Huntington and supported by Fouad Ajami in his latest view. These flaws are discussed by Edward W. Said in The Clash of Ignorance. In this article, Said mentioned that the notions of “civilization identity” and “the interactions among seven or eight [sic] major civilization” that are introduced by Huntington are vague. Said also disagrees with the methodology that Huntington uses in deriving the facts as Huntington just relies on the article by the veteran Orientalist Bernard Lewis in The Root of Muslim Rage. Besides, Said believes that these two articles intensity the small spark of problem between the major entities which are Muslim and the West as if it is the most complicated issue in the modern culture. This is due to the idea what Islam is all about is in the eye of orientalist which leads towards false definition and interpretation. He also proposes that Huntington and Lewis have done not enough studies on the interaction between these entities. This eventually supported by “Who will Speak for Islam” as Islam is assumed to be this or that way based on the action of certain group of people without considering the majority and the fundamental of Islamic teaching itself (Eposito and
Huntington and supported by Fouad Ajami in his latest view. These flaws are discussed by Edward W. Said in The Clash of Ignorance. In this article, Said mentioned that the notions of “civilization identity” and “the interactions among seven or eight [sic] major civilization” that are introduced by Huntington are vague. Said also disagrees with the methodology that Huntington uses in deriving the facts as Huntington just relies on the article by the veteran Orientalist Bernard Lewis in The Root of Muslim Rage. Besides, Said believes that these two articles intensity the small spark of problem between the major entities which are Muslim and the West as if it is the most complicated issue in the modern culture. This is due to the idea what Islam is all about is in the eye of orientalist which leads towards false definition and interpretation. He also proposes that Huntington and Lewis have done not enough studies on the interaction between these entities. This eventually supported by “Who will Speak for Islam” as Islam is assumed to be this or that way based on the action of certain group of people without considering the majority and the fundamental of Islamic teaching itself (Eposito and