Thomas Malthus And Karl Marx

Improved Essays
Thomas Malthus and Karl Marx are certainly both men of substantial intellectual ability, and have demonstrated their devotedness to their ideologies through their writings. Both men were arguably among the best political and class thinkers of their time. When placed against each other, as in this debate, they stand as almost complete polar opposites of each other, with largely incompatible beliefs on the plight of the common worker. Thomas Malthus takes a classical-liberal approach to the Industrial Revolution and its attributes, arguing that misery and human nature will keep the abuses of the bourgeois in check. On the other hand, Karl Marx would take a Socialist approach, and believe Capitalism is a wretched system, which the liberal factory

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rough Draft #2 If you had the option to decide who controls society, who would you elect? Carnegie or Marx? Both of these distinguished men have different perspectives on the way right way society should function. The passage “Gospel of Wealth,” by Andrew Carnegie talks about the distribution of wealth and the responsibilities of those who have it. Carnegie makes the case that the best way of dealing with wealth inequality is for the super rich to redistribute their money in a responsible and attentive manner.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compelling Logic for Moral Degradation Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin, both of whom argue strong opposition to the continually expanding world population, present compelling logic in favor of their point using distinct styles. Malthus, in his paper, “An Essay on the Principle of Population, determines by the use of mathematical evidence that natural disasters are a positive check on human population and that an increase in human population correlates to a decrease on the moral quality of current life (556); using similar forms of logical evidence, Hardin concludes in his essay, “Lifeboat Ethics: The Case Against Helping the Poor”, that humans are innately fallible and are therefore unable to provide the resources necessary to uphold subsistence (585). Though it seems as if both Thomas Malthus and Garrett Hardin express similar assessments of, and goals for, world population, each man approaches his own solution with a unique view using various rhetorical strategies. Thomas Malthus addresses his academic audience in a logical and consequent manner; by providing multiple claims, and subsequent evidences, Malthus effectively conveys his views. Additionally, the economist provides potential scenarios and their outcomes.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carlyle Vs. Marx

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Workers in a capitalistic society are destined to ultimately be destroyed and no longer viewed as a human with equal rights under God’s law (Marx, p. 23-24, 1844). Then and now people are reduced to being seen only as a tool that goes to the repair shop (Cortes, 9 Sept., 2016). The idea that the rich owe nothing more to the poor but the agreed upon wages, no more and no less just like paying for a calculator (Carlyle, p.146-147, 1843). That even their impending death does not entitle them to some kind of help beyond a contract (Carlyle p. 150, 1843).…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism The Crucible

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Imagine living in a world where no human oppresses another. Imagine living in a world where no one is poor and no one is rich. Imagine living in a world where the social class system is non-existent. Karl Marx, a 19th century philosopher, foresaw the image of this apparent communist utopia forming in every society; he expected the maltreated working classes to fight back against those who have immense, misused power. He believed that material possessions have a powerful enough influence on our lives to be considered the sole reason of historical change.…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Beginning in the 1600s, European philosophers began thinking about how a nation should be governed. Many of these philosophers began moving towards a democracy, rather than the absolute monarchy they were under. Two of the most influential Enlightenment thinkers were John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Although John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived at different times during the Enlightenment period, Locke from 1632 to 1704 and Rousseau from 1712 to 1778, their thoughts on society and its political form are comparable. Both Locke and Rousseau believed that the people should form a government, however, their ideas of government differed.…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Industrial Revolution, occurring from 1760 to 1820, has permanently transformed the world, shifting it from manual labour into manufacturing; into a market-based economy. The Industrial Revolution birthed capitalism and its affects are still present today. A phenomenon this impactful has caught the interests of many economists, two of which being Adam Smith and Karl Marx. The two have very different opinions, with Smith arguing that the Industrial Revolution occurred because of a division of labour, every worker focussing on one specific task, and Marx arguing that machinery itself is what caused the Industrial Revolution. This essay will discuss their opposing views and compare Adam Smith’s An Inquiry Into Nature and the Causes of the Wealth of Nations – or The Wealth of Nations as it will be further referred to in this essay – with Karl Marx’s Capital.…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, it is erroneous to say that there was no "revolutionary” opposition to industrial capitalism in England, as there were many worker strikes occurring throughout the 1830s and 1840s in England. Boyer (1998) is attempting to isolate Manchester and Lancashire as unique examples of economic inequality in England, which are simply not true. Of course, Boyer (1998) utilizes the extreme form of proletariat revolution in which a communist state is realized to acknowledge the failure of Marx and Engels’ prediction for revolution, but it was also obvious that England 's parliament learned to embrace socialism as a mediating state authority between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat under the People 's Charter of 1838. I found Boyer’s (1998) not very persuasive, and he ignores labor strike movements, child labor exploitation, the exploitation of young women in textile mills, and other factors that were part of industrial policies throughout England, not simply in the extreme examples defined in Manchester and Lancashire. In some cases, it is true that Engels and Marx rely on personal experiences and political thought to argue for a communist revolution, but Boyer’s (1998) economic data is highly selective, narrow, and subjectively used to argue minutiae, instead of larger…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, Marx credits the capitalist in society, overlooking the potential of the worker, for society’s growth. “Capital is the governing power over labor, and the capitalist holds all that power” (Marx, 11). He argues that nothing can withstand the power of the capitalist, implying that the opinion and thoughts of the capitalists are the only ones that matter. Placing all control in the hands of the capitalists proves Mill’s argument- valuing the opinion of the majority, whether numerically or by economic power, is a detriment to society.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas R. Malthus was an economist who lived from 1766 to 1834. He was the first economist to suggest a systematic theory of population. Malthus was raised in the thick of the world’s Industrial Revolution which began in Britain, Malthus’s home country, within the textile industry. This was a major turning point in history manufacturing will move from skilled craftsmen creating homemade goods to machine production in factories. This increase in efficiency lead to increases in the standard of living for the population of Earth consistently for the first time ever and was the basis for creating his theory of population.…

    • 1374 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Their system of administration combined both their own as well as Roman elements. The new social order saw the dominance of the military commander, who became the monarch & a new nobility, drawn from warriors and an educated, Romanised elite. Peasants, who constituted their armies, became impoverished due to continual warfare. This led to their enserfment to feudal lords. There existed 2 kinds of groupings in feudal Europe- serfs and lords in villages and craftsmen & journeymen or apprenti who were part of the guild organization in towns.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo on the Glut in the Economy Introduction: Today, when totalitarianism is challenging democracy through potential productive power, it is ideal to re examine the differences in opinion of Thomas Malthus and David Ricardo, with respect to their debate on the possibility of economic stagnation, variously referred to as, over-production, under-consumption, or, as Malthus termed it, general glut in the economy. On Population: Adam Smith arrived at an optimistic conclusion on the outcome of a free market system while Malthus and Ricardo complying with the same natural laws of the market display fundamentally, opposing views. Smith perceived population growth as a positive social phenomenon, one essential for expanding markets, and increasing productivity , primarily for the purpose of economic growth. However, Malthus and Ricardo vocalized their rationale on the negative consequences of population growth, as the impediment of economic growth and…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays