The Czar's Assassination Essay

Improved Essays
In the year 1917, the war torn Russian Empire was falling to pieces, which led to the people leading a revolution that ended in the assassination of a terrible tyrant in 1918. Occurring nearly one hundred years ago, the Russian Czar Nicholas II, was killed by revolutionists after being held captive with his family for four months. He was dethroned by his people for ineffective military leadership, persecution of religious and political groups, and neglect to Russia’s people. The assassination of Czar Nicholas the II of Russia was just because he was a tyrannical ruler who often chose the worse possible scenarios for both Russia and her people; however, others may say that the killing of his entire family along with him was unjust. The Czar's …show more content…
He had his Minister of the Interior, who was Vyacheslav Plehve, secretly organize the Jewish Pogroms (Russian for the Disaster/Destruction). Plehve would also carry out the Czar’s orders to get rid of liberal newspapermen and conspirators against the crown. Nicholas also created the Duma in response to Bloody Sunday, but a majority of the power still rested with him. In reaction to founding the Duma, he created his own upper state council, which would contain members nominated by him. The Czar also retained the power to declare war, to control the church, and to dissolve the Duma. Nicholas would further worsen the situation by neglecting the first session of the Duma’s requests, and he would continue to dissolve the Duma in its entirety. After a while, he would continue by electing a new head of the Duma, Peter Stolypin, who leaned strongly towards the conservative side( the crown). Stolypin would create a new court system that made it easier to convict and arrest both Jews and political adversaries of the Czar. These factors also ties into the Czar’s major flaw during his lifetime, which was his neglect towards both Russia and her

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    That is why Nicholas and his family were killed and that's why Bolsheviks overthrew him. Nicholas the second was executed on July 6, 1918 with his wife and and children. He was the last Tsar of Russia under the Romanov rule. He was known as “Bloody Nicholas” because of the way he handled Bloody Sunday. His role in World War 1 and Bloody Sunday led to his…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Miss Pinson English 4 9/19/14 Ivan the Terrible by- Zachary Chadwick Ivan the terrible was one of the most controversial rulers in Russia’s history. There is almost no writings about him that have survived over the years, therefore historians have been forced to go on rumors, diaries, etc. This biography will use this information in order to try and piece together his life from the golden age to the age of terror that he brought on in his later years. Early life-…

    • 1084 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Family Romanov Murder. Rebellion, & The Fall Of Imperial Russia Author: Candace Fleming. Publisher: Schwartz & Wade Topic: This book is about more than the last rulers of Russia, it is much more than that, a book of different views of peasants and their conflicts on their every day life.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The snow falls heavily on January 30, 1905 and the light powder begins to cover the thousands of bodies that lay strewn, lifeless in the streets. Among the figures of men and women you can see, "children's corpses lay in the snow" (The Last Tsar of Russia). Tsar Nicholas II was the last tsar of Russia. He was a family man with no desire to rule and did so poorly. He would have driven Russia into the ground had not been forced to advocate.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Assassination of the Duchess Anastasia What does it take to bring down the Tsar of Russia? Maybe killing him, or even his family. No matter how innocent his family is they have to die. Does that sound right? Is it right?…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decemberists wanted to establish a liberal government because they believed it would benefit the people. So, the uprising against Tsar Nicholas was the result of two different beliefs, liberal and conservative. The Decemberists were liberals and they wanted: constitutional government, “defend the rights of individuals, abolish serfdom, advance education and social welfare, and ensure basic civil rights, especially freedom of speech, press, religion, and assembly” (Riasanovsky 316). On the other hand, Nicholas was a conservative. He interested in military affairs, but did not taking much interest in the humanities.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To gain the respect of her people, Catherine put together a group of delegates in 1767 that would help her know the people’s wishes and would contribute in making a Russian constitution, but unfortunately this attempt was not successful as it was seen as too…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Essay

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages

    His effect on the aristocracy, as well as the overall central government, is clear- he only affected it negatively (“Prominent Russians”). Ivan's hatred for boyars caused him to disassemble the aristocracy, completely breaking down the current social system and reforming the government. Instead of the previous assembly, he favored the people who served him by giving them power and property. This move seemed unnecessary to some, however, because it just formed a new aristocracy and hereditary line of power (History.co). Ivan the Terrible's unchecked ambition led to exhaustion in many forms for Russia.…

    • 1299 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Romanov Massacre

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages

    On July 16, 1918, in Yekaterinburg, Russia, Tsar Nicholas II, his wife and his five children, along with his loyal servants, descended downstairs and gathered together for a family photo shoot. However, the family photoshoot turned out to be a deceptive trick created by a communist leader, Vladimir Lenin and the Bolshevik troops to lure the royal Russian family, the Romanovs, out of hiding and to end Russia’s monarchical rule. Once the Romanovs and their servants made themselves known “...suddenly, a dozen armed men burst into the room and gunned down the imperial family in a hail of gunfire” (“Romanov Family Executed”). Not only did they open fire on the family members but the troops also continued stabbing those who were barely remained…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The madness of the revolution started when czarist troops opened fire on peaceful workers trooping to the Winter Palace located in St. Petersburg, to petition their complaints and concerns to Czar Nicholas II. Czar Nicholas II was the very last Czar of Russia under Romanov rule. On January 22nd, also known as “Bloody Sunday”. About 500 protestors were brutally slaughtered, which set off a massive uproar throughout Russia with riots and even terrorist assassinations. In February, Czar Nicholas responded by broadcasting his intention to establish an elected assembly to guide the government.…

    • 1778 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    he term "pogrom" became commonly used in English after a large-scale wave of anti-Jewish riots swept through south-western Imperial Russia (present-day Ukraine and Poland) from 1881 to 1884 (in that period over 200 anti-Jewish events occurred in the Russian Empire, notably the Kiev, Warsaw and Odessa pogroms).[3] The trigger for these pogroms was the assassination of Tsar Alexander II, for which some blamed "the Jews".[4] The extent to which the Russian press was responsible for encouraging perceptions of the assassination as a Jewish act has been disputed.[5] Local economic conditions (such as ancestral debts owed to moneylenders) are thought to have contributed significantly to the rioting, especially with regard to the participation of…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If one were to have asked a Russian peasant what revolution means to them, they might answer samovol’shchina, or, translated “doing what you want.” In Sheila Fitzpatrick’s book The Russian Revolution she traces three broad themes through the course of the revolution that existed before 1917 and would continue until about the time of 1934. She examines the class struggle that was an important part of the revolution as well as the leadership that lead the Russian citizens through these tumuloous decades and she also examines the modernization that Russia experienced. Fitzpatrick breaks her book down in a chronological order in which she spends her introduction writing about the immediate events that happened prior to the outbreak of the revolution so that the reader, whether an undergraduate student, graduate student or just a fan of Russian history, can gain a true understanding of the air of change that was happening in…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “It’s Said that he out the eyes of the architect who built St. Basils so that a cathedral of such beauty could never be created again” (UKhistory.com). This shows the extent that he would go through just to make sure he has Russia under his control. Similarly, at the start of his reign over Russia they were a medieval state but he started the Russian Empire. “he was the hero of many disenfranchised Russians because he scaled back the power and abuse of the…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Nicholas didn’t follow through with the October Manifesto which promised to give the parliament more power, it gave the public more reason to distrust him. Nicholas belief in upholding the autocracy, can be seen as a factor which led to the downfall of the Romanov…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This eventually led to the Tsar's downfall." (As It Was Lived: 4-18) All in all, the overthrow of the monarchy was inevitable and unavoidable, the way things were going. The peasants' reaction to ‘Blood Sunday', the Tsar's inability to look beyond his own interests, and the extreme conditions of WWI fueled the need for a change. Totally frustrated, the common masses of Russia were forced into rebellion and anarchy. Absolute disregard for their situation and needs led to the collapse of a country… and allowed communism to raise its head.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays