The Singer Solution To World Poverty Summary

Decent Essays
Peter Singer a professor of bioethics called the attention of the urgent need for food and medicine in certain parts of the world in an article he wrote that appeared in the New York Times Magazine titled “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. In his article he argues that the wealthy class should donate whichever money they spend on “luxuries” to oversea organizations such as UNICEF and Oxfam America. I think that it is a simpleton idea that has no real thought behind it. Time and time again there have been people in the past that have repeated this argument over and over again. But these people who claim that this is an easy idea refuse to see it from the wealth point of view. Those people put in the extra risk and work to get the prosperous …show more content…
How easy it would be for the well accommodated to willingly give what they don’t need to charity and help solve the world’s problem. The thing is you don’t need to be “wealthy” to understand why you don’t see many of these kinds of people donating whatever they can. I work for my school in the after hours feeding the who choose to stay after school for other activities. I work 3 out if the five days for 2 hours. I feed the middle school first, wipe down the tables (after cleaning up the trash they leave behind) and repeat for the high schoolers, from 3:30 to 5:45. Is the the best job in the world obviously not but it's manageable. Now here’s the thing, when I get my paycheck I always have the option of cashing it out and donating all to charity because my parents already support my basic needs so what do I need the extra money for. It’s the sensation that you get when you get that envelope in your hands and you say to yourself that you’ve earned this and you feel so good that you decide to reward yourself not give it a way, Did those people that you’re giving the money work those hours after school giving un valuable free time, I think not so why would spend money in them when instead you would prefer to reward your hard work and buy yourself a pair of new

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He reasons that everyone on the planet does not have an equal entitlement on the resources of others, that we are bound to a greater duty to our family and circle, who have a greater right. By providing for and ensuring happiness to our immediate needs from all others that may claim to our resources, is, in fact, a more efficient means to achieve happiness. Singer counters that although pockets within these first world nations can experience poverty relative to others within their population, these developing nations face absolute poverty, where life is plagued by hardships including death, disease, squalid living conditions and overall despair. Where industrialized nations possess a prosperity and capacity to provide assistance to third world nations, Singer suggests that a donation of one-tenth of their wage would not only lessen the destitution of their fellow man but could be achieved without cost to their own particular well-being and wealth. As this act would maximize the utility or happiness for the greatest number of world citizens and therefore have an ethical obligation to do…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He may have persuaded many individuals to give a specific measure of cash to organizations for poor nations, yet his article isn't sufficiently powerful to persuade me. Everyone should be entitled to have the luxury to spend it on what their hearts desire, despite the fact that many would contend that they are doing as such to the cost of their ethical quality. Singer uses a hypothetical situation where he describes a guy named Bob and his fondness for his Bugatti. Bob invested in the car because further down the line he will be able to sell it and he will be financially stable due to it being a very valuable and classic collective. One day Bob decided to hike for a bit so he parked his car near a railroad track only to get to the top and see a train from far away speeding really fast towards a child on the track.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I take the stance to agree with Peter Singer in this case. I think that as a fairly wealthy society, we are morally ought to help and aid those in need of any fundamental resources in order to properly endure. People who make a good income should feel the need to contribute their efforts to charity. If everyone in the nation donated, the total amount would be very much sufficient to what is needed. In Singer’s essay, he mentioned that if everyone donated a certain amount, there will in fact be a sufficient amount that would absolutely be put good use .…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Why Is Peter Singer Wrong

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Australian philosopher Peter Singer, believes that when we refuse to help end world hunger, we become murders. He believes that it is are moral obligation as Americans who live comfortable lives, to help “the worlds poor” (Singer 1). It is wrong to continue to live a luxurious life, when we know that others are fighting for the mere chance to survive. In Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” he compares us Americans to two fictitious characters Dora and Bob, due to the fact that we, as Dora and Bob, chose luxuries over the chance to help people suffering from life-threatening poverty. Peter Singer compares us to a fictitious character from a Brazilian film called “Central Stations.”…

    • 1428 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aiding all those in absolute poverty could lead to massive overpopulation and the decreasing development of richer nations. An argument supporting this objection is that it is better to save some people rather than none, however some people must still be left behind. I believe that Singer does have a point about helping out the poor but he fails to establish that we absolutely have a duty to help everyone Singer’s other article, All Animals Are Equal, makes claims that we as human beings should show the same respect to the lives of non-humans so that all animals are equal.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Famine, Affluence and Morality In his article “Famine, Affluence and Morality” Peter Singer believes that people should make adjustments with their life styles and give those unnecessary spending money for the people who really needs it. According to him it is an ethical evaluation of the consequences of people’s actions. If people have all the things they need to live there is no point in buying additional things again and again just because to show the world that you are capable of buying things and you are rich. According to him it is wasting money which has no value.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many protestations to Singer’s opinion that; we have moral obligations to contribute for the prevention of poverty. Such efforts to deny our moral obligation to the world’s poor originate from various ethical positions. Two of such objections are as follows: The first objection has consequential logic, however its conclusion is different. It states that by preventing poverty now, it may lead to more suffering in the future, so we should implement a triage policy - providing help according to the urgency of need of care - in order to lessen the usage of resources which inevitably will be need in the future (Campbell et al,…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer begins his document by stating his first argument, that people in Bengal are dying from lack of food, shelter, and medical care which is not acceptable. Now, the people in Bengal are not the only people dying from these things, however at the time that Singer was writing this, Bengal was the current problem. Now-a-days, we see this problem everywhere. When I was in Belize last January there were kids walking around barefoot and extremely skinny, all we wanted to do was help them. We have the power to prevent this from happening, so why don't we?…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Often times, articles and advertisements that encourage people to donate always appear to be faulting people for have enough. Like Peter Singer stated in his article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”: “In the world as it is now, I can see no escape from the conclusion that each one of us with wealth surplus to his or her essential needs should be giving most of it to help people suffering from poverty so dire as to be life-threatening. That 's right: I 'm saying that you shouldn 't buy that new car, take that cruise, redecorate the house or get that pricey new suit. After all, a $1,000 suit could save five children 's lives” (329).…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Writing in November 1971, Peter Singer condemns developed nations for not making the necessary decisions to save East Bengalis from evitable starvation, violence, and disease. Even the most prominent aid contributors such as Britain and Australia spend much more on domestic luxury projects than on reducing fellow human suffering. Using Bengal as an example, Singer asserts that people have a moral obligation to give significant amounts of money to aid organizations. In disagreement, I will argue that we also have a right to keep our earnings because we have entitlements in terms of autonomy. While giving significant amounts of money to charity may be a morally positive act, it is not a moral obligation.…

    • 2058 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Makes the World Go Round Professor of Bioethics, Peter Singer, explains in the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” that all prosperous people should give all money that is not needed for basic necessities to places that are in need of food and medicine. As an American, I have knowledge this argument would shake up America as a whole. This could create a world of giving up the Capitalistic ways of America and the economic food chain. On the other hand, it could create a world of kindness and less violence. Can you imagine giving up your freedom to help others?…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer discusses the moral obligation of humans to prevent bad things from happening. In particular, Singer focuses on the prevention of the famine in East Bengal during November 1971 where many people were dying from poverty. Singer argues that since global poverty may be inhibited through charitable donations, then individual people ought to be morally obligated to donate what Singer defines as their surplus of money to charities that will aid impoverished nations. Singer writes his article in the format of a thought experiment, in which he presents a number of generally agreeable premises that lead up to his conclusion which is to donate as much money to charity as what Singer determines is reasonable.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is a human life worth? Some may say it is worth millions of dollars no matter what. Others might argue that a human’s worth is dependant on who they are, where they came from and what they can do. In Peter Singer’s Article “What Should a Billionaire Give?” he states that many people would be reluctant to even consider putting a fixed rate. It would be unethical to do so, however, he continues with “If we really had to, most of us would agree that the value of human life would be in the millions.”…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s materialistic world, we are told that possessions and wealth will bring us meaning when in actuality they only bring temporary satisfaction and leave us craving more. We are so caught up in satisfying our own needs and wants that we rarely take time to look around us at the needs of others. Even when we do see others suffering, many of us are too busy to help or makeup excuses as to why we can’t aid them in their time of need. We look up to celebrities like Paris Hilton and 50 Cent who lead lavish, wasteful, and selfish lifestyles and often aspire to be like them. Many of these stars give little money to charity, and if they do it’s not publicized.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays