Revolutionary Tribunal

there that supported the monarchy and took action. In 1793 the Vendee region was the hub of the counterrevolution (Doc C). The people there fought against the military draft or the levee en masse (Doc C). During that time historians estimate that anywhere between 80,000 and 500,000 French people on both sides died in the Vendee region in 1973 (Doc C). In October 1793 the revolutionaries made an example of the people of Lyons. Since Lyons was a heavy counterrevolutionary’s area the revolutionaries executed 1,880 counterrevolutionaries. The revolutionaries did this to show the other counterrevolutionaries what they were going to do to defend the pro revolutionaries and the new government. That’s the reason why Maximilian Robespierre decided to start the terror so they could protect the new government. The revolutionaries simply protected themselves and the new government. The revolutionaries didn’t just kill them for fun. The only people they killed was the counterrevolutionaries. That’s why when you look at document c the revolutionaries made an example of the counterrevolutionaries in Lyons. The revolutionaries just used force as a strategic plan to handle the counterrevolutionaries inside of France and that’s why people ask why did they killed people like that so often in big cities. Based on all of the information gathered the only reason why the way the government acted upon the counterrevolutionaries was to protect themselves and to establish a new republic the ultimate…

fought back, they won major battles and were able to take over the Austrian Netherlands. In May 1794, “French victory over foreign enemies [was] nearly complete” (Doc A). Terror is justified because it was only inflicted upon traitors and enemies of France who were attempting to sabotage the spread of revolutionary ideas. At times of war, it is dangerous to trust anyone because the protection of one’s own country is the priority. In this case, the imposition of terror was required to fend off…

LEGAL ARGUMENT STANDARD OF APPELLATE REVIEW In reviewing the enforceability of a preliminary injunction an appellate court is not bound by the trial court 's findings of fact, but may weigh the evidence anew and enter its own findings of fact and conclusions of law. Kennedy v. Kennedy, 160 N.C. App. 1, 8, 584 S.E.2d 328, 332 (2003). Thus, if we must consider the facts anew, the court has to determine the enforceability of a preliminary injunction just as how the trial court determines it.…

Throughout the history, many awards have been created in order to recognize the best achievements. According to Oxford Dictionary, award is “the action of giving a payment, compensation, or prize”. Besides, prizes are awarded usually to people who accomplish to be the best in any specific category such as sports, school, artistic or even literature. In addition, within these categories, it can also find other different recognitions, since the awards tend to be dedicated to a concrete genre. For…

Verse 1: Back in 1988 All those talking politicians Words are easy, words are cheap Much cheaper than our priceless land But promises can disappear Just like writing in the sand. Verse 2: This land was never given up This land was never bought and sold The planting of the Union Jack Never changed our law at all. However, “Treaty” as James Jun Wu has suggested, did its part to mitigate the local and national tensions by offering a way of reconciliation (101). It explores the possibility of…

BUS 405 WK 9 Quiz 8 Chapter 11,12 - All Possible Questions To Purchase Click Link Below: http://strtutorials.com/BUS-405-WK-9-Quiz-8-Chapter-1112-All-Possible-Questions-BUS4058.htm BUS 405 WK 9 Quiz 8 Chapter 11,12 - All Possible Questions TRUE/FALSE 1. Currently, management might have to submit a grievance to arbitration even if the labor agreement is no longer in effect and management has decided to close its operations. 2. Arbitrators are usually more liberal than the courts in…

land. This case is significant as the Environment Court considered the cultural importance of land in making their decision. The vibe of the decision felt in line with the Treaty of Waitangi principle of ‘active protection.’ Active protection is the idea that where it is reasonable and possible, the Court has an obligation to protect Maori interests and property. While many see this case as a victory for Grace, it is unlikely that this case will have a big impact on protecting Maori land…

Merits review considers the facts and law as they are at the time of review. Another advantage of merits review is that the Court is not bound by strict rules of evidence, and proceedings are often faster, cheaper, and easier for those that self-represent. The CAA is Commonwealth legislation, so merits review is conducted at the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). Merits review allows for a decision to be determined on its merits of fact and law. Merits review can vary, affirm, or set aside a…

The Administrative Appeals Tribunal does not have to take the opinion to be correct as in regulation 2.25A, and is not bound by the opinion. Furthermore, if a decision is based upon mistaken facts it may be set aside as has been established in the case of House v R [1936] HCA 40; (1936) 55 CLR 499 (17 August 1936). Moreover the implications are that when the presiding Tribunal for merits review cases, currently the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Migration and Refugee Division), is…

regime crumbled, the revolutionary spirit of the time promised to do away with orthodoxy and create a new egalitarian society based on freedom. Ideas like these were fueled by the French philosophes, with thinkers like Voltaire referring to orthodox religion as “the mother of fanaticism and civil discord” and “the enemy of mankind” (Gliozzo, 1971, p. 274). However, later critics of the Revolution recognized that, in fact, the secular values of the Revolution had formed their own type of fanatic…