Who Is John Stuart Mill's Strict Capitalism?

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) was a British philosopher and statesman whose ideologies prompted the transition in the mid-nineteenth century from laissez-faire liberalism to a more socially conscious and democratic liberalism (Perry, 346). Consequently, Mill promoted economic democracy, a socio-economic philosophy that is defined by shifting power from corporate management to public stakeholders, however, not strict capitalism. This result came about due to Mill’s belief that capitalism allowed the government too much power, thereby leaving no room for individuals to hold a view on moral and intellectual issues. However, even though Mill feared the state as a threat to liberty, he also recognized the necessity for state intervention to promote

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill’s philosophy contained a limited government or the notion of laissez-faire (hands off)! Concluding that men should be given civil rights as long as no harm was done to anyone. John Locke claimed all mankind was equal, believing that State of Nature has natural rights to freedom, liberty and justice. Meanwhile, Hobbes posed the notion that man was inherently evil and needed a monarchical government but both were against the Divine Right and developed the ‘Social Contract’(Carol 2017).…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This analysis will critically review chapter six ‘The Heart of Liberalism’ of ‘Liberalism’ by Hobhouse (1911), in which he states his main principles and arguments on his idea of social liberalism. To him, this ideology should evolve and develop with time to fulfil the needs of society, so it can be seen as an expansion to John Stuart Mill’s view of classical liberalism (1859, pg.8). The main argument Hobhouse presents is the concept of organicism in society and its strong link with the individuals living in it, thus they are interconnected. Furthermore, the idea of equality of opportunity for people occurs through state intervention, which he argues does not mean the loss of liberty, contradicting Mill’s view of limiting state power. The arguments presented in this chapter will also be analysed with the work of Andrew Vincent to find support or criticism for it.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In John Stuart Mill’s influential book “Utilitarianism”, Mill introduces the belief that moral action is based upon the concept of utility, or how he explains it, the greatest happiness principle. It is this greatest happiness principle that defines Utilitarianism as the notion that the best moral actions are those that promote the most amount of human happiness. Actions that would be regarded as the least favorable are those that promote the opposite, unhappiness. The concept of Utilitarianism and that of Consequentialism are similar as both judge the moral value of an action dependent on its consequences, however each claim leads to different conclusions.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s On Liberty and Marx’s The Communist Manifesto are both political works about how they believe the government should be run in which they both believe that the people should not be oppressed by the government or other people. However, both differ in their opinions of what type of form a government should be; Mill believes that the government should take on the form of liberalism where it plays a limited role on society that emphasizes on individual freedom and freedom from tyranny of the majority. Marx on the other hand, believes that communism is an ideal form for a government where it will emphasize equality for the people that will eliminate exploitation among one group of people over another. While Mill believes human nature is detached…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill saw the problem with modern society as resulting from the power of both the tyranny of the majority but also the tyranny of public opinion. He believed that public opinion had grown too strong to the point where “At present individuals are lost in the crowd. In politics it is almost a triviality to say that public opinion now rules the world.” (On Liberty, chapter III). The “lost in the crowd” metaphor is a powerful one that illustrates Mill’s view.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Alexis de Tocqueville, both were advocates for individual freedom, and liberty through democracy. Mill and Tocqueville both feared tyranny, and promoted democracy so that citizens could have individual liberties, and thoughts. Mill’s ideal citizen in a democracy would be participatory, and opinionated in their beliefs. His citizen would not curtail any other citizen’s belief, no matter how far off of their beliefs it is. Tocqueville’s ideal citizen would be one who participates at a local level of politics.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A ruler or power is seen as a necessity to protect the weak from threats external and internal alike, but more often than not becomes a force against those that were meant to be protected. Still applying protection but also a sort of tyrannical pressure over the ruled. These tyrannies directly display themselves in separate yet simultaneous forms, forcing the masses at large to separate from the government and seek its own protections and/or liberties. The first tyranny discussed is that of expression, or lack thereof, in which a government silenced the expression of thoughts and opinions.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many individuals believe liberty is tied to democracy, and political choice is extremely important to Mill. Mill believes that the best form of government is Representative Government. In Representative Government, an individual has the ability to protect himself and his views. As Mill says, “Let a person have nothing to do for his country, and he will not care for it.” Meaning that if you do not let an individual have a choice, then he will have no motivation to be productive for society as a whole.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First the citizens must give themselves up to the law of the society, they must allow restrictions and limits to be placed upon them for the society to run effectively. Secondly the citizens must put themselves under the protection of the society and trust that they will be defended and taken care of. When this trust is given to the society and the government then they can effectively protect and ensure “the peace, safety, and public good of the people. This is contrary to what Mill would argue as he does not believe citizens should submit themselves to society and give away their rights. He believes that as an individual citizen you should fight for your opinion and never give into society.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Both John Stuart Mill and John Stuart Mill are credited as being the two major philosophical influences on modern-day American libertarianism. However, Locke and Marx do not speak on all of the same issues and also have different perspectives on the applications of their proposed ideology itself. In general, Mill emphasizes civil liberties but accepts government intervention for the sake of benefiting social welfare, while Locke only desires absolutely essential government involvement in all aspects of policy. Consequently, both founders would hold differing views on many different political issues in today’s society. Even though they share similar philosophical views, John Locke would oppose the individual mandate embedded within the Affordable…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s’ essay also argues that freedom of speech and diversifying opinions act as a fuel that drives social progress. Mill states, “... the only unfailing and permanent source of improvement is liberty, since by it there are as many possible independent centres of improvement as there are individuals” (Mill 65). One can gather that Mill believes that liberty is necessary for improvement and the more liberty present in individual members of society the more persons influencing change. This is an important message for our society to receive and is in accordance with our liberal democratic society. It demonstrates the importance of individuals and how their freedoms positively contribute to society because, as Mill bluntly states, without individuality…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    English philosopher, political economist, and liberal John Stuart Mill published one of his most famous works in 1859: On Liberty. Mill explores the innate and given liberties of people, analyzing what is the extent in which society or government has valid reasons to exercise power over its people. He argues that the individual should not be under the jurisdiction of society or government if their actions are not harming anyone but themselves. The only time society or government should involve themselves and exert power over citizens is if the actions of the individual are harming others within the society.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is out of the power of Mill’s ethical claim to capture whether or not the consequences of certain actions are to be acknowledged as good or bad. Solely centralizing on the power of an action’s outcomes is merely not enough to classify the act as just or unjust. Rather, by recognizing the importance of an action’s principle, or reason to determine its true moral worth; and therefore neglecting the ethics behind John Stuart Mill. Work…

    • 1398 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays