wrong. Since everyone depends on others to follow the rules. Therefore, instead of harsh punishment is the focus of the law, with organic unify we are able to correcting and reforming people who break the goal ethics. Comparing the theories of Durkheim and Appiah, we can see how they have each tried to formulate the concepts and generalize patterns of the of today’s modern society and held a positive attitude towards organic unify. But Appiah also noticed the conflict that we are facing due to the pluralistic life, modern organic solidarity. Today, in the understanding of organic solidarity others and others’ cultures, people often try to make a judgment based on its follower’s thinking and behaviors. Ignore the question of where does
…show more content…
The discourse of knowledge matters, not only the production of knowledge. As Appiah indicates “what it’s reasonable for you to thin, faced with a particular experience, depends on what ideas you already have.”(39) This is also the case of mechanical solidarity and positivist’s POV that everyone just holds on one belief, their belief, to be universally true. Appiah refutes the idea that reality is peculiar to the science because the concept of treatment is solely created based on scientific methods which exist primarily in the Western society, so it is hard for Westerner to image anything else other than scientific methods to evaluate reality. Moreover, Appiah points out in the understanding reality; there is no fundamental difference between scientific or magical approach. He mentions due to our “attempts to understand that one reality,” (43) we fail at understanding cultural differences. Only recognizing the reality regarding its scientific feature, Westerner traps themselves into a cage that we built for ourselves, namely the creation of one
The discourse of knowledge matters, not only the production of knowledge. As Appiah indicates “what it’s reasonable for you to thin, faced with a particular experience, depends on what ideas you already have.”(39) This is also the case of mechanical solidarity and positivist’s POV that everyone just holds on one belief, their belief, to be universally true. Appiah refutes the idea that reality is peculiar to the science because the concept of treatment is solely created based on scientific methods which exist primarily in the Western society, so it is hard for Westerner to image anything else other than scientific methods to evaluate reality. Moreover, Appiah points out in the understanding reality; there is no fundamental difference between scientific or magical approach. He mentions due to our “attempts to understand that one reality,” (43) we fail at understanding cultural differences. Only recognizing the reality regarding its scientific feature, Westerner traps themselves into a cage that we built for ourselves, namely the creation of one