The plot of the story differed in some spots but in most spots it was the same. One of them is when Mrs. White goes outside and Mr. White tells her to come back in was explained in both of them. Another is when she is trying to let Herbert in and the bolt falls. Those were both explained in the book and the play. There were also some differences. The book started off …show more content…
It was based off of fate. If you try to mess with fate, bad things will happen. The difference is how they were explained. The book went over the idea that fate ruled a lot more clearer. It went deeper than the play did. The play went over the idea that fate rules but not as clear as the book did. It stated stuff about fate but the book did a way better job explaining it. The book made more sense than the play did. Both had the same theme but the book was way more clear at explaining …show more content…
There was Mr. and Mrs. White, Herbert, and Major Morris. They all appear in the book and the play. The book explains Major Morris as a man, who was a former military Sergeant. The play showed Major Morris as a women. It explained that she was his wife and that he had died in the military. After reading the book and watching the play, I was kind of confused because I didn’t know if Major Morris was a man or a woman.
The Monkey’s paw was a great book and play. It explained an important life lesson that was not to mess with fate. If you do, there are going to be major consequences. The Whites thought that if they used the monkey’s paw it would change their fate. They couldn’t have been more wrong. They messed with their fate and Herbert ended up dying because of it. The Whites lost their son because they thought that if they used the monkey’s paw to get money, it would work and they could be rich. They tried to make their life better by using a wish, and they lost something very important to