What Is Thomson Summarize The Foetus A Future Like Ours?

Improved Essays
1. Explain Judith Jarvis Thomson's violinist example, and say what it is meant to show.

To summarize the violinist thought experiment, the subject wakes up in a hospital with his/her kidneys attached to a famous violinist who is in need of a transplant. The subject now has the choice to either disconnect him/herself effectively killing the violinist, or to stay connected to the violinist for nine months. Thomson’s violinist analogy clearly mirrors the situation of a women who is pregnant, utilizing the same nine month period. Additionally, Thomson designates the violinist as famous to reflect the preciousness of a child, who has a right to live. However, with this analogy, Thomson intends to elucidate that abortion is generally not immoral, even if the prenatal has the same basic moral status as the postnatal, because in certain situations, the mother’s right to the bodily integrity is more important that the foetus’s right to life.

2. Describe one important
…show more content…
Although abortion is not the same as a premature death, it still deprives the foetus of a future, similar to how death does. With this, Marquis attempts to sidestep a controversial premise of other arguments against abortions that suggest a foetus is a person with rights. By focusing on the future potential of the foetus. Marquis is able to sidestep a common controversial premise of other familiararguments against abortion that deal with the foetus’s status as a potential person and the rights potential people have.

4. Describe one thing that makes dying bad other than the loss of a future, and discuss whether the fact that there are other things that are bad about dying undermines the argument Marquis

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson discusses abortion in three main instances: rape, threat to mother’s life, and consensual sex. For each of these categories, she goes into detail explaining why abortion should still be permissible. Furthermore, she starts with the situation that most people would be most likely to agree with her on―that abortion should be permissible in the case of rape. She then goes on to discuss the next instance, a threat to the mother’s life, that people would be less likely to agree with her, but still more likely than the last situation with consensual sex.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson presents the anti-abortionist argument in the beginning of her paper. In order to get a better understanding of the argument I have taken the time to put it in numbered premise conclusion form: Every person has a right to life. The fetus is a person.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, him being a famous violinist he will be able to provide comfort by using his music and his talent for other people. Likewise, would be described for the mother, fetus, and abortion. If the mother lets the fetus live in her body, then she is doing it for the greater good of the fetus. If the fetus is aborted, then it is committing an act of greater good for the mother. This metaphor is an example of when abortion is permissible.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She states that the argument against abortion can be broken down into smaller arguments. The first, that every person has a right to life and that the violinist – or a foetus – is a person, thus having a right to life. As it is always wrong to kill something that has a right to life, and unpluging yourself from the violinist would be killing him, unplugging yourself is wrong. She finds that this argument is flawed, as your own right to your own body outweighs the violinists right to life. Using “The violinist” thought experiment, Thomson’s argument has succeeded in establishing that an abortion performed when the mother’s life isn’t at risk, would not be unjust.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Bailey Washington Mr. Reynolds Philosophy MWF 8:30 1 December 2016 Thomson vs. Hursthouse In this paper I will be comparing and contrasting Thomsons A Defense of Abortion and Hursthouses Virtue Theory and Abortions. Also in my paper I will be sharing my opinion on abortion and which view I agree with.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomson argues that even under the premise that the fetus is a person, the fetus’s right to life does not automatically override the mother’s right to abortion. She argues this point by presenting an analogy of an unconscious violinist whose kidney is forcibly attached to the readers’ to maintain the violinist’s life. This condition will last for nine months, she tells the readers. She seeks (to invoke/conjure) a common reaction of aversion to have the readers rethink the idea the person’s right to life is omnipotent, She the proposes another analogy inviting the readers into her line of thinking. In this scenario, the author needs Henry Fonda to touch her forehead to continue living.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomson Abortion Analysis

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Abortion in the legal sense is defined as the termination of pregnancy by various methods, including medical surgery, before the fetus is able to sustain independent life. It is also defined as the spontaneous or artificially induced expulsion of an embryo or fetus, i.e induced abortion. This is a moral issue in the sense that many ethical questions remain at hand and need to be answered by the individuals at hand. Furthermore, it is a large-scale moral issue because it not only affects people at the individual level but at a governmental and global level as well. Basing arguments off of the works of Judith Jarvis Thomson, I argue that abortion should be permitted, but with reasonable restrictions.…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This analogy is challenging the more extreme view held by those in opposition to abortion. This view finds abortion “impermissible even to save the mother’s life.” Imagine a woman has become pregnant and in the same day learns of a newly developed heart disease that will kill her if she carries her baby to term. The baby has a right to life, but so does the woman. Thomson brings up the argument most familiar.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People are known for having sympathetic feelings to a child who is visible over the unborn fetus. However, pro-life activists hold that emotions that cannot form a basis for justifying birth. With the fetus being born or not being born; the fetus does have a chance in becoming a full human being. Viability of a fetus to survive outside the womb independently is when the fetus is able to get that ‘full human being’ status. Abortion also raises ethical issues of character.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his paper ““Why Abortion is Immoral” Don Marquis explains that abortion is the moral equivalent of killing an adult human. Marquis ' argument is fairly straight-forward; abortion is seriously morally wrong because abortion involves killing. Marquis then explains that it is wrong to kill because killing robs a being of a natural property which is of great, if not the greatest, value. This he defines as the property of having a future. To be killed "deprives one of all the experiences, activities, projects, and enjoyments that would otherwise have constituted one 's future”.…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is wrong, but no one should be judged for the actions and/or decisions they make. Every human being that breathes, walks, and thinks, can decide what to do with their body. In this paper I agree with Don Marquis’s view of abortion. Abortion is wrong because it deprives the fetus from its future. In other words, abortion is wrong because killing a future child stops it from growing and making a difference to their lives.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Before Judith Jarvis Thomson, all the philosophers that have been arguing pro and against abortion have mainly been focusing on establish if the foetus is a person or not. In fact, arguments pro-abortion would argue that the foetus is only a leaiving tissue of DNA. On the other hand, arguments against it, would say that the foetus is a person since it presents human characteristics. In this regard, Thomson offers an original contribution moving one steps forward in respect to the others philosophers. In fact, once she has accepted the fact that the foetus is a person and has the right to live she addresses the question on whatever abortion is permissible or not.…

    • 1947 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This allows the readers to reflect on this question as the mother, the fetus, and the abortion process itself. In this way, readers can create their own answer instead of having the author’s opinion presented to them. However, whether or not this essay is intended to be pro-life or pro-choice, those who support abortion, will only ever be those who are…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most intricate writers on the subject of abortion all believe that whether or not abortion is morally permissible stands or falls on whether or not a fetus is the sort of being whose life it is seriously wrong to end. The purpose of this paper isn’t to address the greater ethics of abortion such as abortion before implantation or abortion when the life of a woman is threatened by a pregnancy; rather I seek to address the general argument for the claim that the overwhelming majority of deliberate abortions are seriously immoral. I which to investigate further Don Marquis claim that I something is living its wrong to kill it. If this were true people that are dying from disease would believe that they loss a future and all the experiences that they would have had. The second one is that killing alone is wrong because it automatically takes away the greatest loss, which is their life.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays