done. The argument about licensing a car is also irrelevant, if I wanted to drive one I don't need to own it or have a license, just have the skills to get a pair of keys and a car in my possession. Instead why not try to teach common sense and try to help the sick rather than ignoring them followed by condemning

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Get a Knife,Get a dog, but Get Rid of Guns” by Molly Ivins was written in 2005. She begins her point point of view on gun control at the beginning of her first paragraph when she says “I am not anti-gun”(384), but she seems like she wants to ban all guns. The author isn’t making herself clear if she is pro-gun or anti-gun. Ivins talks about a group called the militia, who are part of the military force, and says they are the only ones who should have the right to bear arms. I do however agree with Ivins about how cars are just as dangerous as guns are, but they aren’t getting banned anytime soon.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does someone who shoplifts a candy bar get sentenced to death? Do American people get thrown in prison for practicing their religion? Is it illegal to speak your mind? The answer to these questions is obviously no. These are basic human rights given to us by the constitution and to take these away would be unconstitutional.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By limiting the rights of the legal citizens, the U.S. government does very little in preventing violent crime; perhaps only by stopping the illegal obtainment of weapons can they reduce violent crimes. Guns themselves do not kill people. It’s when weapons are placed in the hands of those who should not have them, those who will kill, that they kill someone…

    • 2061 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Why Gun ‘Control’ Is Not Enough,” McMahan argues that the United States should ban private gun ownership almost entirely. His most crucial claim is that general gun ownership does more damage to the U.S. than it prevents. Therefore, banning private gun ownership would minimize the amount of occasions where a gun could potentially be used for harm. In this paper, I will reject these claims presented by McMahan because the banning of private gun ownership would not inevitably lower crime rates.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The general argument made by author Paul Waldman in work “The Case For Banning Guns”, is that guns are pretty much the reason for all the murders, suicides, and mass shootings. And that if guns were banned our society would be better off. More specifically, Waldman argues that he believes guns should be banned. He states that he understands the many reasons gun owners have for not wanting the weapons to be banned. These reasons are valid such as uses for self defense, hunting, or the weapon is just important to the family and has been passed down through generations.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    62 Mass Shooting Essay

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The third point that I want to bring up is the 62 mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and 2012, 49 of the shooters used legally obtained guns. Collectively, 143 guns were possessed by the killers with about 75% obtained legally. The process people learn about these acts are through the media portraying it in the way which the media wants you to know. Many times the questions asked of the innocent bystanders are one sided, directed in a certain direction and it doesn’t give the American people the whole story. The gun control laws are not the issue, it is the way we teach people on the ways they are supposed to be used.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    William S. LaPierre from “Crime is the Basic Problem, Not Guns” claims that, “America has a crime problem, not a gun problem.” Anti-gun activists believe that by taking guns away the crime rate will drop. They believe it is too dangerous for the public especially for our children. If a new gun law were to be put in place, one that would state that guns are illegal, crime would most likely not change. People would be left defenseless against criminals.…

    • 1626 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control DBQ Essay

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A popular view held by gun-control advocates is that withholding guns from the public will eradicate the multitude of deaths involving people who would not be commonly called “criminals”. Instances such as when a man shot and killed a man in a theater for not turning his phone off, or when a middle school boy shot two fellow student with a shotgun stored in his instrument case (Source…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gun Violence In America

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The simple fact that criminals make a living out of breaking the law proves that they don’t have any respect for the law at all. Gun laws won’t stop them from getting their hands on firearms and using them. They will find a way to steal and lie their way into getting them. If only criminals owned guns, then law-abiding civilians wouldn’t be able to protect themselves. It would be ideal and the country would be closer to being a utopia, but the dream of no guns at all is somewhat delusional thinking.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kristof provides statistical information to confirm that thousands of people have died annually in vehicular related accidents. He proposes that instead of taking them away from people, guns should be regulated just as cars have been. He believes that if the government is logical about gun regulations, then there would be a decrease in gun incidents like there has been with vehicles. Despite Kristof’s credible argument, his ideas are inaccurate because the regulations that presently exist are sufficient and controlled, while still allowing guns to remain convenient.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Well Regulated

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Daniel Schultz article “The “Well Regulated” Militia of the Second Amendment: An Examination of the Framers’ Intentions” provides readers with information questioning the meaning of “well regulated” and “militia.” The Second Amendment of the United States Constitution gives the right for all citizens to bear arms under a well regulated militia, but the true meaning of “well regulated” and “militia” are the cause of the controversial issue among leaders of the United States. Daniel discusses multiple issues that arise from this: the constitution does not state who has the authority to regulate this militia and does not state which militia is being regulated. Throughout the United States Constitution, the term regulated is used multiple times,…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Private gun ownership creates more problems than it can handle if there isn’t a law to prevent situations in which anyone who feels the urge to murder has the same opportunity to get a gun as the person who will purchase a gun in the name of self-defense. If the benefits of banning private gun ownership are greater than its perceived wrongs and the ban will help maintain order in society, then the United States should ban gun ownership. McMahan knows that the reason why there is an authorized body of defense in the country is to defend its citizens; however, if there is a rise in private individuals who own guns, the control the police has becomes ineffective. Gun advocates, he says, are the perfect partners in crime of those willing to commit a crime. There will be no way of carrying out laws that have been established because all of the citizens have the same amount of power the police have.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay, “Just Take Away Their Guns”, James Q. Wilson a Management and Policy professor at UCLA, argues that legally owned guns are not the problem, in fact the real problem lies with society ignoring the usage of illegal guns. The purpose of this essay is to convey to society that gun crimes can be stopped before a shot is fired, that it does not entitle a huge stack of forms at the local gun store. Wilson effectively argues that legally owned guns are necessary for citizens to protect themselves, reasonable police frisks should be in place to stop illegal gun use before the crime is committed and ultimately guns agitate the situation making crimes worse. The authors credibility and logical appeal are overall effective, in spite of the lack of emotional appeal or connection to the audience. Despite the absence of Pathos, the author conveys an adequate amount of logic, which carries the paper to an effective and persuasive conclusion.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "It has become impossible to give up the enterprise of disarmament with abandoning the whole great adventure of building a connective peace system. "-Arthur Henderson. In the United States, the people have always been given the right to bear arms and the law protects that right for them. America needs to see the positive and negative effects of disarmament. Disarmament can bring more reliability on our safety such as less murders, robberies, and crimes.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent years, a lot of debate had been going on about the laws pertaining to firearms. Unfortunately, with all of the mass shootings and killings being reported by the media, guns are given a bad reputation. Sadly, many people believe that they should be illegal because they are dangerous and can kill people, but what these people don’t realize is making them illegal will do a lot more harm than good. Guns have created a balance in society and if we were to take them away it could cause a lot of chaos which would result in more crime and more casualties. People deserve the right to bear arms because with proper training one could possibly save his/her life and also protect others.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays