The Pros And Cons Of Red Meat

Improved Essays
Little do you know; you’re oblivious to the hidden dangers of the meat industry. Companies hide the bad side of meat. They don’t tell you every single detail, because they’d be out of business. I truly believe that everyone should be a vegetarian. People would be much healthier and we would have to worry less about our depleting natural resources.i ii iii v
Multiple tests and experiments have shown that consumption of meat could lead to many different health problems. A Harvard study has shown that daily consumption of red meat is linked to increase in death rate. Countries with lower fat/animal fat intake have lower breast cancer rates. Furthermore, daily consumption of red meat raises the risk of colon cancer by approximately three times.
…show more content…
World hunger is an issue that can be helped if people stopped eating meat. We grow fields and fields of wheat that go directly to animals’ feed boxes. It takes 13 pounds of wheat to make a single pound of meat. That is 12 pounds of wheat we could have fed to hungry people. It also wastes tons of water. Water is also a big issue as many people struggle to get it while we waste so much. Even though animals raised for meat don’t reach full maturity because of cost, producing one pound of meat, which can easily be consumed by a family, uses up an astonishing 2400 gallons of water. But, one pound of wheat …show more content…
People think that we were meant to eat meat. But animals on farms weren’t always mistreated. Nowadays, the ways humans treat farm animals are cruel and unnecessary. Usually, major farms keep their animals in puny cages, not even big enough for them to walk or turn around. Some companies put labels on their meats claiming to be “Humane” or “Organic”. How can meat be humane? They are still being slaughtered. It is not like all the animals lived happily or to their full potential. The farms still have to make money, so they cannot afford to keep animals alive for long. As for organic, the actual word does not mean that they lived better lives. They are still dunked in boiling hot water and kept in contaminated cages.vii Even though there are undercover videos of animal cruelty, why don’t we stop? It is horrible what we do to them, how is this

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    She further explains that if the rate of meat consumption continues to grow, by 2050, the global meat consumption will increase massively (Wellesley, n.p). These perspectives draw in a health concern for individuals because of the intake of red meat and processed meat. Meat significantly contributes to increasing the number of individuals suffering from chronic diseases such as cancers, heart illness, and type-2 diabetes. Also, she highlights environmental concerns such as land and water drainage. Wellesley continues to provide statistical evidence showing the importance of reducing meat consumption.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article also points out that the impact could even result in a pandemic, such as H1N1 or bird flu and that the overuse of antibiotics is altering the required treatment of these diseases in humans. The author estimates that the overuse of antibiotics, can and has been shown to lead to drug-resistant bacteria, which is estimated to have an annual cost of $30 billion to treat, each year. In addition to the fiscal costs, the author points out that annually over 5000 deaths, and 76 million cases of food-borne illnesses are reported. (There is obviously some bias, to be expected from this publication, but the facts are hard to ignore.) This source was helpful in exposing the risks that we at meat-eaters are taking when we eat meat (the risk of being exposed to antibiotics, and other drugs through the food we eat).…

    • 1339 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Organic foods are found to have better flavor than the cheap food. To purchase clean meat is a little more expensive but you are getting better quality, making the cost worth it. Private, individual farms sell their organic meat to some chain restaurants but other than the few, they mainly sell to local businesses. Eating the nourishment they produce is much more safe and healthy as opposed to factory produced foods.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hundreds of studies suggest that eating an abundance of fruits and vegetables along with less meat can reduce the risk of developing certain cancers. These objective studies, recommend a minimum of five daily servings of fruits and vegetables. A plant-based diet surpasses the minimum goal of vegetables to reduce the risk of cancer, promotes change in the environment, takes a stance on animal cruelty, and boosts your general health (“Becoming a…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Changing human diet can be a controversial topic and to change this omnivore’s mind one needs to present facts as cold as a fresh cut of meat. Marjorie Lee Garretson’s “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is an essay that tries to persuade the reader to a vegan lifestyle under the guise of vegetarianism using few cited sources and trying to make the reader feel bad about the way they currently eat. “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is a college level essay written by Marjorie Lee Garretson about the potential positives to vegetarian lifestyle. The essay first focuses on the health benefits of switching to vegetarianism which is done in three sentences claiming decreased cancer rates and longer life expectancy without any…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Changes In Factory Farming

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animals are put through physical and mental suffrage from being tightly packed in areas with no access to outdoors (Food & Water Watch). These animals do not have a choice in where they live and how they are treated but, farmers have a choice to treat them with respect in regards to making them comfortable. If the animals are not comfortable they can begin to be stressed which in return leads to a bigger problem. These stress-factors end up harming humans because when animals are stressed is has been proven that the livestock produces ill quality meat in regards to tenderness, perishability, and color (Science Nordic). Humans want to purchase the freshest looking meat so, if the meat does not look appealing and fresh then it will not be purchased.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    "A study funded by the American Farm Bureau Federation found that 95 percent of Americans believe farm animals should be well cared for" (Balk N.p.). In a society where the majority believes in the well treatment of animals, it is not surprising that most are unaware of the unethical practices in factory farms. If the population knew the circumstances placed on the animals such as chaining, crating, burning, dragging and more, all while still alive, there is no doubt that more people would protest and stop eating meat. "You 've got heat stress, rapid growth stress, ammonia stress due to poor air circulation, broken bones from rough handling," says Temple Grandin, an expert in low-stress animal handling facilities and professor of animal science at Colorado State University (Kimble-Evans N.p.). There is no ethical justification of these…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eating animals has been a regular meal for humans for many centuries, but it has also been opposed by veganists for many years. Although consuming animals has been opposed by vegan aficionados, it has also been a source of controversy because of how factory farming produces the meat we eat in our daily meals. In the book “Eating Animals” we get the sense that the author will be arguing and encouraging veganism, but instead he argues about how the meat we consume is produced. The author Jonathan Safran Foer’s main claim in the book is about boycotting animal factory farming and encouraging traditional husbandry because factory farm animals are stuffed with antibiotics, mutilated, tightly confined, and deprived of stimulation. While traditional…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The European Union is more progressive than the U.S. on regulating humane farm practices; however, many U.S. states have taken steps to discontinue some of the most egregious practices, such as gestation crates, veal crates, and battery cages (Puhler 462). While the author examines whether any farming of animals for food can be considered moral or ethical, I don't believe we will become a nation of vegetarians any time soon, so the notion of regulating "humane" treatment of farm animals seems a real possibility. Another related…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement consists of privileged ideology based off emotion and no logic. Nathanael Johnson explores these ideals in “Is there a Moral Case for Meat?” and a couple in the film “At the Fork” explores the morality of farming. While the article and film seem to take similar stances on the farming of animals, I disagree. Humans do not have a responsibility to avoid meat or mitigate the suffering of farm raised animals.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States animals that are raised for organic meat have access to fresh air, the outdoors, and water. By law they can not give the animals hormones or antibiotics and are fed organic, free of animal by products feed. According to a report from 2007 from the Range Improvement Task Force “organic meat accounted for 3% of total US meat 12 "natural and organic" beef accounted for 4% of total beef sales in the United States.” The FDA has regulations on the way animals are treated and what they are feed. Though there are regulations on the treatment of animals, the rules aren't usually followed.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meat is an important part of daily life, yet it is ruining the environment. Processing food today is becoming increasingly unsustainable, especially through the production of meat. As technology advances, easier production methods are created, and meat is cheaper. These new methods come at a cost to the environment because they are emitting more fossil fuels, creating excessive waste, and damaging land. In order to have a more sustainable society, it is essential to use sustainable production, packaging, and transportation methods, as well as eat alternatives to meat.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Meat Vs Vegetarianism

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Many times vegetarianism has thought to be more ecological choice than eating meat. This is because increasing cattle need a lot of water and corn whereby plenty of people could be nourished. It also takes much energy to keep the meat cold during the transportation and storing. Unfortunately, it is not all black and white that vegetarianism is environmentally friendly and everything else is bad.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people don’t realize what we eat has such an impact on our Earth and the people in it. Two of the issues with livestock is that it takes 2,500 gallons of water and twelve pounds of grain to produce only one pound of beef. 80-90% of US water is used for agriculture and over half of the U.S. grain is being fed to livestock instead of being used for direct human consumption, and animal agriculture is one of the leading causes of world hunger. Animal agriculture is also responsible for 91% of amazon destruction and has an extremely negative impact on climate change. The documentary Cowspiracy says “Animal Agriculture is responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays