The Negative Effects Of Wildlife Poaching

Improved Essays
Wildlife poaching has negative effects on local communities, wildlife population, and the ecosystem. The extinction of a species can effect a local communities tourism industry. “A community that relies on its wildlife to attract tourists is at great risk for economic hardship if the prevalence of poaching is high”(Estrada). If Poaching continues still on it can have a drastic effect on the food chain. For example, “when the North American Gray Wolf was on the brink of extinction, due to trophy hunting and poaching, the elk populations in Yellowstone National Park soared. With no natural predator, the elk nearly ate the aspen tree to extinction” (Estrada). As the population of the gray wolves is increasing now, the elk population is becoming

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Ripple, Beschta, Fortin and Robbins, in the early 1900s the gray wolf population in Yellowstone National Park was extinct and had a big impact on the ecosystem there (p. 224). The gray wolves in Yellowstone National Park, when present, feed on elk as their primary source of food (Ripple et…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, the low numbers in the grey wolf population have been closely watched and worried over. Since 1976, the grey wolf populations in Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan has significantly increased. With such a large increase, there will be many effects to the local human population in these areas everyday lives. Activities, such as hunting, camping, hiking, and raising cattle, will be greatly affected. With the increase in wolf populations, it can difficult and dangerous to participate in hunting.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gray Wolf Research Paper

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wolves, a marvelous sight to see either in the Rocky Mountains or Yellowstone National Park. However, per Source #7, the Gray wolf was included to the U.S Endangered Species List in 1973. The government worked to increase the population and succeeded. But now in two states, Idaho and Montana, the Gray wolf has been removed from the list and can be hunted legally. Nevertheless, since there are Gray wolves in the wild, there is debate, should the Gray wolf population be protected by the government?…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wolf Reintroduction Essay

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As a result of wolves predating the Elk of Yellowstone, the fauna has been under less pressure and studies have shown that there have been significantly higher levels of growth in some plant species since the reintroduction. For example, it has been shown that Aspen is being browsed significantly less and its population is higher (Ripple et al., 2001) than before the reintroduction and a negative correlation was found between amount of grazing and the height of the Aspen (Ripple & Beschta, 2012). There has also been shown to be effects on two species of Willow (Salix geyeriana and Salix boothii) where stem growth was shown to have doubled since 1996, this study by Beyer et al. (2007), also proved that this change was not due to other factors such as climate and that it was the presence of wolves that was the significant factor in the change of growth of the…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Wolves are affecting the Deer Population In The Upper Peninsula? I Believe that the deer population is being affected drastically and I think that there should be a wolf hunt to thin down the wolf population. The wolf hunt would help the deer population because there would be less wolves to eat the deer and the deer population would increase. The wolves are one of the biggest decrease in deer population because in our harsh and extremely long winters the deer cannot find as much food as they do in the summer and fall months, the wolves take advantage of the deer that are weaker and cannot find as much food by chasing them down and killing them.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people who were and are against the reintroduction of wolves use the claim that wolves are diminishing the elk population in areas like Yellowstone. This claim leaves out that fact that when the…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    National Park Environment

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages

    National Park Rangers have incredibly important jobs when it comes to the health of an environment. Park Rangers have the ability to cause considerable change to an environment in a positive or negative way. The role of the national park ranger is to “protect, conserve, and to provide for the enjoyment of our nation 's heritage” (Maciha). National Park Rangers know better than anyone that the most basic of changes can cause an environment, or more specifically an ecosystem to crumble. The most important member of an ecosystem is a keystone species because of their influence on all of the other organisms.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Of the many human actions that are endangering ancient natural habitats, like deforestation, pollution, releasing invasive species and replacing the woods to build woods of infrastructures, bear - hunting is one of the many, that falls into also one of the many parts that goes into answering the question, "What damages and ecosystem? " My point of view on the subject is that bear - hunting should be illegal in states with more than fifty to one - hundred bear attacks each year. If bear - hunting occurs more often than it should, human civilization may collapse due to the crippling economy of the depletion of necessary resources. First, the reason of why I think bear - hunting should be illegal is because bears critical part in the forestial…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Bison Extinction

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The cause of over-hunting or under-hunting an area greatly affects all the populations including humans. For example, if you don 't kill enough elk one year, the farmers of grass-like plants will lose crops to the large animals and therefore, lose money and time. Elk also damage fences and building structures during runting season. Elk are smart and will get into barns, eating hay stored for horses and cows for the winter months. They are a nuisance, but especially if there are too many in one area.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Violations Of Poaching

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Violations of hunting laws and regulations concerning wildlife management, local or international wildlife conservation schemes constitute wildlife crimes that are typically punishable. In rural areas of the United States, the key motives for poaching are poverty. Wildlife biologists and conservationists consider poaching to have a detrimental effect on biodiversity both within and outside protected areas as wildlife populations decline, species are depleted locally, and the functionality of ecosystems is disturbed. Poaching has traditionally been defined as the illegal hunting, killing, or capturing of wild animals, usually associated with land use rights. They considered poaching as one of the most serious threats to the survival of plant…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Wolves Were Never Needed

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Wolves Were Never Needed Cyson Orr Madison High School Wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park in 1995 to help regulate the deer, elk, and bison herds. Little did we know, they were going to do much more than just regulate them. The wolf population has rapidly grown and spread across the states, greatly affecting local, and afar ecosystems and the populations of our deer and elk herds. The reintroduction of this species was a big mistake, and i have numerous examples here to show you the positives, even though not many, and the negatives of having wolves, in our local economies. Why were wolves even reintroduced into Yellowstone in the first place?…

    • 2025 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Is Hunting Safe for Deer? The organization, IDA also known as In Defense of Animals, believes that hunting causes problems for the environment and for the deer that are being killed, while other people argue that hunting causes no problems for deer. IDA’s arguments suggest that hunters only kill for sport, and kill too many deer. They also suggest that deer do not have capabilities of defending themselves when a hunter has a firearm at hand.…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Are Hunting Bad

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The circle of life is what we call it even though others think it’s wrong. Sports like hunting and fishing are truly a good thing to have because without them there would be no humans on earth. Hunting has kept us alive for generations, so why stop now. If an emergency were to happen people who hunt would survive longer. People who hunt have smaller grocery bills because they don’t have to buy meat and they live longer off of the fresh meat…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hunting In Modern Culture

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Predators are commonly viewed as something we cannot hunt, an animal that should not be tamed by man. This is simply wrong. Without the regulated hunting of certain predators, humans are at risk. The population of Black Bears, for example, has grown by over 320% in the last fifty years (Von Drehle, 41), and according to wildlife biologist Maurice Hornocker, “There may be more mountain lions in the west than there were before European settlement.” In an article published by USA Today, it is cited that residents have started complaining about bears wandering into the cities in Oregon, where their hunting is restricted.…

    • 2400 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wildlife crime is a particular group of crime. It does not fit "clean" into the different traditional groups, or labeling, often used to describe crimes. groups such as those against people or property crimes. wildlife crimes are sometimes thought about/believed to be victimless because an (able to be seen or picked out) hurt party or victim, at least in the form of a human being, is not present or filing a complaint. However, it has been argued that in the case of wildlife crime, like other victimless crime, (community of people/all good people in the world) is the true victim because these criminal acts lead to harm to, if not the complete destruction of, whole species of animals and plants, by that/in that way affecting hunters, nature (people…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays